Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T02:05:49.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentary: Problems of Patient and Professional Responsibilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2011


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Ethics Committees and Consultants at Work
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


1. Liver Transplant; available at (last accessed 26 Jul 2010).

2. Dyer, P, McGuinness, S. The organ allocation algorithm. In: Transplantation and Organ Deficit in the UK: Pragmatic Solutions to Ethical Controversy (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar.

3. Cronin, A, Price, D. Directed organ donation: Is the donor the owner? Clinical Ethics 2008;3:127–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

4. The patient may take resources from others by needing higher levels of aftercare as a result of poor treatment services obtained abroad.

5. Robertson, JA. Ethics and policy in embryonic stem cell research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1999;9:109–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Robertson, JA. Causative vs. beneficial complicity in the embryonic stem cell debate. Connecticut Law Review 2004;36:1099–113Google ScholarPubMed.

6. Harris, J. The Value of Life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1985Google Scholar.