¹ See any of 10 Cl. & F. at p. 205; 4 St. Tr. (N. S.) at p. 296; 31 Arch. 14; 1923, Cmd. 2005, at p. 23; East, Forensic Psychiatry, 55; Kenny, Select Cases, 44; Stephen, II History of Criminal Law, 155.

² State v. Jones (1871) 50 N. H. 369.Google Scholar

³ 4 St. Tr. (N. S.) at p. 925.

⁴ Hadfield (1800) 27 St. Tr. at pp. 1313—1314Google Scholar; 67 Hansard, 719.

⁵ Bellingham (1812) 1 Collinson on Lunatics, 636.Google Scholar

⁶ E.g., Indian Penal Code, s. 84. In nearly all the United States of America: Weihofen, Insanity as a Defence in Criminal Law, 46.

⁷ Sodeman (1936) 55 Comm. L. R. 230; W. N. 190Google Scholar; 2 All E. R. 1138. The State of Alabama established this Eule by cases, and changed it by the 1928 Code, ‘to the reasonable satisfaction of the jury.’

⁸ Phipson, , Evidence, 10.Google Scholar

⁹ Phipson, , 34.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Hadfield (1800) 27 St. Tr. at p. 1354.Google Scholar

¹¹ Hewart, , Essays and Observations, 213Google Scholar; 5 Journal of Criminal Law, at p. 267.

¹² Oxford (1840) 9 C. & P. at p. 533.Google Scholar

¹³ Stokes (1848) 3 Car. & Kir. 185.Google Scholar

¹⁴ A.-G. v. Boylan [1937] I. R. at p. 456Google Scholar; and A.-G. v. Fennell [1940] I. R. at p. 449.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Phipson, , 34Google Scholar; and cites Bigham J. in Jefferson (1908) Times, 20 July.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Godere (1016) 12 C. A. R. at p. 27.Google Scholar

¹⁷ E.g., Schwartz v. State (1902) 65 Nebraska, 196 (S.C.).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Lockhart (1939) Telegraph, 20 Nov.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Stephen, , II Hist. 149Google Scholar; and Digest of the Criminal Law, s. 38 (b), and note 6.

²⁰ 1 Taylor, Medical Jurisprudence, 807.

²¹ Codere (1916) 12 C. A. R. at pp. 27—28.Google Scholar

²² Proprietary Articles Trade Association v. A.-G. for Canada [1931] A. C. at p. 324.Google Scholar

²³ See also IV Criminal Law Journal, at p. 87.Google Scholar

²⁴ People v. Schmidt (1915) 216 N. Y. 324.Google Scholar

²⁵ XCI Review of Amer. J. Psych. 137.

²⁶ Indian Penal Code, s. 84. See also for Scotland, H.M. Advocate v. Sharp [1927] S. C. (J.) 66.Google Scholar

²⁷ 1 Taylor, 815.

²⁸ Stephen, II Hist. 162. Also 2 Journ. Crim. Law, 539.

²⁹ Hewart, , Essays, 224.Google Scholar

³⁰ East, Medical Aspects of Crime, Cap. VII, for a careful description, with charts.

³¹ East, , Forensic Psych. 58Google Scholar; 1 Taylor, 815.

³² British Medical Journal, 1924, 16 Feb.Google Scholar

³³ Waring v. Waring (1848) 6 Moo. P. C. 341.Google Scholar

³⁴ Gilbert (1914) 11 C. A. R. at p. 25.Google Scholar

³⁵ Wright (1821) R. & R. 456.Google Scholar

³⁶ Francis (1842) 4 Cox, 57.Google Scholar

³⁷ 4 St. Tr. (N. S.) at p. 923.

³⁸ Stephen, , II Hist. 183.Google Scholar

³⁹ Mason (1912) 76 J. P. 184.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Aveson v. Kinnaird (1805) 6 East, 188.Google Scholar

⁴¹ 1923, Cmd. 2005, at p. 10.

⁴² Mass. Acts, 1929, Cap. 105.

⁴³ State v. Strasburg (1910) 60 Wash. 106.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ See Arridy v. People (1938) 82 Pac. (2nd) 757Google Scholar; where, in spite of the experts' opinion, popular opinion was too strong, and accused was convicted and executed.

⁴⁵ See Hay (1911) 22 Cox, 268.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ See Jefferson (1908) 1 C. A. R. 95.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ J. W. and Tibbie, Anne, Clare, John, 385, 393, 397, 417.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ 1 Taylor, 759, 811.

⁴⁹ G. Bernard Shaw.

⁵⁰ Brazol, , Elements of Crime, 302.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Kindred, , 1934, Amer. Jour. Psych. 137.Google Scholar

⁵² For a good example, see 1923, Cmd. at pp. 31 and 4.

⁵³ 1923, Cmd. 2005, at pp. 9 and 21.

⁵⁴ Sullivan, , Crime and Insanity, 122.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ 10 Cl. & F. 201; 4 St. Tr. (N. S.) 923.

⁵⁶ 10 Cl. & F. 202. The case of True in 1922 brought about the appointment of Lord Birkenhead's Committee of that year.

⁵⁷ Stephen, , II Hist. 154Google Scholar; Sullivan, , 230.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ E.g., in 1865, 1874, 1879, 1922.

⁵⁹ E.g., Bramwell B., Insanity and Crime, Nineteenth Century, Deo. 1885; Hewart, , Essays and Observations, 215.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ E.g., 1923, Cmd. 2005, p. 21.

⁶¹ True (1922) 16 C. A. R. at p. 170.Google Scholar

⁶² Notably, Bramwell B., and Hewart L.C.J.

⁶³ Stephen, , II Hist. 152Google Scholar; 1 Taylor, 801; Theobald, , Law Relating to Lunacy, 244.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ See discussion, post.

⁶⁵ Sullivan, , Crime and Insanity, 231.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Felstead [1914] A. C. 534; 10 C. A. R. 129.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Weihofen, , 46.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Marjoribanks, , Life of Sir Edward Marshall Hall, 390.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ ProfJefferson, , Lecture, ‘Manchester Guardian,’ 20 01 1944.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Dr. Bay. Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity.

⁷¹ A.-G. v. O'Brien [1936] I. R. at p. 269.Google Scholar

⁷² See references to it, post.

⁷³ 1923, Cmd. 2005.

⁷⁴ XVII Parl. Debates (5th Series); Hewart, , Essays and Observations, 225; also Cap. XXIX.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Like Baron Bramwell, Lord Hewart appears to have been a firm believer in tlio efficacy of the threat of punishment.

⁷⁶ Armstrong (1922) 16 C. A. R. at p. 160Google Scholar. See also on juries, Morris, , Criminology, 283.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ 1 Taylor, 812; Gour, , Indian Penal Code, 321.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Maule J. in Tucker (1844) 1 Cox, 103Google Scholar; Cox J. in U. S. v. Guiteau (1882) 10 Fed. 161.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ DrMonro, , 4 St. Tr. (N. S.) 847.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Christie, , 10 Medico-Legal and Criminological Review, 13.Google Scholar

⁸¹ East, , Forensic Psych. 83Google Scholar; Perry (1919) 14 C. A. R. 48.Google Scholar

⁸² 1 Taylor, 814.

⁸³ 1 Taylor, 828.

⁸⁴ 4 Criminal Law Jour. 82.

⁸⁵ 1 Taylor, 815—819.

⁸⁶ 1 Taylor, 843.

⁸⁷ De Quiros, , Modern Theories of Criminality, 8, 49Google Scholar; Burton (1863) 3 F. & F. 772.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Darling J. in Harding (1908) 1 C. A. R. at p. 223Google Scholar; State v. Soper (1899), 148 Mo. at p. 237.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ 1 Taylor, 762; Vaughan (1844) 1 Cox, 80.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Alexander (1913) 9 C. A. R. at p. 141Google Scholar; Lesbini (1914) 11 C. A. R. 7.Google Scholar

⁹¹ East, , Forensic Psych. 21—22.Google Scholar

⁹² U. S. v. Guiteau (1882) 10 Fed. 161.Google Scholar

⁹³ Southey (1865) 4 F. & F. 864.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Stroud, , Mens Bea, 195—209.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ 1923, Cmd. 2005, at p. 9.

⁹⁶ Davies, D. Seaborne, 17 Can. Bar Review, 147.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Stokes (1848) 3 C. & K. 185.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Barton (1848) 3 Cox, 275.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Brough (1856) 1 F. & F, 667 n.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Haynes (1859) 1 F. & F. 666.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Burton (1863) 3 F. & F. 772.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Thomas (1911) 7 C. A. R. 36.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Pank (1919) Times, 22 May.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Holt (1920) 15 C. A. R. 10.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Quarmby (1921) 15 C. A. R. 163.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ True (1922) 16 C. A. R. at p. 170.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ Kopsch (1925) 19 C. A. R. at p. 51.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Flavell (1926) 19 C. A. R. at p. 143.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Weihofen, , 32.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Rhode Island.

¹¹¹ New Hampshire.

¹¹² Creighton (1909) 14 Can. Crim. C. 349.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Jessamime (1912) 32 C. L. T. 280.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Deighton (1900) 18 N. Z. L. R. 891.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ A.-G. v. O'Brien [1936] I. R. 263.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ Sodeman [1936] 2 All E. R. 1138Google Scholar; W. N. 190. Por a full discussion, see Barry, , Insanity in the Criminal Law of Australia; Can. Bar. Review, 427Google Scholar; or English Studies in Criminal Science Pamphlet, 8—12.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ Stephen, , II Hist. Cap. XIX.Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Stephen, , II Hist. 149Google Scholar; Digest, Stephen, Art. 38.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Sullivan, , Crime and Insanity, 229Google Scholar; East, , Forensic Psych. 61Google Scholar; Noyer, , Text-book on Psychiatry, 58Google Scholar; Mercier, , Crime and Insanity. 240Google Scholar; 1 Taylor, 815.

¹²⁰ Sullivan, , Crime and Insanity, 231.Google Scholar

¹²¹ Lees-Smith (1943) Daily Telegraph, 17 and 18 March.Google Scholar

¹²² 27 St. Tr. 1281.

¹²³ 67 Hansard, 719—20.

¹²⁴ Oxford (1840) 9 C. & P. at p. 546.Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Jorden (1872) 1 Taylor, 881.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Gill (1883) Oppenheimer, Criminal Responsibility.Google Scholar

¹²⁷ Duncan (1890) Renton, Law and Practice of Lunacy, 908.Google Scholar

¹²⁸ Prince (1898) 1 Taylor, 881.Google Scholar

¹²⁹ Jones (1910) 4 C. A. R. at pp. 217—218.Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Hay (1911) 22 Cox, 268.Google Scholar

¹³¹ Jolly (1919) 83 J. P. 296.Google Scholar

¹³² True (1922) Daily Telegraph, 6 MayGoogle Scholar; Notable British Trials, The Trial of Ronald True, 255Google Scholar; 16 C. A. R. at p. 165.

¹³³ Burton (1936) 100 J. P. 306.Google Scholar

¹³⁴ Lees-Smith (1943) Daily Telegraph, 17 and 18 March.Google Scholar

¹³⁵ Conybeare, , Text-book of Medicine, 307Google Scholar. See also Hyslop, , The Borderland, 28.Google Scholar

¹³⁶ State v. Thompson (1834) Wright's Ohio Reps, at p. 622.Google Scholar

¹³⁷ Clark v. State (1843) 12 Ohio, at p. 495.Google Scholar

¹³⁸ Comm. v. Rogers (1844) 7 Metc. (Mass.) 500.Google Scholar

¹³⁹ Bradley v. State (1869) 31 Ind. 492.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Parsons v. State (1886) 31 Ala. 577.Google Scholar

¹⁴¹ Weihofen, , 15.Google Scholar

¹⁴² 1923, Cmd. 2005, p. 9.

¹⁴³ Hay (1899) 16 Cape of Good Hope (S. C.) 290.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁴ Smit (1906) T. S. 783.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁵ 1923, Cmd, 2005, p. 9: 24.

¹⁴⁶ See reference 116, above.

¹⁴⁷ They have not been brought up in the belief of Baron Bramwell in the effectiveness of punishment.

¹⁴⁸ Stephen, , II Hist, 155.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁹ 1 Taylor, 801; Sullivan, , 231Google Scholar; 1 Wharton, and Stillé, , Medical Jurisprudence, 555.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁰ Notably Bramwell B. and Hewart L.C.J.

¹⁵¹ Bellingham (1812) 1 Collinson on Lunatics, 636Google Scholar. See also Ray, , Treatise on Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity.Google Scholar

¹⁵² E.g. Bowler (1812) East, Forensic Psychiatry, 51Google Scholar; 1 Taylor, 804.

¹⁵³ Jefferson (1908) 1 C. A. R. 95.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁴ 1 Taylor, 821.

¹⁵⁵ gee notes 133 and 134.

¹⁵⁶ Parsons v. State (1886) 81 Ala. 577.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁷ Sodeman (1936) 55 Comm. L. R. 192.Google Scholar