Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T23:01:27.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTROL OF APHID DENSITY BY A COMPLEX OF PREDATORS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

B. D. Frazer ,
N. Gilbert ,
V. Nealis  and
D. A. Raworth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of field experiments using large field cages were used to evaluate the role of aphidophagous predators on the population dynamics of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), on alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. The pea aphid numbers increased rapidly in the cages to as much as 5 times the density in the adjacent fields. The difference between densities in the cage and field decreased as the season progressed. No significant differences in fecundity of the aphids were found either in clip cages in the field and cages, or in the laboratory using field-collected aphids that were allowed to larviposit for 24 h. We used an earlier simulation model of the aphid to show that if fecundity alone were responsible it would have to be 3 times the maximum rate we have ever observed. The return of the aphid density to the field value when one cage was removed and the aggregation of predators show the importance of predator movements in limiting prey numbers.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 113 , Issue 11 , November 1981 , pp. 1035 - 1041
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charnov, E., Frazer, B. D., Gilbert, N., and Raworth, D.. 1976. Fishing for aphids: the exploitation of a natural population. J. appl. Ecol. 13: 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. A. and Wright, D. W.. 1955. Population studies of the pea aphid in East Anglia. Bull. ent. Res. 46: 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, L. and Landis, B. J.. 1973. Notes on the predaceous habits of the Gray field slug, Peroceras laeve. Environ. Ent. 2: 306–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, B. D. and Gilbert, N.. 1976. Coccinellids and aphids: A quantitative study of the impact of adult ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on field populations of pea aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 73: 33–56.Google Scholar
Grace, J. 1977. Plant Response to Wind. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. and van den Bosch, R.. 1968. Impact of pathogens, parasites, and predators on aphids. A. Rev. Ent. 13: 325–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuenschwander, P., Hagen, K. S., and Smith, R. F.. 1975. Predation of aphids in California's alfalfa fields. Hilgardia 43: 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D. and Wheeler, A. G.. 1973. Species and diversity of arthropods in the alfalfa community. Environ. Ent. 2: 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, J. T., Kinn, K. N., Doutt, R. L., and Catie, J. R.. 1976. Biology of the mite, Anystis agilis (Acari: Anystidae): A California vineyard predator. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 69: 905–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickerman, G. P. and Sunderland, K. D.. 1975. Arthropods in cereal crops: nocturnal activity, vertical distribution and aphid predation. J. appl. Ecol. 12: 755–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeagan, K. V. and Dondale, C. D.. 1974. The spider fauna of alfalfa fields in northern California. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 67: 681–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar