Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:08:50.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Selection Bias in Business Ethics Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Harvey S. James Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Suppose we want to know whether the ethics of persons with one characteristic differ from the ethics of persons having another characteristic. Self-selection bias occurs if people have control over that characteristic. When there is self-selection bias, we cannot be sure observed differences in ethics are correlated with the characteristic or are the result of individual self-selection. Self-selection bias is germane to many important business ethics questions. In this paper I explain what self-selection bias is, how it relates to business ethics research, and how to correct for it. I also illustrate the correction process in an empirical analysis of the effect of organizational rank on worker ethics. Using data from the European Values Survey, I find that being a supervisor is positively correlated with worker ethics. However, I also find a negative self-selection effect. Workers with relatively lower ethics are selected into supervisory roles.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2006 , pp. 559 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdolmohammadi, M. J., Read, W. J., and Scarbrough, D. P.. 2003. “Does Selection-Socialization Help to Explain Accountants’ Weak Ethical Reasoning?” Journal of Business Ethics 42(1): 71–81.Google Scholar
Abdolmohammadi, M. J., and Reeves, M. F.. 2000. “Effects of Education and Intervention on Business Students’ Ethical Cognition: A Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Study.” Teaching Business Ethics 4(3): 269–84.Google Scholar
Akaah, I. P. 1996. “The Influence of Organizational Rank and Role on Marketing Professionals’ Ethical Judgments.” Journal of Business Ethics 15(6): 605–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G., Gibbs, M., and Holmstrom, B.. 1994. “The Internal Economics of the Firm: Evidence from Personnel Data.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(4): 881–919.Google Scholar
Barnow, B. S., Cain, G. G., and Goldberger, A. S.. 1980. “Issues in the Analysis of Selectivity Bias,” in Evaluation Studies Review Annual, ed. Stromsdorfer, E. W. and Farkas, G.. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 5: 43–59.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., and Moore, D. A.. 2002. “Why Good Accountants Do Bad Audits.” Harvard Business Review (November): 97–102.Google Scholar
Chen, A. Y. S., Sawyers, R. B., and Williams, P. F.. 1997. “Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making Through Corporate Culture.” Journal of Business Ethics 16(8): 855–65.Google Scholar
Christie, R., and Geis, F.. 1970. Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collins, D. 2000. “The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1,500 Articles Published in the Journal of Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 26(1): 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. D., and Regan, D. T.. 1993. “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(2): 159–71.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. D., and Regan, D. T.. 1996. “Do Economists Make Bad Citizens?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(1): 187–92.Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. 2000. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hamilton, B. H., and Nickerson, J. A.. 2003. “Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research.” Strategic Organization 1(1): 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. R. 1990. “Ethical Values of Individuals at Different Levels in the Organizational Hierarchy of a Single Firm.” Journal of Business Ethics 9(9): 741–50.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, W. H., and Sims, H. P. Jr. 1978. “Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment.” Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4): 451–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, D., Heischmidt, K., Hill, H. H., Robinson, B., and Wiles, J.. 1997. “When Philosophy and Business Professors Talk: Assessment of Ethical Reasoning in a Cross Disciplinary Business Ethics Course.” Teaching Business Ethics 1(3): 253–68.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 2005. European and World Values Surveys Integrated Data File, 1999–2002, release I, 2nd ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
James, H. S. Jr. 2000. “Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making through Organizational Structure.” Journal of Business Ethics 28(1): 43–58.Google Scholar
James, H. S. Jr. 2003. “The Effect of Trust on Public Support for Biotechnology: Evidence from the U.S. Biotechnology Study, 1997–1998.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 19(2): 155–68.Google Scholar
Jansen, E., and Von Glinow, M. A.. 1985. “Ethical Ambivalence and Organizational Reward Systems.” Academy of Management Review 10(4): 814–22.Google Scholar
Lane, M. S., and Schaupp, D.. 1989. “Ethics in Education: A Comparative Study.” Journal of Business Ethics 8(12): 943–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leming, J. 1978. “Intrapersonal Variations in Stages of Moral Reasoning among Adolescents as a Function of Situational Context.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 7(4): 405–16.Google Scholar
Liedtka, J. M. 1989. “Value Congruence: The Interplay of Individual and Organizational Value Systems.” Journal of Business Ethics 8(10): 805–15.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marwell, G., and Ames, R.. 1981. “Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else? Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods.” Journal of Public Economics 15(3): 295–310.Google Scholar
Paulson Gjerde, K. A. 2002. “The Existence of Gender-Specific Promotion Standards in the U.S.” Managerial and Decision Economics 23(8): 447–59.Google Scholar
Ponemon, L. A. 1992. “Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(3–4): 239–58.Google Scholar
Posner, B. Z., and Schmidt, W. H.. 1993. “Value Congruence and Differences between the Interplay of Personal and Organizational Value Systems.” Journal of Business Ethics 12(5): 341–47.Google Scholar
Rest, J. R. 1986. Revised Manual for the Defining Issues Test, 3rd ed. Minneapolis: Minnesota Moral Research Projects.Google Scholar
Sankaran, S., and Bui, T.. 2003. “Ethical Attitudes among Accounting Majors: An Empirical Study.” Journal of American Academy of Business 3(1/2): 71–76.Google Scholar
Smits, J. 2001. “Career Migration, Self-Selection and the Earnings of Married Men and Women in the Netherlands, 1981–93.” Urban Studies 38(3): 541–62.Google Scholar
Sparks, J. R., and Johlke, M.. 1996. “Factors Influencing Student Perceptions of Unethical Behavior by Personal Salespeople: An Experimental Investigation.” Journal of Business Ethics 15(8): 871–87.Google Scholar
Spurgin, E. W. 2004. “Looking for Answers in all the Wrong Places.” Business Ethics Quarterly 14(2): 293–313.Google Scholar
STATA. 2003. References S–Z, release 8. College Station, Tex.: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K. 1986. “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model.” Academy of Management Review 11: 601–17.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., and Nelson, K. A.. 1995. Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do it Right. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., and Youngblood, A.. 1990. “Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior.” Journal of Applied Psychology 75(4): 378–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vella, F, and Verbeek, M.. 1999. “Estimating and Interpreting Models With Endogenous Treatment Effects.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 17(4): 473–78.Google Scholar
Verbeke, W., Ouwerkerk, C., and Peelen, E.. 1996. “Exploring the Contextual and Individual Factors on Ethical Decision Making of Salespeople.” Journal of Business Ethics 15(11): 1175–87.Google Scholar
Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B.. 1997. “The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link.” Strategic Management Journal, 18(4): 303–19.Google Scholar
Winship, C., and Mare, R. D.. 1992. “Models for Sample Selection Bias.” Annual Review of Sociology 18: 327–50.Google Scholar
Yezer, A. M., Goldfarb, R. S., and Poppen, P. J.. 1996. “Does Studying Economics Discourage Cooperation? Watch What We Do, Not What We Say or How We Play.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(1): 177–86.Google Scholar