Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-22T16:05:26.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attraction of Hylastes opacus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to nonanal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Peter de Groot*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5
Therese M. Poland
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 1407 S. Harrison Road, Room 220, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: Pdegroot@nrcan.gc.ca).

Extract

Hylastes opacus Erichson is a recently introduced bark beetle in North America (Bright and Skidmore 1997; Hoebeke 1994; Rabaglia and Cavey 1994; Wood 1992). It is widely distributed in the Palearctic region, where it usually breeds in stumps and roots of dead or dying pines (Pinus) and occasionally other conifers (Hoebeke 1994). Like many species of bark beetles, H. opacus uses host volatiles as cues to search for suitable host material for feeding and establishment of broods. Hoebeke (1994) reported the attraction of H. opacus to ethanol-baited logs of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) in New York, United States of America. In Sweden, Schroeder and Lindelöw (1989) observed H. opacus responding to (−)-α-pinene and to ethanol released separately, but a synergistic increase in response did not occur when these two compounds were released together. In later experiments, Lindelöw et al. (1993) found that traps baited with ethanol alone, ethanol + (−)-α-pinene, and spruce turpentine caught significantly more H. opacus than unbaited traps. In these experiments, (−)-α-pinene alone was not attractive, and when (−)-α-pinene was combined with spruce turpentine and ethanol, it reduced catches of H. opacus. In 2002, while investigating attractants for the pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (L.) (TM Poland, P de Groot, S Burke, D Wakarchuk, RA Haack, and RW Nott, unpublished data), we unexpectedly found significant numbers of H. opacus in one of our experiments. Here we report that H. opacus is strongly attracted to nonanal.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bright, D.E., Skidmore, R.E. 1997. A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera). Supplement 1 (1990–1994). Ottawa, Ontario: National Research Council Research PressGoogle Scholar
Czokajlo, D. 1998. Semiochemicals for the larger pine shoot beetle (Tomicus piniperda L.) and its clerid predators. PhD dissertation, State University of New York, SyracuseGoogle Scholar
Hoebeke, E.R. 1994. New records of immigrant bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in New York: attraction of conifer-feeding species to ethanol-baited trap logs. Entomological News 105: 267–76Google Scholar
Huber, D.P., Borden, J.H. 2001. Angiosperm bark volatiles disrupt response of Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae, to attractant-baited traps. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 217–33Google Scholar
Huber, D.P., Borden, J.H., Stastny, M. 2001. Response of the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to conophthorin and angiosperm bark volatiles in the avoidance of non-hosts. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 3: 225–32Google Scholar
Lindelöw, Å, Eidmann, H.H., Nordenhem, H. 1993. Response on the ground of bark beetle and weevil species colonizing conifer stumps and roots to terpenes and ethanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19: 1393–403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pureswaran, D.S., Gries, R., Borden, J.H., Pierce, H.D. Jr 2000. Dynamics of pheromone production and communication in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, and the pine engraver, Ips pini(Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Chemoecology 10: 153–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabaglia, R.J., Cavey, J.F. 1994. Note on the distribution of the immigrant bark beetle, Hylastes opacus, in North America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Entomological News 105: 277–9Google Scholar
Schroeder, L.M., Lindelöw, Å. 1989. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of αpinene and ethanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 807–17Google Scholar
Wood, S.L. 1992. Nomenclatural changes and new species in Platypodidae and Scolytidae (Coleoptera). Part II. Great Basin Naturalist 52: 7888Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall IncGoogle Scholar