Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2012
The corporate charter, so restricted in its use in England, found a constantly broadening range of applications in America from the colonial period onward. The test of importance to the general welfare, originally confined to municipal, benevolent, or at most public-utility enterprises, was being applied to manufacturing ventures by the second decade of the nineteenth century.
1 Wilson, Charles, “The Entrepreneur in the Industrial Revolution in Britain,” in Lieberman, Sima, ed., Europe and the Industrial Revolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1972), 381.Google Scholar
4 Scott, William R., The Constitution and Finance of English, Scottish, and Irish Joint-Stock Companies to 1720 (Cambridge, England, 1912), Vol. 1, 330–338, 439–450.Google ScholarDuBois, Armand B., The English Business Company After the Bubble Act, 1720-1800 (New York, 1971), 3–12, 36–38, 228–231.Google Scholar
5 Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations (1776), Book 5, Chapter 1, Part 3, Articles 1 and 2.
6 Davis, Andrew M., “Corporations in the Early Days of the Colony,” Colonial Society of Massachusetts Publications, Vol. 1 (1894), 210–214.Google ScholarChafee, Zechariah Jr, “Delaware Cases, 1792-1800,” in Flaherty, David H., ed., Essays in the History of Early American Law (Chapel Hill, 1969),Google Scholar George L. Haskins, “Reception of the Common Law in Seventeenth-Century Massachusetts,” 26, and Washburn, Wilcomb E., “Law and Authority in Colonial Virginia,” 118-119, in Billias, George A., ed., Law and Authority in Colonial America (Barre, 1965).Google Scholar
7 Dodd, Edwin M., American Business Corporations Until 1860 (Cambridge, Mass., 1954), 1.Google ScholarDavis, Joseph S., Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations (Cambridge, Mass., 1917), Vol. 2, 8.Google ScholarBaldwin, Simeon E., Modern Political Institutions (New York, 1902), 193–207.Google ScholarMorris, Richard B., Studies in the History of American Law (New York, 1930), 12–13.Google Scholar
8 Angell, Joseph K., Ames, Samuel, A Treatise on the Law of Private Corporations Aggregate (Boston, 1832), 7.Google Scholar
9 Shurtleff, Nathaniel B., ed., Records of the Governor and Company of Massachusetts Bay in New England (Boston, 1853), Vol. 1, 172,Google Scholar March 3, 1635, An Order for Towns to Dispose of their Lands, Lay Penalties, and Choose Officers. Ames, Ellis and Goodell, Abner C., eds., Acts and Resolves of the Province of Massachusetts Bay (Boston, 1869),Google Scholar Vol. 1, 64, Ch. 28, 1692, An Act for Regulating Townships, Choice of Town Officers and Setting forth their Powers; 182, Ch. 15, 1694, An Act to Enable Towns, Villages and Proprietors in Common and Undivided Lands to Sue and be Sued.
10 Davis, Joseph S., Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations, Vol. 1 (Cambridge, Mass., 1918), 28, 61–71.Google ScholarAngell, Joseph K. and Ames, Samuel, A Treatise on the Law of Private Corporations Aggregate (Boston, 1832), 16–18.Google ScholarDillon, John F., Treatise on the Laws of Municipal Corporations (Chicago, 1872), 30–42.Google Scholar
11 Akagi, Roy H., The Town Proprietors of the New England Colonies (Gloucester, Mass., 1963), 3–5, 53–63, 89–91.Google ScholarAmes, Ellis and Goodell, Abner C., eds., Acts and Resolves of the Province of Massachusetts Bay (Boston, 1899), Vol. 1, 704,Google Scholar Ch. 9, 1713, An Act Directing how Meetings of Proprietors of Lands Lying in Common may be Called.
14 Roy Akagi, The Town Proprietors of the New England Colonies, 290.
15 Acts and Resolves of the Province of Massachusetts Bay (Boston, 1874), Vol. 2, 758;Google Scholar Ch. 5, 1735, An Act Directing how Meetings of Proprietors in Wharves or other Real Estate besides Lands may be Called: Vol. 3, 778; Ch. 12, 1755, An Act for the Better Securing and Rendering More Effectual Grants and Donations to Pious and Charitable Uses. McLoughlin, William G., New England Dissent (Cambridge, Mass., 1971), Vol. 1, 644–645.Google Scholar
16 Brown, Richard D., “The Emergence of Urban Society in Rural Massachusetts, 1760-1820,” Journal of American History, Vol. 61 (1974), 38–41, 47–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For an excellent ac-count of how public service enterprises became commercialized in New England towns, see Grant, Charles S., Democracy in the Connecticut Frontier Town of Kent (New York, 1972), 19–44.Google Scholar
17 Ellis, David M., Landlords and Farmers in the Hudson-Mohawk Region (New York, 1967), 20–22.Google Scholar
19 Dodd, Edwin M., American Business Corporations until 1860 (Cambridge, Mass., 1954), 3–4.Google Scholar
21 Pratt, John W., Religion, Politics and Diversity (Ithaca, N.Y., 1967), 162–164.Google ScholarSmith, Timothy L., “Protestant Schooling and American Nationality,” Journal of American History, Vol. 53 (1967), 687.Google Scholar Benjamin Rush, “Plan for the Establishment of Public Schools” (1786), 3-8; Benjamin Rush, “Thoughts Upon the Mode of Education Proper in a Republic” (1786), 13-20; and Noah Webster, “On the Education of Youth in America” (1790), 47-55, 66-69, in Rudolph, Frederick, ed., Essays on Education in the Early Republic (Cambridge, Mass., 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Lincoln, Charles Z., The Constitutional History of New York (Rochester, N.Y., 1906), Vol. 1, 541–546.Google ScholarPratt, John W., Religion, Politics and Diversity: The Church-State Theme in New York (Ithaca, N.Y., 1967), 90–101.Google ScholarMcLoughlin, William G., “The Role of Religion in the Revolution,” in Kurtz, Stephen G. and Hutson, James H., eds., Essays on the American Revolution (New York, 1973), 232–245, 253.Google Scholar
23 The same pattern was repeated in the 1840s and 1850s when many state constitutions required business corporations to be chartered by general incorporation status because most people thought that profit making opportunities should be a matter of individual energy and skill, free from state imposed restraints or state bestowed privileges.
24 The triennial reports proved completely inapplicable to rural congregations that had no endowments, and in 1798 those congregations that had failed to file reports and were legally dissolved were authorized to re-incorporate without penalty if they filed reports within three years. Soon afterwards the law became a dead letter and not until 1850 were the arrears of reports forgiven, and further reports required only from congregations with annual investment incomes in excess of $6,000. Laws of N.Y. 1798, Ch. 87; 1850, Ch. 122.
25 Philadelphia Baptist Association v. Hart's Executors (U.S.), 1819, 4 Wheaton 499. Wyllie, Irvin G., “The Search for an American Law of Charity, 1776-1844,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review, Vol. 46 (1959), 206–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarKent, James, Commentaries on American Laws (N.Y. 1827), Vol. 2, 227–232.Google ScholarZollman, Carl F., American Law of Charities (Milwaukee 1924), 17–19.Google Scholar
26 Laws of N.Y. 1788, Ch. 62 (overseers of the poor); Ch. 63 (counties); Ch. 64 (townships). New York townships were land survey units that were entitled to organize local governments when enough people settled there. They were equivalents of the speculative towns of New England. Massachusetts passed a similar statute for towns in 1786 (Ch. 34), which specifically recognized all existing towns as corporations.
27 Jackson v. Corey (N.Y.) 1811, 8 Johns 385-387 and Jackson v. Hartwell (N.Y.) 1811, 8 Johns 422-425. Finally, in Denton v. Jackson (N.Y.) 1817, 2 Johns Chancery 325-327, the Court recognized that townships and counties were corporations for limited purposes. When the conveyance of real property to township overseers of the poor was litigated because of a deficient title, the Court, in Overseers of the Poor of Pittstown v. Overseers of the Poor of Pittsburgh (N.Y.), 1820,Google Scholar 18 Johns 418, defined overseers of the poor as corporations to the extent of performing their public trust. Not until the adoption of the revised statutes in 1828 were these units of government given a statute definition as corporations known by the names they possessed.
