Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:32:48.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

J. & P. Coats in Tsarist Russia, 1889–1917

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2011

Dong-Woon Kim
Dong-Woon Kim
Affiliation:
Dr. Dong-Woon Kim studied at Korea, Glasgow and Nottingham Universities, and is now a research lecturer at Kyung-sung University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the activities in Russia, between 1889 and the Revolution of 1917, of J. & P. Coats, the British multinational firm that manufactured cotton thread. The main motive for Coats's local manufacturing in Russia was to avoid import duties. Manufacturing facilities were secured by means of a joint venture and acquisitions in St. Petersburg, Riga and Lodz. The Russian business was under the full control of the headquarters in Paisley, U.K., and this policy contrasts with the more decentralized management style preferred by many other British multinationals of the day. Despite the unstable political situation in Russia, Coats's mills performed better than their competitors, and accounted for some 90 percent of the national demand by the time they were confiscated in 1917.

Type
Articles
Information
Business History Review , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , Winter 1995 , pp. 465 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, McKay, J. P., Pioneers for Profit; Foreign Entrepreneurship and Russian Industrialization, 1885–1913 (Chicago, 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McKay, J. P., “John Cockerill in Southern Russia, 1885–1895: A Study of Aggressive Foreign Entrepreneurship,” Business History Review 41 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Crisp, O., Studies in the Russian Economy Before 1914 (London, 1978), 159–215Google Scholar; Thompstone, S., “British Merchant Houses in Russia before 1914,” in Edmondson, L. and Waldron, P., eds., Economy and Society in Russia and the Soviet Union, 1860–1930: Essays for Olga Crisp (London, 1992)Google Scholar; Jones, G. and Trebilcock, C., “Russian Industry and British Business 1910–1930: Oil and Armanents,” Journal of European Economic History 11 (1982).Google Scholar

2 Wilkins, M., The History of Foreign Investment in the United States to 1914 (Cambridge, Mass., 1989), 141–5Google Scholar; McKay, J. P., “Foreign Enterprise in Russian and Soviet Industry: A Long Term Perspective,” Business History Review 48 (1974): 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also McKay, Pioneers for Profit, 24–39; Lewery, L. J., Foreign Capital Investments in Russian Industries and Commerce (Washington, D.C., 1923)Google Scholar; Falkus, M., “Aspects of Foreign Investment in Tsarist Russia”, Journal of European Economic History 8 (1979): 5–36Google Scholar; Olson, , “Gold, Foreign Capital and the Industrialization of Russia,” Journal of European Economic History 14 (1985): 143–54Google Scholar; Lyashchenko, P. I., History of the National Economy of Russia to the 1917 Revolution (New York, 1949), 534–8Google Scholar; Gatrell, P., The Tsarist Economy, 1850–1917 (London, 1986), 222–8Google Scholar; Falkus, M. E., The Industrialization of Russia 1700–1914 (London, 1972), 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Dunning, J. H., Explaining International Production (London, 1988), 72–6Google Scholar; Stopford, J. M., “The Origins of British Based Multinational Manufacturing Enterprises,” Business History Review 43 (1974): 307–9Google Scholar; Nicholas, S., “Locational Choice, Performance and the Growth of British Multinational Firms,” Business History 31 (1989): 125–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, G., “Origins, Management and Performance,” in Jones, G., ed., British Multinationals: Origins, Management and Performance (Aldershot, 1986), 16–8.Google Scholar

4 McKay, Pioneers for Profit, 32, 34. For the U.S. capital in tsarist Russia, see, for instance, F. V. Carstensen, American Enterprise in Foreign Markets (1984), which deals with Singer and International Harvester.

5 Tugan-Baranovsky, M. I., The Russian Factory in the 19th Century (Homewood, Ill., 1970), 273Google Scholar; Falkus, The Industrialization, 33, 65. The best description of the growth of the Russian cotton industry is Gately, M. O., “The Development of the Russian Cotton Textile Industry in the Pre-Revolutionary Years, 1861–1913” (Ph.D. thesis, University of Kansas, 1969).Google Scholar See also, Thompstone, S., “Ludwig Knoop, The Arkwright of Russia,” Textile History 15 (1984): 45–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tugan-Baranovsky, The Russian Factory, 48–54, 273; Lyashchenko, History, 333–6; Tegoborski, M. L. De, Commentaries on the Productive Forces of Russia, Vol. II (London, 1856), 50–82Google Scholar; Portal, R., “Moscovite Industrialists; the Cotton Sector (1861–1914),” in Blackwell, W. L., ed., Russian Economic Development From Peter the Great to Stalin (New York, 1974).Google Scholar

6 1) Raw cotton consumption: Mitchell, B. R., European Historical Statistics, 1750–1970, abridged ed. (London, 1978), 252–7Google Scholar; Mitchell, B. R., International Statistics. The Americans and Australia (London, 1983), 472Google Scholar (Cf. Tugan-Baranovsky, The Russian Factory, 49, 254; Gately, The Development, 32, 45, 55–6, 120–1, 170, 177, 211, 220). 2) Spindled: Mitchell, European Historical Statistics, 258–9; Mitchell, International Statistics, 475 (Cf. Gately, The Development, 34, 52, 134, 190–1; Thompstone, “Ludwig Knoop,” 47). 3) Looms: Gately, The Development, 34, 52, 134, 190–1; Thompstone, “Ludwig Knoop,” 47.

7 Gately, The Development, 39, 135, 192; Portal, “Moscovite Industrialists,” 164.

8 Gately, The Development, 154–7; Thompstone, “Ludwig Knoop,” 50, 70–3.

9 Nicholas, S., “Agency Contracts, Institutional Modes, and the Transition to Foreign Direct Investment by British Manufacturing Multinationals before 1939,” Journal of Economic History 43 (1983): 677CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Board Meetings, J. & P. Coats (hereafter Meeting(s)), 27 Oct. 1885, 21 Dec. 1885, 1 & 15 June 1886, Minute Book, J. & P. Coats, 1884–1890, Glasgow University Archives, UGD 199/1/1/1 (hereafter Book 1).

10 Jones, “Origins,” 13–6.

11 Hannah, L., The Rise of the Corporate Economy (2nd ed, London, 1983), 185–92.Google Scholar

12 Meeting, 9 March 1887, Book 1.

13 Meetings, 6 & 18 March 1885, 25 Aug. 1885, Book 1.

14 Gately, The Development, 142–3; Thompstone, “Ludwig Knoop,” 59; Falkus, The Industrialization, 56–8.

15 Meetings, 5 & 13 April 1886, 24 Aug. 1886, 22 April 1887, Book 1.

16 The Nevsky Mill owned the largest number of spindles (160,764) and the second largest amount of capital (7,362,160 rubles), following the Narra Mill (8,780,000 rubles), in the Moscow-St. Petersburg region in 1863 (Thompstone, “Ludwig Knoop,” 70–3).

17 Meetings, 9 March 1887, 28 May 1889, 22 Oct. 1889, 2 Dec. 1889, Book 1; Meeting, 1 Oct. 1890, Minute Book, 1890–1903, UGD 199/1/1/2 (hereafter Book 2).

18 Meetings, 1 Oct. 1890, 21 Nov. 1890, 10 Dec. 1890, Book 2.

19 Gately, The Development, 143–6; Falkus, The Industrialization, 57.

20 Jones, “Origins,” 15.

21 Meeting, 27 Nov. 1891, Book 2. In 1863, the Zhukov Mill had 18,000 spindles with capital of 882,000 rubles (Thompstone, “Ludwig Knoop,” 73).

22 Zaionchkovskii, P. S., Pravitel'stvennyi Apparat Samoderzhavnoi Rossii v XIXv (Moscow, 1978), 10–1.Google Scholar

23 Meetings, 23 April 1894, 23 July 1894, 22 April 1895, 27 April 1896, 13 Oct. 1896, Book 2; Investments, J. & P. Coats, UGD 199/1/20/4–5.

24 Meetings, 22 Dec. 1896, 28 Jan. 1897, 5 Aug. 1897, Book 2; Meeting, 22 Oct. 1903, Minute Book, J. & P. Coats, 1903–1918, UGD 199/1/1/3 (hereafter Book 3).

25 Meetings, 4 May 1899, 13 Feb. 1902, Book 2.

26 Meetings, 29 March 1900, 25 Oct. 1900, 18 Sept. 1902, Book 2; Meeting, 28 May 1903, Book 3.

27 Meeting, 24 Jan. 1907, Book 3.

28 Meetings, 24 Jan. 1907, 29 Oct. 1908, 18 Feb. 1909, 27 July 1911, 20 Feb. 1913, Book 3; letters, 25 Oct. 1907, 21 Dec. 1908, Nevsky Letter Book No. 7, UGD 199/1/2/16 (hereafter Letter 7); The Russian Year Book (London, 1913), 598–9.Google Scholar

29 Meetings, 6 March 1918, 6 Nov. 1919, Minute Book, J. & P. Coats, 1918–28, UGD 199/1/1/4 (hereafter Book 4); Chairman's speech, annual general meeting (hereafter Speech), Dec. 1914, Book 3; Harris, E., “J. & P. Coats in Poland,” in Teichova, A. et al. , eds., Historical Studies in International Corporate Business (Cambridge, 1989), 135; Gately, The Development, 199; Hannah, The Rise, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Meetings, 1 Sept. 1891, 10 Dec. 1891, 12 May 1892, Book 2.

31 Meetings, 27 Sept. 1900, 25 April 1901, Book 2; letter, 30 Oct. 1900, Nevsky Letter Book No. 2, UGD 199/1/2/11 (hereafter Letter 2). It should be remembered that the dividend of multinationals' subsidiaries does not necessarily indicate either relative or absolute profitability.

32 Meeting, 18 Sept. 1902, Book 1; letter, 15 Oct. 1900, Letter 2.

33 Meetings, 11 Nov. 1903, 24 March 1904, Book 3.

34 Meetings, 28 April 1904, 2 June 1904, 14 July 1904, 26 Jan. 1905, 2 March 1905, 15 July 1905, Book 3; Speeches, Dec. 1904, Dec. 1905, Book 3.

35 Letter, 5 April 1905, Nevsky Letter Book No. 4, UGD 199/1/2/13 (hereafter Letter 4); Meeting, 6 April 1905, Book 3.

36 Meeting, 24 Aug. 1905, Book 3.

37 Meeting, 22 Feb. 1906, Book 3.

38 Meeting, 14 June 1906, Book 3.

39 Meeting, 18 Sept. 1902, Book 2; Meeting, 27 Sept. 1906, Book 3; Speech, Dec. 1906, Book 3.

40 Meetings, 28 April 1910, 2 June 1910, 18 July 1912, 22 Aug. 1912, 12 Dec. 1912, 20 Feb. 1913, 11 Dec. 1913, Book 3.

41 Meeting, 12 Dec. 1917, Book 3.

42 Thompstone, “Ludwig Knoop,” 64. Dividends of nine public French and Belgian textile companies in 1909–11 ranged from 3 percent to 18 percent with the median of 6.25 percent (The Russian Year Book, 599).

