Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T05:23:04.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Origins of the Corporate Executive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

Cyril O'Donnell
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles

Extract

One of the recurring problems in the study of management theory concerns the authority relationships between stockholders, officers, and directors of corporations. The power centers in the corporate form of enterprise are quite different from those that obtain in an individual proprietorship and in a partnership. In addition, many differences between these types of legal organizations may be noted as one considers them from the point of view of the source of executive authority or from the viewpoint of statute law and its interpretations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On this point see Radin, Max, Legislation of the Greeks and Romans on Corportions (New York, 1909), p. 97.Google Scholar

2 Lappenberg, J. M., A History of England under the Anglo-Saxon Kings, trans. Thorpe, Benjamin (London, 1845), vol. i, p. 36.Google Scholar

3 Cooke, C. A., Corporation Trust and Company (Manchester, 1950), p. 19.Google Scholar

4 Davies, R. T., A Sketch of the History of Civilisation in Medieval England, 1066–1500 (London, 1924), p. 336.Google Scholar

5 Cf. Besant, Walter, Survey of London (London, 1908), vol. i, pp. 206207.Google Scholar

6 Cf. Lambert, J. Malet, Two Thousand Years of Gild Life (Hull, 1891), especially chap. vi.Google Scholar

7 The stages by which a true corporation emerges have been well stated by Max Radin, op. cit., p. x, as follows: “We have first the individual persons, then a loose association of several of them to accomplish a temporary and definite end. As the end grows in importance and permanence the association becomes more fixed in its forms. Ultimately the end transcends the lives of the individual persons, becomes more important than the latter, and where these facts are recognized by the law, is invested with a distinct and new personality. Then and not till then, the true corporation arises.”

8 See Unwin, George, The Gilds and Companies of London (London, 1908).Google Scholar

9 Davis, Joseph S., Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations (Cambridge, 1917), pp. 112113Google Scholar.

10 Quoted by Cheyney, Edward P., An Introduction to the Industrial and Social History of England (New York, 1919), p. 150.Google Scholar

11 5 and 6 William and Mary, c. 20.

12 Hakluyt, Richard, The Principal Navigations, Voyages, Traffiques, and Discoveries of the English Nation (Glasgow, 1903), vol. ii, p. 240.Google Scholar

13 Cf. Kaye, John W., The Administration of the East India Company (London, 1853), p. 123.Google Scholar

14 Clark, M. St. Clair and Hall, D. A. (ed.s), Legislative and Documentary History of the Bank of the United States (Washington, 1832), p. 12.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., p. 32. (Italics in quotation are mine.)

16 Quoted by J. M. Lambert, op. cit., p. 105.

17 Gerson, A. J., Vaughn, E. V., and Deardorff, N. R., Studies in the History of English Commerce in the Tudor Period (New York, 1912), pp. 25 ff.Google Scholar

18 Reid, C. L., Commerce and Conquest, the Story of the Honourable East India Company (London, 1947), p. 50n.Google Scholar

19 Gerson et al., op. cit., p. 29.