No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Some Are More Equal Than Others: Intrasettlement Social Organization in Spišský Štvrtok (EBA/MBA, Slovakia)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 November 2020
Abstract
Heterarchical or hierarchical? Egalitarian or unequal? Segmented or complex? Tribe, chiefdom, middle range? All these questions have been vividly discussed in an effort to reconstruct Bronze Age society within a wider area of central Europe. The extensive spectrum of published literature offers varied and often contradictory theoretical models, but we still know very little about the organization of particular social units, especially in the context of settlements. The morphological, technological and spatial analysis of movable and immovable sources from the fortified settlement in Spišský Štvrtok contributes in many respects to solution of the discussed problem in the northeastern Carpathian region. In the case of the Spišský Štvrtok locality, we can interpret the degree of social complexity on the basis of qualitative and quantitative parameters of material culture, evidence of production activities and their specialization level in correlation with spatial distribution of intra-site activity areas. Moreover, the detected tendencies are independently confirmed by the morpho-typological differences between gold and bronze artefacts contained in hoards, by architectonic details and by the presence of regular ritual activities. The achieved results thus indicate possible horizontal and vertical ranking, which was adapted to the local community.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
References
Bátora, J., 1982. Ekonomicko-sociálny vývoj východného Slovenska v staršej dobe bronzovej [Socio-economic development of Eastern Slovakia in the Early Bronze Age]. Slovenská Archeológia 30, 249–314.Google Scholar
Bátora, J., 1991. The reflection of economy and social structure in the cemeteries of the Chlopice-Veselé and Nitra cultures. Slovenská Archeológia 39, 91–142.Google Scholar
Bátora, J., 1999. Gräber mit Totenhäusern auf frühbronzezeitlichen Gräbefeldern in der Slowakei (Beitrag zu Kulturverbindungen zwischen Mittel-, West- und Osteuropa) [The death houses from Early Bronze Age burial grounds in Slovakia (Contribution to the contacts between Middle, Eastern, and Western Europe)]. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 74, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bátora, J., 2009. Metallurgy and Early Bronze Age fortified settlements in Slovakia. Slovenská Archeológia 57, 195–219.Google Scholar
Bátora, J., 2018. Slovensko v staršej dobe bronzovej [Slovakia in the Early Bronze Age]. Bratislava: Comenius University.Google Scholar
Bátora, J. & Vladár, J., 2015. Kultúry staršej doby bronzovej [Early Bronze Age cultures], in Staré Slovensko 4: Doba bronzová [Old Slovakia 4: Bronze Age], eds Furmánek, V., Bátora, J., Ožďáni, O., Mitáš, V., Kujovský, R. & Vladár, J.. Nitra: Institute of Archaeology SAS, 21–130.Google Scholar
Belanová Štolcová, T. & Grömer, K., 2010. Loom-weights, spindles and textiles – textile production in Central Europe from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age, in North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X, eds Andersson Strand, E.B., Gleba, M., Mannering, U., Munkholt, C. & Ringgard, M.. Oxford: Oxbow, 9–20.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1983. In the Pursuit of the Past. Decoding the archeological record. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blankholm, H.P., 1991. Intrasite Spatial Analysis in Theory and Practise. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Brück, J. & Fokkens, H., 2013. Bronze age settlements, in The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age, eds Fokkens, H. & Harding, A.F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 82–101.Google Scholar
Brück, J. & Fontijn, D., 2013. The myth of the chief: prestige goods, power and personhood in the European Bronze Age, in The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age, eds Fokkens, H. & Harding, A.F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197–215.Google Scholar
Budden, S., 2008. Skill amongst the sherds: understanding the role of skill in the Early to Late Middle Bronze Age in Hungary, in Breaking the Mould: Challenging the past through pottery, ed. Berg, I.. Oxford: Archaeopress, 1–17.Google Scholar
Choyke, A.M. & Bartosiewicz, L., 2009. Telltale tools from a tell: bone and antler manufacturing at Bronze Age Jászdózsa-Kápolnahalom, Hungary. Tisicum 19, 357–75.Google Scholar
Choyke, A.M., Vretemark, M. & Sten, S., 2004. Levels of social identity expressed in the refuse and worked bone from Middle Bronze Age Százhalombatta-Földvár, Vatya culture, Hungary, in Behaviour Behind Bones: The zooarchaeology of ritual, religion, status and identity, eds O'Day, S.J., Van Neer, W. & Ervynck, A.. Oxford: Oxbow, 177–89.Google Scholar
Costin, C.L., 1991. Craft specialization: issues in defining, documenting and explaining the organization of production, in Archaeological Method and Theory 3, ed. Schiffer, M.B.. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press, 1–56.Google Scholar
Costin, C.L., 1996. Exploring the relationship between gender and craft in complex societies: methodological and theoretical framework, in Gender and Archaeology, ed. Wright, R.P.. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press, 111–40.Google Scholar
Costin, C.L., 2005. Craft production, in Handbook of Methods in Archaeology, eds Maschner, H.D.G & Chippindale, C.. Lanham (MD): AltaMira, 1032–1105.Google Scholar
Dani, J., 2012. Fortified tell settlements from the Middle Bronze Age in the Hungarian reach of the Berettyó Valley, in Enclosed Space – Open Society: Contact and exchange in the context of Bronze Age fortified settlements in central Europe, eds Jaeger, M., Czebreszuk, J. & Fischl, K.P.. Poznań/Bonn: Wydawnictwo Naukowe/Rudolf Habelt, 27–37.Google Scholar
Dani, J., Fischl, K.P., Kulcsár, G., Szeverényi, V. & Kiss, V., 2016. Visible and invisible inequality: changing patterns of wealth consumption in Early and Middle Bronze Age Hungary. Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 14, 219–41.Google Scholar
David-Elbiali, M., 2017. Soziale Ungleichheit in bronzezeitlichen Frauen- und Männergräbern Europas [Social inequality of male and female graves in Bronze Age Europe], in Rebellion and Inequality in Archaeology, eds Hansen, S. & Müller, J.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 205–50.Google Scholar
Davis, K. & Moore, W.E., 1945. Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review 10(2), 242–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, P.R., 2014. Complexity and Autonomy in Bronze Age Europe: Assessing cultural developments in eastern Hungary. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Duffy, P.R., 2015. Site size hierarchy in middle-range societies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 37, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, P.R, Parkinson, W.A., Gyucha, A. & Yerkes, R.W., 2013. Coming together, falling apart. A multiscalar approach to prehistoric aggregation and interaction on the Great Hungarian Plain, in From Prehistoric Villages to Cities: Settlement aggregation and community transformation, ed. Birch, J.. New York (NY): Routledge, 44–62.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., [1933] 1960. The Division of Labor in Society (trans. G. Simpson). Glencoe (IL): Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Earle, T. & Kolb, J.M., 2010. Regional settlement patterns, in Organising Bronze Age Societies, eds Earle, T. & Kristiansen, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, T., Kreiter, A., Klehm, C., Ferguson, J. & Vicze, M., 2011. Bronze Age economy: the Benta Valley, Hungary. European Journal of Archaeology 14(3), 419–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, T. & Kristiansen, K. (eds), 2010a. Organising Bronze Age Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, T. & Kristiansen, K., 2010b. Organising Bronze Age societies: concluding thoughts, in Organising Bronze Age Societies, eds Earle, T. & Kristiansen, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 218–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, F., Hänsel, B. & Medović, P., 2016. Feudvar near Mošorin (Serbia) – excavations and research in a micro-region at the confluence of the Danube and Tisza: a recapitulation after thirty years, in Die Archäobotanik: Feudvar III [The archaeobotany: Feudvar III], eds Kroll, H. & Reed, K.. Würzburg: Würzburg University Press, 5–35.Google Scholar
Fischl, K.P., 2012. The role of the Hernád Valley in the settlement structure of the Füzesabony culture, in Enclosed Space – Open Society: Contact and exchange in the context of Bronze Age fortified settlements in central Europe, eds Jaeger, M., Czebreszuk, J. & Fischl, K.P.. Poznań/Bonn: Wydawnictwo Naukowe/Rudolf Habelt, 39–51.Google Scholar
Fischl, K.P., Kiss, V. & Kulcsár, G., 2013a. Specialised households in the Carpathian Basin during the Early and Middle Bronze Age, in Bronze Age Crafts and Craftsmen in the Carpathian Basin, eds Rezi, B., Németh, R.E. & Berecki, S.. Târgu Mureş: Editura Mega, 9–22.Google Scholar
Fischl, K.P., Kiss, V., Kulcsár, G. & Szeverényi, V., 2013b. Transformations in the Carpathian Basin around 1600 B.C. Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 9, 355–71.Google Scholar
Furmánek, V., Veliačik, L. & Vladár, J., 1991. Slovensko v dobe bronzovej [Slovakia in the Bronze Age]. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Gilman, A., 1981. The development of social stratification in Bronze Age Europe. Current Anthropology 22(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gogâltan, F., 2010. Die Tells und der Urbanisierungsprozess, in Siedlung und Handwerk: Studien zu socialen Kontexten in der Bronzezeit, eds Horejs, B. & Kienlin, T.L.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 13–46.Google Scholar
Gumerman, G., 1997. Food and complex societies. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4(2), 105–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, S. & Müller, J. (eds), 2017. Rebellion and inequality in archaeology. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Harding, A.F., 2000. European Societies in the Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, A.F., 2015. The emergence of elite identities in Bronze Age Europe. Origini 37(1), 111–21.Google Scholar
Harding, A.F., 2018. The question of ‘proto-urban’ sites in Later Prehistoric Europe. Origini 41(2), 307–28.Google Scholar
Hladíková, L., 2003–2004. Štípaná industrie starší doby bronzové. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity – Řada M 8–9, 65–87.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982. Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1994. The interpretation of documents and material culture, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, eds Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S.. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage, 393–402.Google Scholar
Horváth, T., 2012. Metallurgy of the Vatya Culture – technological observations on the stone tools of the culture, in Enclosed Space – Open Society: Contact and exchange in the context of Bronze Age fortified settlements in central Europe, eds Jaeger, M., Czebreszuk, J. & Fischl, K.P.. Poznań/Bonn: Wydawnictwo Naukowe/ Rudolf Habelt, 53–115.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M., 2014. The stone fortifications of the settlement at Spišský Štvrtok. A contribution to the discussion on the long-distance contacts of the Otomani-Füzesabony culture. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 89, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, M., 2016. Bronze Age Fortified Settlements in Central Europe. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Nauka i Innowacje.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M., 2017. Bronze Age defensive settlement in the context of long-range relationships: how far is it from fortified villages to citadels?, in Rebellion and Inequality in Archaeology, eds Hansen, S. & Müller, J.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 186–205.Google Scholar
Jakab, J., 1978. International interference on the skeletons of the Otomani people found at the cultic objekt in Spišský Štvrtok. Anthropologie 16, 139–41.Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A., 1990. Bronzezeitlicher Burgenbau in Mitteleuropa. Untersuchungen zur Struktur frühmetallzeitlicher Gesellschaften [Bronze Age hillforts in Middle Europe. Study on the social structure in the early metal period], in Orientalisch-Ägäische Einflüsse in der Europäischen Bronzezeit [Oriental and Aegean influences in the European Bronze Age], ed. Schauer, P.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 209–28.Google Scholar
Jongsma, T. & Greenfield, H.J., 2002. The household as behaviour: an anthropological perspective, in Material Evidence and Cultural Pattern in Prehistory, ed. Nikolova, L.. (Reports of Prehistoric Research Project 5.) Karlovo: International Institute of Anthropology, 1–11.Google Scholar
Juteau, D., 2003. Introducing social differentiation, in Social Differentiation. Patterns and processes, ed. Juteau, D.. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaňáková, L., 2014. Unikátní soubor štípané industrie doby bronzové z polohy Blučina–Cezavy [The unique assemblage of Bronze Age chipped stone industry from the Blučina–Cezavy site]. Památky archeologické 105, 5–46.Google Scholar
Kaňáková Hladíková, L., 2013. Posteneolitická štípaná industrie na Moravě [Post-eneolithic chipped stone industries in Moravia]. Brno: Masaryk University.Google Scholar
Kerbo, H.R, 2003. Social Stratification and Inequality. Class conflict in historical, comparative, and global perspective. Boston (MA): McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Kerbo, H.R., 2006. Social stratification, in 21st Century Sociology: A reference handbook, eds Bryant, C.D. & Peck, D.L.. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage, 228–36.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T.L., 2012. Beyond elites: an introduction, in Beyond Elites: Alternatives to hierarchical systems in modelling social formations, eds Kienlin, T.L. & Zimmermann, A.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 15–32.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T.L., 2015. Bronze Age Tell Communities in Context. An exploration into culture, society, and the study of European prehistory – Part 1. Critique: Europe and the Mediterranean. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T.L., 2018. Borsod Region Bronze Age settlement: ‘diversity in uniformity’, in Borsod Region Bronze Age Settlement (BORBAS), eds Kienlin, T.L., Fischl, K.P. & Pusztai, T.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 11–91.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T.L., Fischl, K.P. & Marta, L., 2017. Exploring divergent trajectories in Bronze Age landscapes: tell settlement in the Hungarian Borsod Plain and the Romanian Ier Valley. Ziridava Studia Archaeologica 31, 93–128.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T.L. & Stöllner, T., 2009. Singen copper, alpine settlement and Early Bronze Age mining: is there a need for elites and strongholds?, in Metals and Societies: Studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway, eds Kienlin, T.L. & Roberts, B.W.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 67–104.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T.L. & Zimmermann, A. (eds), 2012. Beyond Elites: Alternatives to hierarchical systems in modelling social formations. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Kraus, J., 2006. Die soziale Differenzierung der östlichen Aunjetitzer Kultur in den Bronzezeitstufen A2 und A3 [The social differentiation of the eastern Únětice culture in the Bronze Age stages A2 and A3]. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 1998. The formation of tribal systems in northern Europe, 4000–500 BC, in Social Transformations in Archaeology. Global and local perspectives, eds Kristiansen, K. & Rowlands, M.. London/New York: Routledge, 64–102.Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M.H.G., 2008. Bronze Age Metalworking in the Netherlands (c. 2000–800 BC). A research into the preservation of metallurgy related artefacts and the social position of the smith. Leiden: Sidestone.Google Scholar
Laabs, J., 2014. Ein Beitrag zur sozioökonomischen Differenzierung Aunjetitzer Bestattungssitten auf regionaler und überregionaler Ebene [Contribution to the socioeconomic differentiation of the funerary traditions of Únětice culture at the regional and trans-regional level]. Offa 67/68, 79–128.Google Scholar
Lenski, G.E., 1966. Power and Privilege: A theory of social stratification. New York (NY): McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Marková, K. & Ilon, G., 2013. Slovakia and Hungary, in The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age, eds Fokkens, H. & Harding, A.F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 813–36.Google Scholar
Meller, H., Hahn, H.P., Jung, R. & Risch, R. (eds), 2016. Rich and Poor – Competing for resources in prehistoric societies. Halle: Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte.Google Scholar
