Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Minority Populations and Advance Directives: Insights from a Focus Group Methodology

  • Joshua M. Hauser (a1), Sharon F. Kleefield (a2), Troyen A. Brennan (a3) and Ruth L. Fischbach (a4)

Extract

Numerous studies have shown almost uniformly positive opinions among patients and physicians regarding the concept of advance directives (either a healthcare proxy or living will). Several of these studies have also shown that the actual use of advance directives is significantly lower than this enthusiasm would suggest, but they have not explained the apparent discordance. Nor have researchers explained why members of minority groups are much less likely to complete advance directives than are white patients. In this study, we used a focus group methodology to examine the ways in which diverse populations of patients view the medical, philosophical, and practical issues surrounding advance directives. We were motivated by the significantly lower prevalence of advance directives among African-American and Hispanic patients at one urban teaching hospital (18% for Caucasians, 4% for African-Americans, and 2% for Hispanics). Our premise was that African-American and Hispanic populations, who have had higher rates of morbidity and mortality across numerous disease categories, and historically have had limited access to care and opportunities to discuss health concerns, may be more suspicious about the right of autonomy that an advance directive is designed to ensure.

Copyright

References

Hide All

Notes

1. Emanuel, LL, Barry, MJ, Stoeckle, JD et al. , Advance directives for medical care—A case for greater use. NEJM 1991;324:889–95.

2. Reilly, BM, Magnussen, CR, Ross, J et al. , Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Archives of Internal Medicine 1994;154:22992308.

3. Joos, SK, Reuler, JB, Powell, JL et al. , Outpatients' attitudes and understanding regarding living wills. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1993;8:259–63.

4. Brunetti, LL, Carperos, SD, Westlund, RE. Physicians' attitudes towards living wills and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1991;6:323–9.

5. Johnson, SC, Pfeifer, MP, McNutt, R. The discussion about advance directives: Patient and physician opinions regarding when and how it should be conducted. Archives of Internal Medicine 1995;155:1025–30.

6. Layson, RT, Adelman, HM, Wallach, PM et al. , Discussions about the use of life-sustaining treatments: a literature review of physicians' and patients' attitudes and practices. Journal of Clinical Ethics 1994;5:195201.

7. Navarro, V. Race or class versus race and class: mortality differentials in the United States. The Lancet 1990;336:1238–40.

8. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Black-white disparities in health care. JAMA 1990;263:2344–46.

9. Ayanian, JZ. Race, class and the quality of medical care. JAMA 1994;271:1207–8.

10. Kahn, KL et al. , Health care for black and poor hospitalized Medicare patients. JAMA 1994:271:1169–74.

11. Sugarman, L, Weinberger, M, Swayer, G. Factors associated with veterans' decisions about living wills. Archives of Internal Medicine 1992;152:343–7.

12. Haas, JS, Weissman, JS, Cleary, PD et al. , Discussion of preferences for life-sustaining care by persons with AIDS: predictors of failure in patient-physician communication. Archives of Internal Medicine 1993;153:1241–48.

13. Teno, J, Lynn, J, Phillips, R et al. , Do advance directives save resources? Clinical Research 1993;41: 551A.

14. Garrett, JM, Harris, RP, Norburn, JK et al. , Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness: who wants what? Journal of General Internal Medicine 1993;8:361–8.

15. Caralis, PV, Davis, B, Wright, K et al. , The influence of ethnicity and race on attitudes toward advance directives, life-prolonging treatment and euthanasia. Journal of Clinical Ethics 1993;4:155–65.

16. Klessig, J. The effect of values and culture on life-support decisions. In: Cross-cultural medicine—A decade later [Special Issue]. Western Journal of Medicine 1992;157:316–22.

17. Davidson, MN, Devney, P. Attitudinal barriers to organ donation among Black Americans. Transplantation Proceedings 1991;23:2531–2.

18. Thomas, SB, Quinn, SC. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932–72: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk reduction programs in the Black community. American Journal of Public Health 1991;81:1498–505.

19. Guinan, ME. Black communities' belief in “AIDS as genocide”: a barrier to overcome for HIV prevention for Black Americans. Annals of Epidemiology 1993;3:193–5.

20. Gamble, A. Legacy of distrust: African-Americans and medical research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1993;9(Suppl 6):35–8.

21. Fischbach, RL. The Tuskegee legacy. Harvard Medical Alumini Bulletin 19921993;66(Winter):25–8.

22. Edgar, H. Twenty years after: The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Outside the community. Hastings Center Report 1992;22(6):32–5.

23. Emanuel, LL. Advance directives: what have we learned so far? Journal of Clinical Ethics 1993;4:816.

24. Malloy, TR, Wigton, RS, Meeske, J et al. , The influence of treatment descriptions on advance medical directive decisions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1992;40:1255–60.

25. Brunetti, , Carperos, , Westlund, 1991. See note 4.

26. Schneiderman, LJ, Kaplan, RM, Pearlman, RA et al. , Relationship of general advance directive instructions to specific life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with serious illness. Archives of Internal Medicine 1992;152:2114–22.

27. Wolf, SM, Boyle, P, Callahan, D et al. , Sources of concern about the Patient-Self Determination Act. NEJM 1991;325:1666–71.

28. Johnson, SC, Pfeifer, MP, McNutt, R. The discussion about advance directives: patient and physician opinions regarding when and how it should be conducted. Archives of Internal Medicine 1995;155:1025–30.

29. Emanuel, LL, Emanuel, EJ. Decisions at the end of life: guided by communities of patients. Hastings Center Report 1993;23(5):614.

30. Leape, LL, Freshour, MA, Yntema, D et al. , Small-group judgment methods for determining resource-based relative values. Medical Care 1992;30 (11 Supplement):N528–39.

31. Shmerling, A, Schattner, P, Piterman, L. Qualitative research in medical practice. Medical Journal of Australia 1993;158:619–22.

32. Elder, NC, Schneider, FD, Zweig, SC et al. , Community attitudes and knowledge about advance care directives. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 1992;5:565–72.

33. Gray-Vickrey, P. Gerontological research: use and application of focus groups. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 1993;19:2127.

34. Schattner, P, Shmerling, A, Murphy, B. Focus groups: a useful research method in general practice. Medical Journal of Australia 1993;158:622–5.

35. Morgan, DL. Doctor-caregiver relationships: An exploration using focus groups. In Crabtree, and Miller, , Eds., Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1992.

36. Strauss, AL. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

37. Silverman, HJ, Fry, ST, Armistead, N. Nurses' Perspectives on implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act. Journal of Clinical Ethics 1994;5:30–7.

38. Orona, CJ, Koenig, BA, Davis, AJ. Cultural aspects of nondisclosure. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1994;3:338–46.

39. Blackball, LJ, Murphy, ST, Frank, G et al. , Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA 1995;274:820–5.

40. Dula, A. African-American suspicion of the healthcare system is justified: What do we do about it? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1994;3:347–57.

41. Dula, A. The life and death of Miss Mildred, an elderly Black woman. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 1994;10:419–30.

42. Navarro, 1990. See note 7.

43. AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs 1990. See note 8.

44. Emanuel, , Emanuel, 1993. See note 29.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed