Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Gavaghan, Colin 2010. A whole new... you? ‘Personal identity’, emerging technologies and the law. Identity in the Information Society, Vol. 3, Issue. 3, p. 423.

  • Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Volume 6, Issue 3
  • July 1997, pp. 325-338

Reassessing the Reliability of Advance Directives

  • Thomas May (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 July 2009

A competent patient has the right to refuse treatment necessary to sustain life. However, for many end-of-life decisions, we lack direct access to the wishes of a competent patient. Some treatment decisions near the end of life involve patients with severely diminished mental capacity (for example, Alzheimer's patients), some involve patients who are unable to communicate (for example, some stroke victims), and some involve patients who are simply unable or unwilling to participate in decisionmaking due to the nature or severity of their illness.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J Radden . Planning for mental disorder: Buchannan and Brock on advance directives. Social Theory and Practice 1992;18(2).

EF McClennen . Rationality and Dynamic Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

R Dresser . Bound to treatment: the Ulysses contract. Hastings Center Report 1984;14(3):13–6.

M Winston Can a subject consent to a “Ulysses Contract”? Hastings Center Report 1982;12(4):26–8.

T May . The nurse under physician authority. Journal of Medical Ethics 1993;19(4):223–7.

L Emanuel Advance directives for medical care—a case for greater use. New England Journal of Medicine 1991;324(13):889–95.

J Drane . The many faces of competency. Hastings Center Report 1985;15(2):1721.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • ISSN: 0963-1801
  • EISSN: 1469-2147
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *