Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:05:32.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GENETICS OF GLOSSINA MORSITANS MORSITANS (DIPTERA: GLOSSINIDAE): I. ELECTROPHORETIC BANDING PATTERNS OF XANTHINE OXIDASE AND ALDEHYDE OXIDASE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

B.M. Rolseth
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3
R.H. Gooding
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3

Abstract

Polyacrylamide gel (6%) electrophoresis (at pH 8.2) of the thoraces of adult Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood revealed three xanthine oxidase (XO) phenotypes and six aldehyde oxidase (AO) phenotypes. Each enzyme was postulated to be under the control of a single locus, XO with two alleles and AO with three alleles. Gene frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for both loci in two laboratory populations. Breeding experiments provided direct evidence for single locus control of each enzyme. No significant differences in phenotype frequencies were observed between the colony maintained at the University of Alberta, Canada and the parent colony at the University of Bristol, England. A colony of highly inbred flies from the University of Bristol had only one phenotype of AO and of XO.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolland, H.R., van Buren, A., van der Geest, L.P.S., and Helle, W.. 1974. Marker mutation in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans. Entomologia exp. appl. 17: 522524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackenridge, C.J. and Bachelard, H.S.. 1969. The effects of some variables on protein separation by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Chromatog. 41: 242249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, G. 1974. Genetic control of insect pests. Academic Press, New York, London, ix + 158 pp.Google Scholar
Dixon, W.J. and Massey, F.J.. 1957. Introduction to statistical analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York. xiii + 488 pp.Google Scholar
Geest, L.P.S. van der and Kawooya, J.. 1975. Genetic variation in some enzyme systems in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans. Entomologia exp. appl. 18: 508514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, J.P. 1960. Variations in the venation of Glossina Weidemann (Diptera: Muscidae). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 35: 4957.Google Scholar
Glasgow, J.P. 1963. The distribution and abundance of tsetse. Macmillan, New York. 241 pp.Google Scholar
Gooding, R.H. and Hollebone, J.E.. 1976. Heritability of adult weight in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. (Diptera: Glossinidae). Experientia 32: 15071508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, R.H. and Rolseth, B.M.. 1976. Digestive processes of haemotophagous insects. XI. Partial purification and some properties of six proteolytic enzymes from the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidae). Can. J. Zool. 54: 19501959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itard, J. and Jordan, A.M.. 1977. Mass rearing using animals for feeding, pp. 125–140, in Laird, M., Tsetse: The future for biological methods in integrated control. IDRC - 077e, Ottawa. 220 pp.Google Scholar
Jordan, A.M., Trewern, M.A., Southern, D.I., Pell, P.E., and Davies, E.D.G.. 1977. Differences in laboratory performance between strains of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood from Rhodesia and Tanzania and associated chromosome diversity. Bull. ent. Res. 67: 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pal, R. and LaChance, L.E.. 1974. The operational feasibility of genetic methods for control of insects of medical and veterinary importance. A. Rev. Ent. 19: 269291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pal, R. and Whitten, M.J. (Eds.). 1974. The use of genetics in insect control. Elsevier/North-Holland. xiii + 241 pp.Google Scholar
Wright, J.W. and pal, R. (Eds.). 1967. Genetics of insect vectors of disease. Elsevier, Amsterdam, London, New York. xix + 794 pp.Google Scholar