Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T03:03:59.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BIOLOGY OF TELENOMUS CHLOROPUS (HYMENOPTERA: SCELIONIDAE) FROM EGGS OF NEZARA VIRIDULA (HEMIPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE) REARED ON RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE SOYBEAN GENOTYPES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D.B. Orr
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA 70803
D.J. Boethel
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA 70803
W. A. Jones
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Field Crop Insect Management Laboratory, PO Box 225, Stoneville, Mississippi, USA 38776

Abstract

The biology of Telenomus chloropus Thomson was studied on eggs of Nezara viridula (L.) which had been reared on the stink bug resistant soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill, genotype PI 171444 and the susceptible cultivar Davis. Time of development of T. chtoropus from egg to adult emergence was not significantly different in eggs oviposited by N. viridula reared on either Davis or PI 171444. However, successful emergence of T. chloropus from host eggs was significantly lower for parasitoids that developed in eggs from N. viridula reared on PI 171444. Longevity of adult T. chloropus was not significantly different between females that were allowed or denied oviposition regardless of the genotype fed the host. Total fecundity of T. chloropus reared from eggs of N. viridula fed PI 171444 was one-half that of parasitoids from the Davis treatment. Although ovipositional patterns over the lifetime of parasitoids from the 2 treatments were similar, the mean number of progeny produced per day was significantly greater in the Davis treatment. Also, the ovipositional period of parasitoids from the PI 171444 treatment was shorter than for parasitoids from the Davis treatment.

Résumé

On a étudié la biologie de Telenomus chloropus Thomson sur les oeufs de Nezara viridula (L.) élevé sur le soja (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) résistant aux punaises (génotype PI 171444) et sur le cultivar non-résistant Davis. Le temps de développement de T. chloropus de l'oeuf à l'imago n'était pas différent dans les oeufs de N. viridula élevés sur Davis ou PI 171444. Mais, les parasitoïdes qui développaient du traitement PI 171444 eurent bien moins de succès d'émergence. Le génotype de soja n'avait aucun effet sur la longueur de vie des adulte T. chloropus. La fécondité totale de T. chloropus du traitement PI 171444 était la moitié de celle des parasitoïdes du traitement Davis. Le nombre moyen des descendants des parasitoïdes était le plus grand dans le traitement Davis. De plus, la durée de la ponte des parasitoïdes était plus courte dans le traitement PI 171444.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, B.C., and Duffey, S.S.. 1979. Tomatine and parasitic wasps: potential incompatibility of plant anti-biosis with biological control. Science 205: 700702.Google Scholar
Casagrande, R.A., and Haynes, D.L.. 1976. The impact of pubescent wheat on the population dynamics of the cereal leaf beetle. Environ. Ent. 5: 153159.Google Scholar
Fehr, W.R., and Caviness, C.E.. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Iowa Coop. Ext. Serv. Spec. Rep. 80. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Gilman, D.R., McPherson, R.M., Newsom, L.D., Herzog, D.C., and Williams, C.. 1982. Resistance in soybeans to the southern green stink bug. Crop Sci. 22: 573576.Google Scholar
House, H.L., and Barlow, J.S.. 1961. Effects of different diets of a host, Agria affinis (Fall.) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), on the development of a parasitoid, Aphaereta pallipes (Say) (Hymenpotera: Braconidae). Can. Ent. 93: 10411044.Google Scholar
Jensen, R.L., and Newsom, L.D.. 1972. Effect of stink bug-damaged seeds on germination, emergence and yield. J. econ. Ent. 65: 261264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.G., Kishaba, A.N., and Bohn, G.W.. 1975. Response of several pest species to Cucumis melo L. lines resistant to Aphis gossypii Glover. Environ. Ent. 4: 653657.Google Scholar
Kester, K.M., Smith, C.M., and Gilman, D.F.. 1984. Mechanisms of resistance in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) genotype PI171444 to the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Environ. Ent. 13: 12081215.Google Scholar
Obrycki, J.J., Tauber, M.J., and Tingey, W.M.. 1983. Predator and parasitoid interaction with aphid-resistant potatoes to reduce aphid densities: a two year field study. J. econ. Ent. 76: 456462.Google Scholar
Painter, R.H. 1951. Insect resistance in crop plants. Univ. Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas. 520 pp.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., and Wheeler, A.G. Jr., 1973. Influence of alfalfa resistance on a pea aphid population and its associated parasites, predators and competitors. Environ. Ent. 2: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.E., and Shepard, M.. 1982. Biology of Australian and United States strains of Trissolcus basalis, a parasitoid of the green vegetable bug, Nezara viridula. Aust. J. Ecol. 7: 181186.Google Scholar
Salto, C.E., Eikenbary, R.D., and Starks, K.J.. 1983. Compatability of Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) biotypes “C” and “E” reared on susceptible and resistant oat varieties. Environ. Ent. 12: 603604.Google Scholar
Smith, D.A.S. 1978. Cardiac glycosides in Danaus chrysippus (L.) provide some protection against an insect parasitoid. Experientia 34: 844846.Google Scholar
Starks, K.J., Muniappan, R., and Eikenbary, R.D.. 1972. Interaction between plant resistance and parasitism against the greenbug on barley and sorghum. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 650655.Google Scholar
Thurston, R., and Fox, P.M.. 1972. Inhibition by nicotine of emergence of Apanteles congregatus from its host, the tobacco hornworm. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 547550.Google Scholar
Todd, J.M., and Herzog, D.C.. 1980. Sampling phytophagous Pentatomidae on soybean. pp. 438478in Kogan, M., and Herzog, D.C. (Eds.), Sampling methods in soybean entomology. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohdy, N.Z.M. 1976. On the effect of the food of Myzus persicae (Sulz.) on the Hymenopterous parasite Aphelinus asychis Walker. Oecologia 26: 185191.Google Scholar