Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:40:58.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business is one thing, Ethics is Another: Revisiting Bernard Mandeville’s The Fable of the Bees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

George Bragues
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Recent corporate scandals raise an old question anew: is capitalism fundamentally infected by immorality? A now almost forgotten answer to this question was advanced at the dawn of capitalism, an answer that students of business ethics would find profit in considering. In the early eighteenth century, Bernard Mandeville authored The Fable of the Bees, which became notorious in its day for arguing that capitalism created wealth while necessarily relying on vicious impulses. The fundamental dilemma is that morality requires self-denial while capitalism runs on self-interest. As such, Mandeville claims that business and ethics are essentially separate.

While this would appear to align him with skeptics of business ethics, Mandeville does suggest a role for moral theorists in dealing with the challenges of commercial societies. The Mandevillean business ethicist proceeds by separating the public and private spheres. In the former, where government policy toward business is at issue, the Mandevillean ethicist applies a market-friendly utilitarianism. In the latter, where individual conduct is at issue, the Mandevillean gently articulates a market-critical ethic predicated on self-restraint.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 179 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batson, C. Daniel. 1991. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Batson, C. Daniel, Nadia, Ahmad, Jodi, Yin, and Bedell, Steven J.. 1999. “Two Threats to the Common Good: Self-Interested Egoism and Empathy-Induced Altruism.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (January 1999): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, George. 1993. “Alciphron, or, the Minute Philosopher.” In Focus/George Berkeley, ed. David, Berman.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bratton, William W. 2002. “Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value.” The George Washington University Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper, No. 035, (2002) Database online. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=301475.Google Scholar
Brenkert, George. 1992. “Private Corporations and Public Welfare.” Public Affairs Quarterly 6 (April): 155–68.Google Scholar
Carr, Albert Z. 1968. “Is Business Bluffing Ethical?” Harvard Business Review (January/February).Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1977. From Mandeville to Marx. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Thomas R. Jr. 1964. “Mandeville’s Moral Prose,” ELH 31: 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, William N., and Topoleski, Julie H.. 2002. “The Social and Economic Impact of Native American Casinos.” National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. W9198 (September). Database online. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=330337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H., Thomas, Gilovich, and Regan, Dennis T.. 1993. “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (Spring): 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno, and Stephan, Meier. 2001. “Political Economists are Neither Selfish nor Indoctrinated.” CESifo Working Paper No. 490, IEER Working Paper No. 69 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=259265).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.” New York Times Magazine (September 13).Google Scholar
Gide, Charles, and Charles, Rist. 1900. A History of Economic Doctrines from the Time of the Physiocrats to the Present Day, 2nd edition, trans. Richards, R.. Boston: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Gilder, George. 1981. Wealthy and Poverty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. 1985. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Grinols, Earl L., Mustard, David B., and Cynthia, Hunt Dilley. 2000. “Casinos, Crime, and Community Costs.” Working Paper (June) Online database. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=233792.Google Scholar
Harth, Philip. 1969. “The Satiric Purpose of the Fable of the Bees.” Eighteenth Century Studies, 2: 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1966. “Dr. Bernard Mandeville.” Proceedings of the British Academy 52: 125–41.Google Scholar
Heath, Eugene. 2002. Morality and the Market. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Heimann, Eduard. 1964. History of Economic Doctrines. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hind, G. 1968. “Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees as Menippean Satire.” Genre 1: 307–15.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 1750. Reflections upon Laughter: And Remarks upon the Fables of the Bees. Glasgow: R. Urie.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1960. The General Theory of Employment. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Landreth, Harry. 1975. “The Economic Thought of Bernard Mandeville.” History of Political Economy 7: 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomborg, Bjorn. 2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. 1724. A Modest Defense of Publick Stews: or an Essay upon Whoring as it is Now Practic’d in these Kingdoms, “Written by a Layman” Los Angeles: Augustan Reprint Society.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. 1732. An Enquiry Into the Origin of Honour and the Usefulness of Christianity in War (London: J. Brotherton), 3.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. 1953. A Letter to Dion Occasion’d by his Book call’d Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher. Introduction by Jacob Viner. Los Angeles: Clark Memorial Library.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. 1988. The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits. With a Commentary, Critical, Historical, and Explanatory. Edited with an Introduction by Kaye, F. B.. 2 Vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. 1999. By a Society of Ladies: Essays in the Female Tatler, ed. Goldsmith, M. M.. Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Maner, Jon. K, Luce, Carol K., Neuberg, Steven L., and Cialdini, Robert B.. 2002. “The Effects of Perspective Taking on Motivations for Helping: Still No Evidence for Altruism.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (November): 1601–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1967. Das Kapital, vol. 1, ed. Frederick, Engels.New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. C. 1951. “Ethics and Politics in Mandeville.” Philosophy 26 (1951): 242–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Charles W. A. 2000. “Introduction.” Mandeville and Augustan Ideas: New Essays, ed. Prior, Charles W. A.. Victoria: University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Rachels, James. 1993. The Elements of Moral Philosophy, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Ridley, Matt. 1996. The Origins of Virtue. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1976. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott-Taggart, M. J. 1966. “Mandeville: Cynic or Fool?” Philosophical Quarterly 16: 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seto, Theodore. 2002. “The Morality of Terrorism.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 35: 1227–63.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Yearbook. 2003. (March 5) (http://editors.sipri.se/pubs/yb02/ch06.html).Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1953. “Introduction,” in A Letter to Dion Occasion’d by his Book call’d Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher. Los Angeles: Clark Memorial Library, 1–15.Google Scholar
Waddock, Sandra. 2002. “Fluff is Not Enough—Managing Responsibility for Corporate Citizenship.” Ethical Corporate Magazine (March–April): 12–13.Google Scholar