Skip to main content

Participation versus Consent: Should Corporations Be Run according to Democratic Principles?1

  • Stefan Hielscher (a1), Markus Beckmann (a2) and Ingo Pies (a1)

The notion of “democracy” has become a much-debated concept in scholarship on business ethics, management, and organization studies. The strategy of this paper is to distinguish between a principle of organization that fosters participation (type I democracy) and a principle of legitimation that draws on consent (type II democracy). Based on this distinction, we highlight conceptual shortcomings of the literature on stakeholder democracy. We demonstrate that parts of the literature tend to confound ends with means. Many approaches employ type I democracy notions of participation and often take for granted that this also improves type II democratic legitimation. We hold this to be a mistake. We provide examples of the ambiguity of organizational procedures and show that under some circumstances a decrease in the degree of participation may actually increase legitimation because a governance structure that results in higher productivity can provide higher benefits for all parties involved, serve their interests and therefore meet their agreement. Less type I democracy may mean more type II democracy. We believe this to be an important insight for judging (and further improving) the legitimacy of both capitalistic firms and competitive markets.

Hide All
Alchian, A.A., and Demsetz, H.. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization,” American Economic Review 62: 777–95.
Bäckstrand, K. 2006. “Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development,” European Journal of International Relations 12(4): 467–98.
Bainbridge, R. 2008. The New Corporate Governance in Theory and Practice. Oxford York: Oxford University Press.
Barro, R.K., and Gordon, D.. 1983. “Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy,” Journal of Monetary Economics 12: 101–21.
Beckmann, M. 2010. Ordnungsverantwortung. Rational-Choice als ordonomisches Forsc-hungsprogramm. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.
Beckmann, M., Hielscher, S., and Pies, I.. 2014. “Governance Strategies for Corporate Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade-Offs into Win-Win Outcomes,” Business Strategy and the Environment 23: 1837.
Blair, M.M. 1999. “Firm-Specific Human Capital and Theories of the Firm,” in Employees and Corporate Governance, ed. Blair, M.M. and Roe, M.J., 5890. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Blair, M.M., and Stout, L.A.. 1999. “A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law,” Virginia Law Review 85: 247328.
Blanc, S., and Al-Amoudi, I.. 2013. “Corporate Institutions in a Weakened Welfare State: A Rawlsian Perspective,” Business Ethics Quarterly 23(4): 497525.
Boatright, J.R. 2004. “Employee Governance and the Ownership of the Firm,” Business Ethics Quarterly 14(1): 121.
Boatright, J.R. 2011. “The Implications of the New Governance for Corporate Governance,” in Corporate Citizenship and New Governance, ed. Pies, I. and Koslowski, P.. Dordrecht: Springer, 133146.
Boatright, J.R. 2014. Ethics in Finance. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Brenkert, G.G. 1992. “Freedom, Participation and Corporations: The Issue of Corporate (Economic) Democracy,” Business Ethics Quarterly 2: 251–69.
Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J.M. 1985. The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. London: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, J.M. 1965. “Ethical Rules, Expected Values, and Large Numbers,” Ethics 76(1): 113.
Buchanan, J.M. 1987. “Constitutional Economics,” in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, vol. 1: 585–88.
Buchanan, J.M. 1995. “Individual Rights, Emergent Social States, and Behavioral Feasibility,” Rationality and Society 7(2): 141–50.
Buchanan, J.M. 2000. The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Buchanan, J.M., and Tullock, G.. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Campbell, D.E. 2006. Incentives: Motivation and the Economics of Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Courpasson, D., and Dany, F.. 2003. “Indifference or Obedience? Business Firms as Democratic Hybrids,” Organization Studies 24(8): 1231–60.
Cukierman, A. 2010. Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and evidence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Cutler, A.C. 2001. “Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy,” Review of International Studies 27: 133–50.
Dahl, R.A. 1985. A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Driver, C., and Thompson, G.. 2002. “Corporate Governance and Democracy: The Stakeholder Debate Revisited,” Journal of Management and Governance 6: 111–30.
Dryzek, J. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fetter, F.A. 1905. The Principles of Economics: With Applications to Practical Problems. New York.
Friedman, M. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” The New York Times Magazine (13 September).
Gintis, H. 1989. “Financial Markets and the Political Structure of the Enterprise,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 11: 311–22.
Gomez, P.-Y., and Korine, H.. 2005. “Democracy and the Evolution of Corporate Governance,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 13(6): 739–51.
Gray, R.H., Dey, C., Owen, D.L., Evans, R., and Zadek, S.. 1997. “Struggling with the Praxis of Social Accounting: Stakeholders, Accountability, Audits and Procedures,” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10(3): 325–64.
Greenberg, E.S. 1986. Workplace Democracy: The Political Effects of Participation. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Habermas, J. 2001. The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hansmann, H. 2000. The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Harrison, J.S., and Freeman, R.E.. 2004. “Is Organizational Democracy worth the Effort?,” Academy of Management Executive 18(39): 4953.
Heath, J. 2011. “Business Ethics and the ‘End of History’ in Corporate Law,” Journal of Business Ethics 102, suppl. 1: 520.
Henderson, D. 2004. The Role of Business in the Modern World: Progress, Pressures and Prospects for the Market Economy. London: The Institute of Economics Affairs.
Hirschman, A.O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Homann, K. 1988. Rationalitat und Demokratie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Hsieh, N. 2008. “Workplace Democracy, Workplace Republicanism and Economic Democracy,” Revue de Philosophie Economique 9(1): 5778.
Hussain, W. 2012. “Nurturing the Sense of Justice: The Rawlsian Argument for Democratic Corporatism,” in Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls, and Beyond, , ed. O’Neill, M. and Williamson, T., 180–200. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hutt, W.H. 1940. “The Concept of Consumers’ Sovereignty,” The Economic Journal 50(197): 6677.
Jensen, M.C. 2002. “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function,” Business Ethics Quarterly 12: 235–56.
Kerr, J.L. 2004. “The Limits of Organizational Democracy,” Academy of Management Executive 18(3): 8197.
Klein, B., Crawford, R.G., and Alchian, A.A.. 1978. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process,” Journal of Law and Economics 21: 297326.
Kreps, D.M. 1990. “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory,” in Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, ed James, E. Alt and Kenneth, A. Shepsle, 90–143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kydland, F.E., and Prescott, E.C.. 1977. “Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans,” Journal of Political Economy 85: 473–91.
Leijonhufvud, A. 2007. “The Individual, the Market and the Division of Labor in Society,” Capitalism and Society 2(2), Article 3.
Matten, D., and Crane, A.. 2005a. “Corporate Citizenship: Towards an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization,” Academy of Management Review 30: 166–79.
Matten, D. 2005b: “What Is Stakeholder Democracy? Perspectives and Issues,” Business Ethics: A European Review 14(1): 613.
McCall, J.J. 2001. “Employee Voice in Corporate Governance: A Defense of Strong Participation Rights,” Business Ethics Quarterly 11: 195213.
McMahon, C. 1994. Authority and Democracy: A General Theory of Government and Management. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Mises, L.v. 1962. The Free and Prosperous Commonwealth: An Exposition of the Ideas of Classical Liberalism. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand.
Moriarty, J. 2009. “Rawls, Self-Respect, and the Opportunity for Meaningful Work,” Social Theory and Practice 35(3): 441–59.
Moriarty, J. 2012. “The Connection Between Stakeholder Theory and Stakeholder Democracy: An Excavation and Defense,” Business and Society. Published online 1 April 2012.
Müller-Jentsch, W. 2008. “Industrial Democracy: Historical Development and Current Challenge,” Management Revue 19(4): 260–73.
Murphy, K.M., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W.. 1993. “Why Is Rent-Seeking So Costly to Growth?,” The American Economic Review 83(2): 409–14.
O’Dwyer, B., 2005. “Stakeholder Democracy: Challenges and Contributions from Social Accounting,” Business Ethics: A European Review 14(1): 2841.
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Palazzo, G., and Scherer, A.G.. 2006. “Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation. A Communicative Framework,” Journal of Business Ethics 66: 7188.
Palazzo, G. 2008. “Corporate Social Responsibility, Democracy, and the Politicization of the Corporation,” Academy of Management Review 33: 77375.
Parker, C. 2002. The Open Corporation: Effective Self-Regulation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, R. 2003. Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Pies, I., Beckmann, M., and Hielscher, S.. 2010. “Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship: An Ordonomic Approach to Business Ethics in the Age of Globalization,” Journal of Business Ethics 94: 265–78.
Pies, I. 2011. “Competitive Markets, Corporate Firms, and New Governance-An Ordonomic Conceptualization,” in Corporate Citizenship and New Governance, ed. Pies, I. and Koslowski, P., 171–88. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pies, I. 2014. “The Political Role of the Business Firm: An Ordonomic Re-Conceptualization of an Aristotelian Idea,” Business & Society 53(2): 226–59.
Pies, I., Hielscher, S., and Beckmann, M.. 2009. “Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship,” Business Ethics Quarterly 19: 372401.
Popper, K.R. 1966. “The Autonomy of Sociology,” in The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 2: Hegel and Marx, 89–99. New York: Harper.
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Scharpff, F. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press.
Schelling, T.C. 1984. “Economic Reasoning and the Ethics of Politics,” in Choice and Consequence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Scherer, A.G., and Palazzo, G.. 2007. “Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective,” Academy of Management Review 32: 10961120.
Scherer, A.G. 2011. “The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and Its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy,” Journal of Management Studies 48(4): 899931.
Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G., and Baumann, D.. 2006. “Global Rules and Private Actors. Towards a New Role of the TNC in Global Governance,” Business Ethics Quarterly 16: 502–32.
Schneider, A., and Scherer, A.G.. 2010. Globalization and the Political Role of the Firm: Implications for Corporate Governance. IOU Working Paper No. 118, Zürich.
Stout, L. 2012. Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishing.
Suchman, M.C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571610.
Thompson, G.F. 2005. “Global Corporate Citizenship: What Does it Mean?,” Competition & Change 9(2): 131–52.
Thompson, G.F. 2008. “The Interrelationship between Global and Corporate Governance: Towards a Democratization of the Business Firm?,” in Handbook of Research on Corporate Citizenship, ed. Scherer, A.G. and Palazzo, G., 476–98. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Turnbull, S. 1994. “Stakeholder Democracy: Redesigning the Governance of Firms and Bureaucracies,” The Journal of Socio-Economics 23(3): 321–60.
Webb, S., and Webb, J.. 1897. Industrial Democracy. London: Longmans, Green.
Williamson, O. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Willke, H., and Willke, G.. 2008. “Corporate Moral Legitimacy and the Legitimacy Of Morals: A Critique of Palazzo/Scherer’s Communicative Framework,” Journal of Business Ethics 81: 2738.
Young, I.M. 2004. “Responsibility and Global Labor Justice,” Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 365–88.
Zingales, L. 2000. “In Search of New Foundations,” Journal of Finance 55: 1623–53.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 96 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 617 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.