Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T16:59:11.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ADULT SURVIVORSHIP, FECUNDITY, AND FACTORS AFFECTING LABORATORY OVIPOSITION OF PISSODES NEMORENSIS (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Mark S. Fontaine
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA 32611
John L. Foltz*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA 32611
*
1 Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Extract

The deodar weevil, Pissodes nemorensis Germar, is a vector and wounding agent associated with pitch canker fungus, Fusarium moniliforme Sheld. var. subglutinans Wr. & Reink., in the southeastern United States (Blakeslee et al. 1981). This univoltine weevil breeds in southern pines that have been stressed by factors such as fire, lightning, or mechanical injury (Baker 1972). The adults feed on phloem after chewing through the outer bark. Females deposit eggs in some of these feeding pits and then plug the hole with macerated phloem (Atkinson 1979). Larvae tunnel under the bark and feed on phloem as they develop.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfaro, R.I., and Borden, J.H.. 1982. Host selection by the white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi Peck: feeding bioassays using host and nonhost plants. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 6470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrewartha, H.G., and Birch, L.C.. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Atkinson, T.H. 1979. Bionomics of Pissodes nemorensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in north Florida. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville. 100 pp.Google Scholar
Baker, W.L. 1972. Eastern forest insects. U.S.D.A. For. Serv. Misc. Publ. 1175. 642 pp.Google Scholar
Belyea, R.M., and Sullivan, C.R.. 1956. The white pine weevil: A review of current knowledge. For. Chron. 32: 5767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakeslee, G.M., Foltz, J.L., and Oak, S.W.. 1981. The deodar weevil, a vector and wounding agent associated with pitch canker of slash pine. Phytopathology 71: 861 (abstract).Google Scholar
Bliss, M., and Kearby, W.H.. 1970. Notes on the life history of the pales weevil and northern pine weevil in central Pennsylvania. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 731734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, M.S., Foltz, J.L., and Nation, J.L.. 1983. Reproductive anatomy and seasonal development of the deodar weevil, Pissodes nemorensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in north Florida. Environ. Ent. 12: 687691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gara, R.I., Carlson, R.L., and Hrutfiord, B.F.. 1971. Influence of some physical and host factors on the behavior of the Sitka spruce weevil, Pissodes sitchensis, in southwestern Washington. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 467471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S.A. 1926. Biology and control of the white-pine weevil. Cornell Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 449.Google Scholar
ODell, T.M. 1972. The relationship between the fecundity of the white pine weevils, Pissodes strobi (Peck), and the relative water content of its host, Pinus strobus. Second North American Forest Biology Workshop, Oregon State Univ. 11 pp.Google Scholar
Phillips, T.W., and Lanier, G.N.. 1983. Biosystematics of Pissodes Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Feeding preference and breeding site specificity of P. strobi and P. approximatus. Can. Ent. 115: 16271636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobodkin, L.B. 1962. Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. 184 pp.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.W., and Franklin, R.T.. 1970. Biology of Hylobius pales (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Georgia Piedmont. Can. Ent. 102: 729735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar