Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:43:25.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linkage politics and the persistence of national policy autonomy in emerging powers: patents, profits, and patients in the context of TRIPS compliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tricia D. Olsen  and
Aseema Sinha
Tricia D. Olsen
Affiliation:
Daniels College of Business, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80210, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Trade Related Intellectual Property Agreement (TRIPS) has had a profound effect on industrialization and innovation, as well as access to medicines in cases of public health crisis such as HIV/AIDS. However, compliance with TRIPS has varied in developing countries, despite heightened international pressure. For instance, Brazil has pursued a coherent approach to its HIV/AIDS health crisis, while India has failed to take care of its HIV patients despite late compliance with the TRIPS agreement and the presence of business firms that produce the generic medicines for HIV/AIDS. This article suggests that divergence in TRIPS compliance is the result of a linkage politics, in which global variables (global rules, global supply chains and global networks) reach into the domestic political economy to alter the interests and capabilities of domestic actors. Indian pharmaceutical firms have developed external and export interests that lower incentives for the Indian state to design a nationally relevant public health policy, while the Brazilian health movement with its societal and external linkages puts pressure on the Brazilian state to defend the interests of its HIV patients even at the cost of patents. We conclude by suggesting that linkage politics is better at helping us understand compliance with international agreements than existing explanations, with important consequences for the effectiveness of international institutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , October 2013 , pp. 323 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2013 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Eduard J. and Holland, Lynn-Marie. 2006. The HIV Pandemic: Local and Global Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berkman, Alan, Garcia, Jonathan, Muñoz-Laboy, Miguel, Paiva, Vera, and Parker, Richard. 2005. “A Critical Analysis of the Brazilian Response to HIV/AIDS: Lessons Learned for Controlling and Mitigating the Epidemic in Developing Countries.” American Journal of Public Health 95 (7): 1162–1172.Google Scholar
Beyrer, Chris, Gauri, Varun, and Vaillancourt, Denise. 2005. Evaluation of the World Bank's Assistance in Responding to teh AIDS Epidemic: Brazil Case Study. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Berman, Peter A. 1998. “Rethinking Health Care Systems: Private Health Care Provision in India.” World Development 26 (8): 1463–1479.Google Scholar
Biehl, João. 2004. “The Activist State: Global Pharmaceuticals, AIDS, and Citizenship in Brazil.” Social Text 80: 105–132.Google Scholar
Boone, Catherine and Batsell, Jake. 2001. “Politics and AIDS in Africa: Research Agendas in Political Science and International Relations.” Africa Today 48 (2): 3–33.Google Scholar
Bruce, James. 2003. “Strong medicine – Strategies.” Business Network, 23. Accessed February 19, 2008. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0OQC/is_9_2/ai_100439522.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Sudip. 2005. The WTO and India's Pharmaceuticals Industry: Patent Protection, TRIPS, and Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jillian Clare. 2000. “Public Policies in the Pharmaceutical Sector: A Case Study of Brazil.” The World Bank, LCSHD Paper Series, #21064.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jillian Clare. 2006. “Expanding Drug Access in Brazil: Lessons for Latin America and Canada.” Canadian Journal of Public Health 97 (6): I15–18.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jon. 2007. “Brazil, Thailand Override Big Pharma Patents.” Science 316 (5826): 816.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jillian Clare and Lybecker, Kristina M. 2005. “AIDS Policy and Pharmaceutical Patents: Brazil's Strategy to Safeguard Public Health.” World Economy 28 (2): 211–230.Google Scholar
Dube, Siddharth. 1992. “Façade of AIDS Prevention?” Economic and Political Weekly (April 11–18): 757.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry and Frieden, Jeffry. 1993. “The Political Economy of European Monetary Unification: An Analytical Introduction.” Economics & Politics 5 (2): 85–104.Google Scholar
Eimer, Thomas and Lütz, Susanne. 2010. “Developmental States, Civil Society, and Public Health: Patent Regulation for HIV/AIDS Pharmaceuticals in India and Brazil.” Regulation & Governance 4 (2): 135–153.Google Scholar
Elias, Paulo Eduardo M and Cohn, Amelia. 2003. “Health Reform in Brazil: Lessons to Consider.” American Journal of Public Health 93 (1): 44–48.Google Scholar
Flynn, Matthew. 2008. “Public Production of Anti-Retroviral Medicines in Brazil, 1990–2007.” Development and Change 39 (4): 513–536.Google Scholar
Flynn, Matthew. 2011. “Corporate Power and State Resistance: Brazil's Use of TRIPS Flexibilities for Its National AIDS Program.” In Intellectual Property, Pharmaceuticals and Public Health: Access to Drugs in Developing Countries, edited by Shadlen, Kenneth C., Guennif, Samira, Guzman, Alenka and Lalitha, N. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Flynn, Matthew. 2013. “Origins and Limitations of State-Based Advocacy Brazil's AIDS Treatment Program and Global Power Dynamics.” Politics & Society 41 (1): 3–28.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry and Rogowski, Ronald. 1996. “The Impact of the International Economy on National Politices: An Analytical Overview.” In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, edited by Keohane, Robert O. and Milner, Helen V. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Nathan, Wilson, David, Bunjumnong, Onanong and von Schoen Angerer, Tido. 2004. “The Role of Civil society in Protecting Public Health over Commercial Interests: Lessons From Thailand.” The Lancet 363: 1893–1895.Google Scholar
Galvão, Jane. 2000. AIDS no Brasil: a agenda de construção de uma epidemia. Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34.Google Scholar
Galvão, Jane. 2002. “Access to Antiretroviral Drugs in Brazil.” The Lancet 360: 1862–1865.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun and Lieberman, Evan S. 2006. “Boundary Institutions and HIV/AIDS Policy in Brazil and South Africa.” Studies in Comparative International Development 41 (3): 47–73.Google Scholar
Gómez, Eduardo J. 2011. “How Brazil Outpaced the United States When It Came to AIDS: The Politics of Civic Infiltration, Reputation, and Strategic Internationalization.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 36 (2): 317–352.Google Scholar
Gupta, Amit Sen. 2008. “Amendement to the Indian Patents Act” Found at: http://phm-india.org/issues/patents/. Accessed on June 14, 2008.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Milner, Helen V., eds. 1996. Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert Owen and Nye, Joseph S. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz 2008. “Law, Politics, and Access to Essential Medicines in Developing Countries,” Politics and Society 2008: 207–246.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Guido Carlos and Vitória, Marco Antonio A. 2002. “Fighting Against AIDS: The Brazilian Experience.” AIDS 16 (18): 2373–2383.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 435–452.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2009. Boundaries of Contagion: How Ethnic Politics Have Shaped Government Responses to AIDS. New Jersey, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1997. “Linkage Politics.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1): 38–67.Google Scholar
Nag, Moni. 2005. “Sex Workers in Sonagachi: Pioneers of a Revolution.” Economic and Political Weekly 40: 5151–5156.Google Scholar
Osava, Mario. 2001. “NGOs the Driving Force Behind Public Policy on AIDS.” IPS-Press Service. Accessed September 17, 2008. http://ipsnews.net/aids/page_7.shtml Google Scholar
Petchesky, Rosalind P. 2003. “HIV/AIDS and the Human Right to Health: On a Collision Course with Global Capitalism.” In Global Prescriptions: Gendering Health and Human Rights. London, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, Rimmer, Matthew and Rubenstein, Kim. 2010. “Access to Essential Medicines: Public Health and International Law.” In Incentives for Global Public Health: Patent Law and Access to Essential Medicines, edited by Pogge, Thomas, Rimmer, Matthew and Rubenstein, Kim. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.Google Scholar
Rangnekar, Dwijen. 2006. “No Pills for Poor People?: Understanding the Disembowelment of India's Patent Regime.” Economic and Political Weekly 415: 409–417.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James. 1969. Linkage Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Shadlen, Kenneth C. 2009. “The Politics of Patents and Drugs in Brazil and Mexico: The Industrial Bases of Health Policies.” Comparative Politics 42 (1): 41–58.Google Scholar
Sherrll, Kenneth, Somerville, Carolyn and Bailey, Robert. 1992. “What Political Science Is Missing by Not Studying AIDS.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 25 (4): 688–693.Google Scholar
Aseema, Sinha (Unpublished book Ms titled: When David Meets Goliath: How Global Trade and Rules are Changing India's Rise to Power).Google Scholar
Supakankunti, S., Janjaroen, W.S., Tangphao, O., Raianawijitrasin, S. 2001. “Impact of the World Trade Organization TRIPS Agreement on the Pharmaceutical Industry in Thailand.” Bulletin – World Health Organization 75 (5): 461–470.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2010. “The Strategy of Paired Comparison: Toward a Theory of Practice.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (2): 230–259.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1997. “Trading up and Governing Across: Transnational Governance and Environmental Protection.” Journal of European Public Policy 4 (4): 556–571.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 1996. “Japan, the World Bank, and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance: The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective.” New Left Review 217: 124–137.Google Scholar