Michelaki, K., 2008. Making pots and potters in the Bronze Age Maros villages of Kiszombor-Új-Élet and Klárafalva-Hajdova. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(3), 355–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittnik, A., Massy, K., Knipper, C., et al. ., 2019. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science 366, 731–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molnár, Z. & Nagy, J.G., 2013. Habitat models and social systems in Middle Bronze Age central north-western Transylvania. State of research. Acta Archaeologica Carpathica 48, 5–85.Google Scholar
Müller, J., 2015. Bronze Age social practices: demography and economy. Forging long-distance exchange, in Forging Identities. The mobility of culture in Bronze Age Europe: Volume 1, eds Suchowska-Ducke, P., Reiter, S.S. & Vankilde, H.. (BAR International series 2771.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports Oxford, 231–6.Google Scholar
Müller, J. & Diachenko, A., 2019. Tracing long-term demographic changes: the issue of spatial scales. PLoS ONE 14(1): e0208739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicodemus, A.J. & Lemke, A.K., 2016. Specialized bone working in the Bronze Age? The organization of production at Pecica-Şanţul Mare, Romania. Cuadernos 3(2), 103–20.Google Scholar
Novotná, M., 1983. Metalurgia opevnených osád [Metallurgy at the fortified settlements]. Archeologické rozhledy 35, 63–71.Google Scholar
O‘Shea, J.M., 1996. Villagers of the Maros: A portrait of an Early Bronze Age society. New York (NY): Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olexa, L., 1987. Gräber von Metallgießern in Nižná Myšľa [Graves of metallurgists in Nižná Myšľa]. Archeologické rozhledy 39, 255–75.Google Scholar
Olexa, L., 2003. Nižná Myšľa: Osada a pohrebisko z doby bronzovej [Nižná Myšľa: The settlement and necropolis in the Early Bronze Age]. Nitra: Institute of Archaeology SAS.Google Scholar
Olexa, L. & Nováček, T., 2013. Pohrebisko zo staršej doby bronzovej v Nižnej Myšli: Katalóg I (hroby 1–310) [Early Bronze Age necropolis in Nižná Myšľa: Catalogue I (graves 1–310)]. Nitra: Institute of Archaeology SAS.Google Scholar
Olexa, L. & Nováček, T., 2015. Pohrebisko zo staršej doby bronzovej v Nižnej Myšli: Katalóg II (hroby 311–499) [Early Bronze Age necropolis in Nižná Myšľa: Catalogue II (graves 311–499)]. Nitra: Institute of Archaeology SAS.Google Scholar
Olexa, L. & Nováček, T., 2017. Pohrebisko zo staršej doby bronzovej v Nižnej Myšli: Katalóg III (hroby 500–792) [Early Bronze Age necropolis in Nižná Myšľa: Catalogue III (graves 500–792)]. Nitra: Institute of Archaeology SAS.Google Scholar
Oravkinová, D., 2018. Výšinné opevnené sídlisko otomanskej kultúry v Spišskom Štvrtku v kontexte karpatského kultúrneho vývoja [Hillfort fortified settlement of Otomani culture in Spišský Štvrtok in the context of Carpathian Basin cultural development]. Unpublished PhD thesis, Comenius University/Institute of Archaeology SAS.Google Scholar
Oravkinová, D., Hromadová, B. & Vlačiky, M., 2017. Kostená a parohová industria z výšinného opevneného sídliska v Spišskom Štvrtku [Bone and antler artefacts from fortified settlements in Spišský Štvrtok]. Slovenská Archeológia 65, 23–80.Google Scholar
Oravkinová, D. & Vladár, J., 2019a. The phenomenon of hoarding at the fortified settlement in Spišský Štvrtok, in Beyond Divides – The Otomani-Füzesabony Phenomenon, eds Fischl, K. P. & Kienlin, T.L.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 83–119.Google Scholar
Oravkinová, D. & Vladár, J., 2019b. Chronological framework of the fortified settlement in Spišsský Štvrtok in the context of the Otomani-Füzesabony cultural complex. Studia Hercynia 23(2), 150–72.Google Scholar
Parkinson, W.A., 2002. Introduction: archaeology and tribal societies, in The Archaeology of Tribal Societies, ed. Parkinson, W.A.. (International Monographs in Prehistory: Archaeological series 15.) New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1–12.Google Scholar
Petřík, J., Prokeš, L., Všianský, D., Salaš, M. & Nikolajev, P., 2016. Organization of ceramic production at a fortified Early Bronze Age settlement in Moravia (Czech Republic) inferred from minimally destructive archaeometry. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 10(3), 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebay-Salisbury, K, Brysbaert, A. & Foxhall, L., 2014. Material cross-overs: introduction, in Material Crossovers: Knowledge networks and the movement of technological knowledge between craft traditions, eds Rebay-Salisbury, K., Brysbaert, A. & Foxhall, L.. London: Routledge, 1–6.Google Scholar
Rebay-Salisbury, K., Pany-Kucera, D., Spannagl-Steiner, M., Kanz, F., Galeta, P., Teschler-Nicola, M. & Salisbury, R.B., 2018. Motherhood at Early Bronze Age Unterhautzenthal, Lower Austria. Archaeologia Austriaca 102, 71–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. & Bahn, P., 1991. Archaeology: Theories, methods and practice. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Rice, P.M., 1987. Pottery Analysis: A sourcebook. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Risch, R., 2008. From production traces to social organisation: towards an epistemology of functional analysis, in ‘Prehistoric Technology’ 40 Years Later: Functional studies and the Russian legacy, eds Longo, L. & Skakun, N.. Oxford: Archaeopress, 513–21.Google Scholar
Risch, R., Meller, H. & Gronenborn, D., 2018. Preface of the editors, in Surplus without the State – Political forms in prehistory, eds Meller, H., Gronenborn, D. & Risch, R.. Halle: Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte, 9–19.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M.J., 1971. The archaeological interpretation of prehistoric metalworking. World Archaeology 3(2), 210–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, C.P. & Ciugudean, H., 2018. Settlement placement and socio-economic priorities: dynamic landscapes in Bronze Age Transylvania. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 19, 936–48.Google Scholar
Santacreu, D.A., 2014. Materiality, Techniques and Society in Pottery Production: The technological study of archaeological ceramics through paste analysis.Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, M.B., 1975. Behavioral chain analysis: activities, organization, and the use of space, in Fieldiana. Anthropology 65. Chicago (IL): Field Museum of Natural History, 103–19.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B., 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Service, E.R., 1962. Primitive Social Organization: An evolutionary prespective. New York (NY): Random House.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C., 1988. Social Theory and Archaeology. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Shennan, S., 1993. Settlement and social change in central Europe, 3500–1500 BC. Journal of World Prehistory 7(2), 121–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sofaer, J., 2006. Pots, houses and metal: technological relations at the Bronze Age tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 25(2), 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sofaer, J., 2010. Technology and craft, in Organising Bronze Age Societies, eds Earle, T. & Kristiansen, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sofaer, J., Jørgensen, L. Bender & Choyke, A. M., 2013. Craft production: ceramics, textiles and bone, in The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age, eds Fokkens, H. & Harding, A.F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 469–92.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. & Budden, S., 2012. Many hands make light work: potting and embodied knowledge at the Bronze Age tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary, in Embodied Knowledge: Historical perspectives on belief and technology, eds Sørensen, M.L.S. & Rebay-Salisbury, K.. Oxford: Oxbow, 117–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosna, D., 2009. Social Differentiation in the Late Copper Age and the Early Bronze Age in South Moravia (Czech Republic). (BAR International series 1994.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, M.L.S. & Vicze, M., 2013. Locating household activities on a Bronze Age tell, in Archaeology of Household, eds Madella, M., Kovács, G., Kulcsarne-Berzsenyi, B. & Briz i Godino, I.. Oxford: Oxbow, 159–78.Google Scholar
Stark, M.T., 1991. Ceramic production and community specialization: a Kalinga ethnoarchaeological study. World Archaeology 23(1), 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šteiner, P., 2015. Loom-weights of the Otomani-Füzesabony cultural complex from Barca I, in Keď bronz vystriedal meď. Zborník príspevkov z XXIII. Medzinárodného sympózia ‘Staršia doba bronzová v Čechách, na Morave a na Slovensku’ [When bronze replaced copper. Proceedigs of the 23rd International symposium ‘Early Bronze Age in central Europe’], eds Bátora, J. & Tóth, P.. Bratislava/Nitra: Comenius University/Institute of Archaeology SAS, 261–70.Google Scholar
Szabová, L., 2018. Metallurgical object no. 519 from Nižná Myšľa. Unpublished poster presentation, at the conference ‘Settlement layouts, system and structure of the Otomani-Füzesabony Cultural Complex’, 7–9 June 2018, Miskolc, Hungary.Google Scholar
Szeverényi, V. & Kulcsár, G., 2012. Middle Bronze Age settlement and society in central Hungary, in Enclosed Space – Open Society: Contact and exchange in the context of Bronze Age fortified settlements in central Europe, eds Jaeger, M., Czebreszuk, J. & Fischl, K. P.. Poznań/Bonn: Wydawnictwo Naukowe/ Rudolf Habelt, 287–351.Google Scholar
Tainter, J.A., 1978. Mortuary practices and the study of prehistoric social systems. Advances in Archaeological Theory and Method 1, 105–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, N., Kneisel, J., Dal Corso, M., Kirleis, W., Scholz, H. & Tiedtke, V., 2015. The third food revolution or setting the Bronze Age table: an introduction, in The Third Food Revolution? Setting the Bronze Age table: common trends in economic and subsistence strategies in Bronze Age Europe, eds Kneisel, J., Dal Corso, M., Kirleis, W., Scholz, H., Taylor, N. & Tiedtke, V.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 14–19.Google Scholar
Točík, A., 1982. Beitrag zur Problematik befestigter Siedlungen in der Südwestslowakei während der älteren und zu Beginn der mittleren Bronzezeit [Contribution towards the fortified settlements in southwestern Slovakia in the Early Bronze Age and the beginning of the Middle Bronze Age], in Beiträge zum bronzezeitlichen Burgenbau in Mitteleuropa [Studies on the Bronze Age hillforts in Central Europe], eds Chropovský, B. & Herrmann, J.. Berlin/Nitra: Institute of Archaeology SAS, 405–16.Google Scholar
Tóth, P., Oravkinová, D. & Pokutta, D.A., 2019. Settlement organisation of the Otomani-Füzesabony Cultural Complex in Slovakia. A spatio-temporal modelling study, in Beyond Divides – The Otomani-Füzesabony phenomenon, eds Fischl, K.P. & Kienlin, T.L.. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 47–69.Google Scholar
Vicze, M., 2013. Middle Bronze Age Households at Százhalombatta-Földvár, in Moments in Time: Papers presented to Pál Raczky on his 60th birthday, eds Anders, A. & Kulcsár, G.. Budapest: L‘Harmattan, 757–69.Google Scholar
Vitezović, S., 2013. From artefacts to behaviour: technological analyses in prehistory, in Anthropologie 51(2), 175–94.Google Scholar
Vladár, J., 1973. Osteuropäische und mediterrane Einflüsse im Gebiet der Slowakei während der Bronzezeit [Eastern European and Mediterranean influences in Slovakia during the Bronze Age]. Slovenská Archeológia 21, 253–357.Google Scholar
Vladár, J., 1975. Spišský Štvrtok. Opevnená osada otomanskej kultúry. III. Medzinárodný kongres slovanskej archeológie – Bratislava, 7.–14. september 1975 [Spišský Štvrtok. Fortified settlement of the Otomani culture. III. International congress of Slavic Archaeology – Bratislava, 7–14 September 1975]. Nitra: Nitrianske tlačiarne.Google Scholar
Vladár, J., 1982. Die frühbronzezeitliche Entwicklung der Slowakei und das Aufkommen der befestigten Siedlungen [The Early Bronze Age in Slovakia and the emergence of the fortified settlements], in Beiträge zum bronzezeitlichen Burgenbau in Mitteleuropa [Studies on the Bronze Age hillforts in Central Europe], eds Chropovský, B. & Herrmann, J.. Berlin/Nitra: Institute of Archaeology SAS, 437–53.Google Scholar
Wason, P.K., 1994. The Archaeology of Rank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, J., Sheehan, O., Atkinson, Q.D., Bulbulia, J. & Gray, R.D., 2016. Ritual human sacrifice promoted and sustained the evolution of stratified societies. Nature 532, 228–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H., 2002. Modes of religiosity: towards a cognitive explanation of the sociopolitical dynamics of religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oravkinová and Vladár supplementary material
Oravkinová and Vladár supplementary material
File
30 KB