29 Lincoln, Charles Z., ed., Messages from the Governors (Albany, N.Y., 1909), Vol. 2, 200Google Scholar (George Clinton, January 21, 1784).
30 The sale of one section of land per township to aid public education (in the 1786 New York statute) was the model for a similar provision of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. Massachusetts set up a common school system in 1789 and Connecticut established a School Fund in 1795 with the capital coming from the sale of western lands.
31 Miller, George F., The Academy System of the State of New York (New York 1969), 22–28, 65–71.Google ScholarMiddlekauff, Robert, Ancients and Axioms: Secondary Education in Eighteenth-Century New England (New Haven, 1963), 138–147.Google ScholarAbbott, Frank C., Government Policy and Higher Education: A Study of the Regents of the University of the State of New York (Ithaca, N.Y., 1958), 12–16, 24–25.Google ScholarGabel, Richard J., Public Funds for Church and Private Schools (Toledo, Ohio, 1937), 203–215.Google ScholarHobson, Elsie G., Education Legislation and Administration in the State of New York (Chicago, 1918), 18–35.Google Scholar
33 Shera, Jesse H., Foundations of the Public Library (Chicago, 1949), 59–70.Google ScholarDavis, Joseph S., Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations (Cambridge, Mass., 1917), Vol. 1, 100–101Google Scholar; Vol. 2, 17. Laws of N.Y. 1796 Ch. 43 (Libraries); 1811, Ch. 190 (Albany Bible Society); 1817, Ch. 113 (Auxiliary New York Bible Society).
34 Chroust, Anton-Hermann, The Rise of the Legal Profession in America (Norman, 1965), Vol. 2, 36–37, 250–252.Google Scholar The services that these agencies regulated were vital to public welfare, yet they were not public bodies, as were the courts; therefore, the legislature enacted reserve clauses to protect the public interest. A reserve clause allowed the legislature to amend or repeal any charter of incorporation at any time, for any reason. It was not until the adoption of the Revised Statutes in 1828 that this restraint was applied to all corporations.
35 A charter was denied the Connecticut Medical Society in 1787 because it would be a dangerous monopoly. Davis, Joseph S., Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations (Cambridge, Mass., 1917), Vol. 2, 304.Google Scholar County societies created by a general incorporation procedure overcame this objection.
36 Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of New York, 1807-1831, 27.
37 Laws of N.Y. 1784, Ch. 52; 1797, Ch. 43.
38 Durrenburger, Joseph A., Turnpikes: A Study of the Toll Road Movement in the Middle Atlantic States and Maryland (Valadosta, 1931), 103–104.Google Scholar For statistics on the large number of corporations that were chartered to improve overland transportation before 1800 see Joseph S. Davis, Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations, Vol. 2, 22-23 and after 1800 see Evans, George H., Business Incorporations in the United States, 1800-1943 (New York, 1948), 17, 20–21.Google Scholar
38 Lincoln, Charles Z., ed. Messages from the Governors (Albany, N.Y., 1909), Vol. 2, 450Google Scholar (John Jay, January 28, 1800). Governor Jay may have had the recent example of the Manhattan Company in mind when he said this, but it could as well have applied to turnpikes. Messages, Vol. 2, 511 (George Clinton, January 26, 1802); Vol. 2, 574 (Morgan Lewis, January 28, 1806). Laws of N.Y. 1807, Ch. 38. Massachusetts passed a similar statute on March 16, 1805.
40 Joseph A. Durrenburger, Turnpikes: A Study of the Toll Road Movement in the Middle Atlantic States and Maryland, 82.
41 Joseph S. Davis, Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations, Vol. 1, 81-84, 101; Vol. 2, 234-242. Baldwin, Simeon E., “American Corporations Before 1786,” American Historical Review, Vol. 8 (1908), 457–462.Google ScholarLaws of N.Y. 1798, Ch. 40 (firemen); Ch. 41 (stock fire); Ch. 46 (mutual fire); Ch. 49 (charitable); Ch. 71 (stock fire).