43 Jones, “Origins,” 13–5.

44 Meetings, 1 Oct. 1890, 21 Nov. 1890, 19 Dec. 1890, 1 Sept. 1891, Book 2.

45 Meetings, 1 May 1893, 18 Nov. 1895, 28 Jan. 1897, Book 2.

46 Letter, 8 Oct. 1898, Nevsky Letter Book No. 1, UGD 199/1/2/10 (hereafter Letter 1); meeting, 23 July 1894, Book 2.

47 Meetings, 27 April 1896, 25 May 1896, 25 Oct. 1900, Book 2.

48 Meetings, 25 Oct. 1900, 30 May 1901, Book 2.

49 Meetings, 28 Jan. 1897, 25 Feb. 1897, Book 2; letter, 2 Oct. 1905, Letter 4.

50 Meetings, 3 May 1900, 9 Jan. 1902, Book 2; Meeting, 26 Jan. 1905, Book 3.

51 Letter, 6 March 1906, Letter 4.

52 Meetings, 22 Feb. 1912, 12 Dec. 1912, Book 3.

53 Thompstone, “Ludwig Knoop,” 65–6. See also “The Problem of Labor,” McKay, Pioneers, 242–67.

54 Meeting, 18 Nov. 1895, Book 2; letters 18 Sept. 1907, Nevsky Letter Book No. 5, UGD 199/1/2/14 (hereafter Letter 5); letters, 14 & 21 May 1909, Letter 7; letter, 8 Dec. 1910, Nevsky Letter Book No. 8, UGD 199/1/2/17 (hereafter Letter 8); letter, 17 March 1911, Nevsky Letter Book No. 9, UGD 199/1/2/18 (hereafter Letter 9).

55 Meetings, 15 June 1905, Book 3; letter, 26 April 1906, Letter 4.

56 Thompstone, “Ludwig Knoop,” 65. See also “Belations with State and Society,” McKay, Pioneers, 268–94.

57 Letter, 21 March 1899, Letter 2; letter, 24 June 1903, Nevsky Letter Book No. 3, UGD 199/1/2/12 (hereafter, Letter 3); letter, 11 Nov. 1909, Letter 7; letter, 15 Oct. 1910, Letter 8.

58 Letter, 21 Sept. 1909, Letter 7.

59 Letter, 24 Sept. 1909, Letter 7; letters, 20 Oct. 1910, 16 Nov, 1910, Letter 8.

60 Letters, 14 Oct. 1910, 10, 14, 15 & 21 Nov. 1910, Letter 8.

61 Letter, 8 Sept. 1898, Letter 1; letter, 8 July 1901, Letter 3; letter, 15 Nov. 1906, Letter 4.

62 Speech, Dec. 1914, Book 3.

63 Speeches, Dec. 1915, Dec. 1916, Book 3; Meetings, 11 Nov. 1915, 3 Feb. 1916, 13 April 1916, Book 3.

64 Meetings, 18 May 1916, 27 June 1916, 30 Aug. 1916, 4 Oct. 1916, 8 Nov. 1916, Book 3; Speech, Dec. 1916, Book 3.

65 Meetings, 24 Jan. 1917, 7 March 1917, 11 April 1917, 16 May 1917, Book 3.

66 Speeches, Dec. 1917, Dec. 1918, Book 3; Meetings, 15 May 1918, 24 June 1918, Book 4.

67 Husband, W. B., “The Nationalization of the Textile Industry of Soviet Russia, 1917–1920: Industrial Administration and the Workers During the Russian Civil War” (Ph.D. diss., Princeton University, 1984), 251.Google Scholar For the process of nationalization in general, see, for example, Carr, E. H., The Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923 (London, 1952), Chap. 15, 16, 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Malle, S., The Economic Organization of War Communism, 1918–1921 (Cambridge, 1985), Chap. 2, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, S. A., Red Petrograd: Revolution in the Factories 1917–1918 (Cambridge, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68 Meetings, 9 April 1919, 24 June 1919, Book 4; Harris, “J. & P. Coats in Poland.”

69 Keir, D., The Coats Story, Vol. III, typescript (1964), 101.Google Scholar

70 McKay, “Foreign Enterprise,” 350–4. See also Sutton, A. C., Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917 to 1930 (Stanford, Calif., 1968)Google Scholar; Sutton, A. C., Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1930–1945 (Stanford, Calif., 1971).Google Scholar