Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Discourse Ethics and Social Accountability: The Ethics of SA 8000

Abstract
ABSTRACT:

Based on theoretical insights of discourse ethics as developed by Jürgen Habermas, we delineate a proposal to further develop the institutionalization of social accounting in multinational corporations (MNCs) by means of “Social Accountability 8000” (SA 8000). First, we discuss the cornerstones of Habermas's discourse ethics and elucidate how and why this concept can provide a theoretical justification of the moral point of view in MNCs. Second, the basic conception, main purpose, and implementation procedure of SA 8000 are presented. Third, we critically examine SA 8000 from a Habermasian perspective, and discuss advantages and drawbacks of the initiative. Fourth, to address the drawbacks, we introduce a “discourse-ethically” extended version of SA 8000. We show that this approach is theoretically well-founded and able to overcome some of the current deficits of the certification initiative. We demonstrate that the extended version of SA 8000 can be successfully applied on a cross-cultural basis, and that our findings have significant implications for other international ethics initiatives.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

E. Abrahamson 1996. Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21: 254–85.

M. Alvesson , & D. Karreman 2000. Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53: 1125–49.

M. Alvesson , & H. Willmott 2003. Introduction. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying management critically: 122. London: Sage Publications.

A. R. Belal 2002. Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: A review of UK firms' social and ethical accounting, auditing, and reporting (SEAAR) practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9: 825.

M. T. Brown 2005. Corporate integrity: Rethinking organizational ethics and leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

G. Burrell 1994. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 4: The contribution of Jürgen Habermas. Organization Studies, 15: 119.

D. Cecez-Kecmanovic , M. Janson , & A. Brown 2002. The rationality framework for a critical study of information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 17: 21527.

W. F. Chua , & P. Degeling 1993. Interrogating an accounting-based intervention on three axes: Instrumental, moral and aesthetic. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18: 291318.

A. Crane , & D. Matten 2004. Business ethics: A European perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

T. Donaldson 2003. Editor's comments: Taking ethics seriously—A mission now more possible. Academy of Management Review, 28: 363–66.

T. Donaldson , & T. W. Dunfee 1994. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19: 252–84.

S. R. S. Finke 2000. Habermas and Kant: Judgment and communicative experience. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 26(6): 2145.

J. G. Finlayson 2000. Modernity and morality in Habermas's discourse ethics. Inquiry, 43: 319–40.

J. G. Finlayson 2005. Habermas: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. M. Froomkin 2003. Habermas@discourse.net: Towards a critical theory of cyberspace, Harvard Law Review, 116: 751873.

M. Göbbels , & J. Jonker 2003. AA1000 and SA8000 compared: A systematic comparison of contemporary accountability standards. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18: 5458.

R. Gray 2001. Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: What (if anything) have we learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10: 915.

R. Gray 2002. The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27: 687708.

J. S. Harrison , & R. E. Freeman 1999. Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 479–85.

J. Hendry 1999. Universalizability and reciprocity in international business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9: 405–20.

R. Jiang , & P. Bansal 2003. Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 1047–67.

G. Kell , & D. Levin 2003. The global compact network: An historic experiment in learning and action. Business and Society Review, 108: 151–81.

R. C. Laughlin 1987. Accounting systems in organizational contexts: A case for critical theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12: 479502.

G. Lehman 1999. Disclosing new worlds: A role for social and environmental accounting and auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24: 217–41.

D. L. Levy , M. Alvesson , & H. Willmott 2003. Critical approaches to strategic management. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying management critically: 92110. London: Sage Publications.

J. F. Lozano 2001. Proposal for a model for the elaboration of ethical codes based on discourse ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10: 157–62.

I. Mamic 2005. Managing global supply chain: The sports footwear, apparel and retail sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 59: 81100.

M. R. Mathews 1997. Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10: 481531.

M. McIntosh , R. Thomas , D. Leipziger , & G. Coleman 2003. Living corporate citizenship: Strategic routes to socially responsible business. London: FT Prentice Hall.

R. K. Mitchell , B. R. Agle , & D. J. Wood 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853–86.

M. Parker 2003. Business, ethics and business ethics: Critical theory and negative dialectics. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying management critically : 197219. London: Sage Publications.

R. Phillips , E. R. Freeman , & A. C. Wicks 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13: 479502.

M. Power , & R. Laughlin 1996. Habermas, law and accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21: 44165.

A. Rasche , & D. Esser 2006. From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability: Applying Habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research. Journal of Business Ethics, 65: 251–67.

D. Reed 1999. Stakeholder management theory: A critical theory perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9: 453–83.

E. Schnebel 2000. Values in decision-making processes: Systematic structures of J. Habermas and N. Luhmann for the appreciation of responsibility in leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 27: 7989.

W. Schweiker 1993. Accounting for ourselves: Accounting practice and the discourse of ethics. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18: 231–51.

A. Sen 1993. Does business ethics make economic sense? Business Ethics Quarterly, 3: 4554.

T. Shearer 2002. Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27: 541–73.

L. K. Treviño , G. Weaver , D. G. Gibson , & B. L. Toffler 1999. Managing ethics and legal compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review, 41: 131–51.

R. v. Tulder , & A. Kolk 2001. Multinationality and corporate ethics: Codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 267–83.

J. Unerman , & M. Bennett 2004. Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate social accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29: 685708.

S. Watson , & G. Weaver 2003. How internationalization affects corporate ethics: Formal structures and informal management behavior. Journal of International Management, 9: 7593.

S. K. White 1980. Reason and authority in Habermas: A critique of critics. The American Political Science Review, 74: 1007–17.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×