42 Laws of N.Y. 1785, Ch. 39. Laws of Mass. 1784, Ch. 39 (p. 138). On occasion, the New York legislature did erect the heirs of commonly held land into a corporation to facilitate dividing it: Laws of N.Y. 1808, Ch. 202.
43 Livingston, William and Smith, William Jr, eds., Laws of N.Y. 1671-1751 (New York, 1752)Google Scholar: 1737, Ch. 666, sec. 11. This statute was extended in 1743, Ch. 745; 1744, Ch. 768; 1750, Ch. 897.
44 Hammond, Bray, Banks and Politics in America (Princeton, 1967), 95–99.Google ScholarMcDonald, Forest, We the People (Chicago, 1965), 293–296.Google ScholarThayer, Theodore “The Land Bank System in the American Colonies,” Journal of Economic History, Vol. 13 (1953), 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Joseph S. Davis, Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations, Vol. 1, 73; Vol. 2, 42-43. In 1785 the Pennsylvania legislature incorporated the trustees of the state loan office, but this action merely duplicated the incorporation of the loan office of 1773. New Jersey also incorporated county loan commissioners in 1773, Ch. 111, and 1774, Ch. 591, sec. 22.
45 The first bank chartered by the New York legislature was the Bank of, North America, June 1782, a reincorporation of a bank chartered by the United States Congress to facilitate the war. It never operated in New York. The Massachusetts Bank, chartered in 1784 (Ch. 2), was also conceived as a public service institution. Oscar Handlin and Handlin, Mary F., Commonwealth (Cambridge, Mass., 1969), 99–101.Google Scholar
46 Hammond, Bray, Banks and Politics in America (Princeton, 1967), 51, 65–74, 192.Google Scholar Joseph S. Davis, Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations, Vol. 2, 44-46, 96-99. Dodd, Edwin M., American Business Corporations until 1860 (Cambridge, Mass., 1954), 201–207.Google ScholarCadman, John W., The Corporation in New Jersey (Cambridge, Mass., 1949), 61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Blandi, Joseph G., Maryland Business Corporations (Baltimore, 1934), 18.Google Scholar
48 Laws of N.Y. 1814, 286. N.Y. Assembly Journal 1814, 412. Hammond, Jabez D., Political Parties in New York (Albany, 1842), Vol. 1, 371–372.Google Scholar
50 Attorney General v. Utica Insurance Company (N.Y.), 1817, 2 Johns Chancery 390-391.
55 Messages from the Governors of New York (Albany, 1909), Vol. 2, 916–917Google Scholar (DeWitt Clinton, January 27, 1818).
56 N.Y. Senate Journal 1818, 163, 166.
57 Bray Hammond, Banks and Politics in America, 178-183.
58 Bray Hammond, Banks and Politics in America, 578-579.
60 Laws of N.Y. 1814, Ch. 12 (second session).
62 Aaron Clark, ed., “A List of all Incorporations in New York," Assembly Journal of N.Y. 1819, Appendix. Gillet, T. S., ed., General Index of the Laws of the State of New York (Albany, 1859).Google Scholar
63 Ronald E. Seavoy, “Laws to Encourage Manufacturing: New York Policy and the 1811 General Incorporation Statute,” 92-95. Pursell, Carroll W. Jr, Early Stationary Steam Engines in America (Washington, 1969), 61–68.Google Scholar Business incorporation policy was fully democratized in Connecticut by a statute passed in 1837 (Ch. 63), which allowed three or more persons to form corporations for any land of manufacturing, mechanical, mining, quarrying, or other lawful business.
64 Aubrey, Henry G., “Investment Decisions in Underdeveloped Countries,” in Novack, David E. and Lekachman, Robert, eds., Development and Society (New York, 1968), 98–100Google Scholar. Evans, George H., “A Theory of Entrepreneurship,” Journal of Economic History, Vol. 2 (1942 supplement), 142–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar