Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:15:17.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CONTACT TOXICITY OF 34 INSECTICIDES TO SECOND-STAGE NYMPHS OF LEPTOGLOSSUS CORCULUS (HEMIPTERA: COREIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Gary L. DeBarr
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Athens, Georgia 30602
John C. Nord
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Athens, Georgia 30602

Abstract

Second-stage nymphs of the leaffooted pine seedbug, Leptoglossus corculus (Say), were highly susceptible to most of 34 topically applied insecticides, twenty-six chemicals ad Ld50 values of less than 5 μg/g of body weight. Nine insecticides — aldicarb, aminocarb, azinphosmethyl, carbofuran, dicrotophos, FMC 45498 ((−)-(Cyano) (3-phenoxyphenyl)-methyl (+)-cis-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylate), monocrotophos, propoxur, and SD 43775 (Cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl-4-chloro-alpha-(1-methylethyl)benzeneacetate) — had LD90 values of less than 1 μg/g of body weight. There was good agreement between the relative toxicities of insecticides applied topically to the leaffooted pine seedbug in these laboratory tests and the effectiveness of several insecticides previously tested in the field.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bullock, R. C. 1974. Toxicity of selected insecticides to the citron bug, Leptoglossus gonagra, a minor pest of Florida citrus. Proc. Fla St. Hortic. Soc. 87: 1719.Google Scholar
Busvine, J. R. 1971. A critical review of the techniques for testing insecticides. Commonw. Inst. Ent., London.Google Scholar
Daum, R. J. 1970. A revision of two computer programs for probit analysis. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 16: 1015.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G. L. 1967. Two new sucking insect pests of seed in southern pine seed orchards. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note SE-78. 3 pp.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G. L. In press. Southwide tests of carbofuran for seedbug control in pine seed orchards. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE-185.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G. L. and Ebel, B. H.. 1973. How seedbugs reduce the quantity and quality of pine seed yields. Twelfth South. For. Tree Improv. Conf. Proc. 1973: 97103.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G. L. 1974. Conelet abortion and seed damage of shortleaf and loblolly pines by a seedbug, Leptoglossus corculus. For. Sci. 20: 165170.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G. L. and Kormanik, P. P.. 1975. Anatomical basis for conelet abortion on Pinus echinata following feeding by Leptoglossus corculus (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Can. Ent. 107: 8186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBarr, G. L. et al. 1972. Phorate tests for slash pine cone insect control with observations on clonal variation in insect infestation. For. Sci. 18: 5664.Google Scholar
Ebel, B. H. 1977. Leptoglossus corculus (Say) — A study of its biology, life stages, and laboratory colonization. Ph.D. Diss., Dep. Ent., Univ. Ga., Athens. 101 pp.Google Scholar
Ebel, B. H. et al. 1975. Seed and cone insects of southern pines. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-8. 40 pp.Google Scholar
Merkel, E. P. and DeBarr, G. L.. 1971. Trunk implantations of dicrotophos for cone insect control in slash pine seed production stands. J. econ. Ent. 64: 12951298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merkel, E. P. et al. 1976. Mist blower application of Guthion® for cone insect control in slash pine seed orchards. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE-148. 8 pp.Google Scholar
Metcalf, R. L. 1958. Methods of topical application and injection, pp. 92113, in Shepard, H. H. (Ed.), Methods of testing chemicals on insects. Vol. I. Burgess, Minneapolis, Minn.Google Scholar