Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T20:26:15.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption and Content of Water in Eggs of Ctenicera destructor (Brown), Ctenicera aeripennis (Kirby) and Hypolithus bicolor Eschscholtz (Coleoptera: Elateridae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. F. Doane
Affiliation:
Canada Agriculture Research Station, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

Abstract

Eggs of Ctenicera destructor (Brown), Ctenicera aeripennis (Kirby) and bisexual and parthenogenetic strains of Hypolithus bicolor Eschscholtz must absorb water to complete embryonic development.

In eggs of C. destructor incubated at 24.4 ± 0.5 °C. in sifted soil containing 15% water (wet weight basis), water absorption started during the second day of development and ended within 24 hours. The mean wet weight increased from 26.6 ± 0.2 (standard deviation) μg. to 39.2 ± 0.6 μg. by the third day. During this period the water content increased from 42% to 64%. After the third day, the mean wet weight remained constant but a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the mean water content and a significant decrease (P < 0.01) in the mean dry weight occurred.

The progress of water absorption in eggs of C. aeripennis and the two strains of H. bicolor was similar to that in C. destructor. Differences from C. destructor were apparent, however, in the sizes of the eggs, in the initial and final amounts of dry matter and in the water contents.

Water absorption by eggs of C. destructor started after one day of incubation at 25 ± 0.5 °C., after 1 to 2 days at 20°, and after 4 days at 15°. The rate of absorption appeared to be slightly more rapid at higher temperatures within the range of 15–25 °C.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, K. L., and Rutschky, C. W.. 1961. Lipids in insect eggs: a review with new evidence from the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Hemiptera, Lygaeidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 54: 156164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edney, E. B. 1957. The water relations of terrestrial arthropods. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, K. M., Arnason, A. P. and Glen, R.. 1933. The wireworm problem in field crops of Western Canada. Ent. Branch Can. Dep. Agric. Saskatoon Leaf. 35, 21 pp.Google Scholar
Kosmachevskii, A. S. 1950. The influence of temperature and humidity on the rapidity of development of Elaterids. (In Russian.) Dokl. i Akad. Nauk. SSSR. (N.S.) 73: 11011103. (Rev. appl. Ent. 40: 250 (1952).)Google Scholar
Kosmachevskii, A. S. 1960. Biology of Agriotes litigiousus var. tauricus Heyd. and Agriotes sputator L. (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Ent. Rev. 38: 663672.Google Scholar
Strickland, E. H. 1927. Wireworms of Alberta (a preliminary report). Univ. Alta. Coll. Agr. Bull. 2, 18 pp.Google Scholar
Strickland, E. H. 1933. The biology of prairie inhabiting wireworms. World's Grain Exhib. and Conf. 2, 520529.Google Scholar
Yoshida, M. 1961. Ecological and physiological researches on the wireworm Melanotus caudex Lewis. Fac. Agr. Shizuoka Univ. Spec. Rept. 1, 127 pp.Google Scholar
Zacharuk, R. Y. 1958. Note on two forms of Hypolithus bicolor Esch. (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Canad. Ent. 90: 567568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar