Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T07:52:53.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE EVOLUTION OF THE HEAD REGION IN LOWER ARTHROPODS AND ITS BEARING UPON THE ORIGIN AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE ARTHROPODAN GROUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. C. Crampton
G. C. Crampton
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Agricultural College, Amherst, Mass.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As is indicated by the numbering of the figures in the accompanying plates, the following discussion of the head capsule of lower Arthropods is a continuation of the discussion of the head capsule of higher Arthropods given in a previous paper (Canadian Entomologist, LX. 1928, p. 129). The figures were numbered consecutively throughout all of the plates which were originally intended for inclusion in a single paper, and the original numbering has been retained in the accompanying plates (despite the fact that limitation of space necessitated dividing the original discussion into two parts) because reference was made to certain of the accompanying figures in the previous paper, and it would create confusion to later change the numbers which had been referred to in a previous paper. On this account, the accompanying plates begin with “Fig. 55.” instead of “Fig. I.”

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 60 , Issue 12 , December 1928 , pp. 284 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE WORKS

Boerner, , 1914. Beitr. z. Morphologie der Arthropoden; Zoologica, Heft 42, Vol. 17. p.l.Google Scholar
Boerner, , 1921. Die Gliedmassen der Arthropoden. Lang's Handbuch d. Morphologie der wirebellosen Piere.Google Scholar
Calman, , 1909. Crustacea. Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, Part 7.Google Scholar
Clarke, & Ruedemann, , 1912. The Eurypterida of N.Y., N.Y. State Mus. Mem. 14.Google Scholar
Crampton, , 1912a. The Origin and Homologies of the Paragnaths of Insects and related Arthropods. Psyche. 28, p. 84.Google Scholar
Crampton, , 1912b. The Origin of the Mandibles of Insects and related Arthropods. Jour. N.Y., Ent. Soc., 29, p. 63.Google Scholar
Crampton, , 1922a. Comparison of the first Maxillae of Insects and Crustacea. Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington, 24, p. 65.Google Scholar
Crampton, , 1922b. The Derivation of the Head Capsule of Insects from Crustacean Prototypes. Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington, p. 153.Google Scholar
Crampton, , 1923 A Phylogenetic Comparison of the Maxillae throughout the Orders of Insects. Jour. N.Y. Ent. Soc., 31, p. 77.Google Scholar
Crampton, , 1928. The Evolution of Insects, Chilopods, Diplopods, Crustacea, etc., Indicated by the Head Capsule. Canadian Entomologist, 60. No. 6, p. 129.Google Scholar
Handlirscii, , 1908. Die Fossile Insekten.Google Scholar
Raymond, , 1920. The Appendages, Ancestry and Relationships of Trilobites. Mem. Conn. Acad. Arts & Sciences, Vol. 7, p. 5.Google Scholar
Versluys, & Demoll, , 1922. Das Limulus Problem. Ergeb. u Fortschr. d. Zoologie, Bd. 5, Heft 1/3, p. 67.Google Scholar
Walcott, , 1912. Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita and Merostomata. Smith's. Misc. Collections, Vol. 57, No. 6, p. 145.Google Scholar
Warburg, , 1925. The Trilobites of the Leptaena Limestone in Dalarme. Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, 17, p.l.Google Scholar