Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T01:10:03.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The importance of antennal mechanosensilla of Sepedon fuscipennis (Diptera: Sciomyzidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2013

John G. Stoffolano Jr.*
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, Department of Plant, Soil and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States of America
Marian Rice
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts 01075, United States of America
William L. Murphy
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Institution, 7835 Tufton Street, Fishers, Indiana 46038, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: stoff@ent.umass.edu).

Abstract

The styli, often called the aristae, of the antennae of adult Sepedon fuscipennis Loew (Diptera: Sciomyzidae) are shown to possess mechanosensilla, the number and arrangement of which differ between the sexes. It is suggested that the mechanosensilla provide sensory input to the female regarding the touching, or appositioning, of her styli by the male with his forelegs during copulation. Among the Sciomyzidae, S.fuscipennis males are unique in appositioning the antennae of the female during mating. Large clusters of pollen found on the styli of both sexes suggest that mechanosensilla and chemosensilla also provide sensory information about potential sources of food such as nectar (i.e., carbohydrates).

Résumé

Nous démontrons que les styles, souvent appelés aristas, des antennes des Sepedon fuscipennis Loew (Diptera: Sciomyzidae) adultes possèdent des sensilles mécanoréceptrices, dont le nombre et la disposition varient selon le sexe. Nous croyons que ces sensilles mécanoréceptrices fournissent des signaux sensoriels à la femelle durant l'accouplement lorsque le mâle touche les styles de la femelle en y apposant ses pattes antérieures. Chez les Sciomyzidae, les mâles de Sepedon sont les seuls à pratiquer cette apposition des pattes sur les antennes de la femelle durant l'accouplement. La présence d'importants amas de pollen sur les styles des deux sexes laisse croire que les sensilles mécanoréceptrices et chémoréceptrices procurent aussi des renseignements sur les sources potentielles de nourriture, telles que le nectar et donc les hydrates de carbone.

Type
Systematics & Morphology
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, P.J. 2003. Electrophysiological responses to sucrose from a gustatory sensillum on the larval maxillary palp of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 49: 733738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appleton, C.C., Miller, R.M., Maharaj, R. 1994. Control of schistosomiasis host snails in South Africa – the case for biocontrol by predator augmentation using sciomyzid flies. Journal of Medical and Applied Malacology, 5: 107116.Google Scholar
Barker, G.M., Knutson, L., Vala, J.-C., Coupland, J.B., Barnes, J.K. 2004. Overview of the biology of marsh flies (Diptera: Sciomyzidae), with special reference to predators and parasitoids of terrestrial gastropods. In Natural enemies of terrestrial molluscs. Edited by G.M. Barker. CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom. pp. 159219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J.K. 1979. Biology of the New Zealand genus Neolimnia (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 6: 561576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, D.A. 1983. The biology and immature stages of some Sepedon snail-killing flies in Natal (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Annals of the Natal Museum, 25: 293317.Google Scholar
Berg, C.O. 1973. Biological control of snail-borne diseases: a review. Experimental Parasitology, 33: 318330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, C.O.Knutson, L.V. 1978. Biology and systematics of the Sciomyzidae. Annual Review of Entomology, 23: 239258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C.O.Valley, K. 1985a. Nuptial feeding in Sepedon spp. (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 87: 622633.Google Scholar
Berg, C.O.Valley, K. 1985b. Further evidence of nuptial feeding in Sepedon (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 87: 769.Google Scholar
Cuperus, P.L. 1985. Inventory of pores in antennal sensilla of Yponomeuta spp. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) and Adoxophyes orana F.v.R. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 14: 347359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaponov, S.P., Khitzova, L.N., Sergeev, A.S. 2006. Fine morphology of Sciomyzidae (Diptera) female head sensory system. In Abstracts from the 6th International Congress of Dipterology, 23–28 September, Fukuoka, Japan [online]. pp. 84–85. Available from http://www.nadsdiptera.org/ICD/AbstractsICD6.pdf [accessed 26 October 2012].Google Scholar
Green, T. 1977. A man's obsession reveals the riches of a hidden world. Smithsonian, 8: 8187.
Johnson, E.A.C., Bonser, R.H.C., Jeronimidis, G. 2009. Recent advances in biomimetic sensing technologies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 367: 15591569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judd, W.W. 1964. Insects associated with flowering marsh marigold Caltha palustris L., at London, Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist, 96: 14721476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutson, L., Orth, R.E., Fisher, T.W., Murphy, W.L. 1986. Catalog of Sciomyzidae (Diptera) of America north of Mexico. Entomography, 4: 153.Google Scholar
Knutson, L.Vala, J.-C. 2002. Morphodiversity and biodiversity in Sepedon Latreille and related genera: a lineage, a tribe, or a subfamily? (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). In 5th International Congress of Dipterology, 29 September–4 October, Brisbane, Australia. Abstracts, International Congress of Dipterology, Brisbane, Australia. p. 119.Google Scholar
Knutson, L.V.Vala, J.-C. 2011. Biology of snail-killing sciomyzid flies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Liscia, A., Angioy, A.M., Crnjar, R., Pietra, P., Stoffolano, J.G. Jr. 1982. Chemocettori sui labelli, tarsi ed antenne di Chrysops fuliginosus Wied.: uno studio elettrofisiologico preliminare. Bollettino della Soc. Italiana di Biol. Sperimentale, 58: 673677.Google Scholar
McDonnell, R.J. 2004. The biology and behaviour of selected marsh fly species (Diptera: Sciomyzidae), potential biological control agents of liver fluke disease in Ireland. Ph.D. thesis. National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.Google Scholar
McDonnell, R.J., Mulkeen, C.J., Gormally, M.J. 2005. Sexual dimorphism and the impact of temperature on the pupal and adult stages of Sepedon spinipes spinipes, a potential biological control agent of fascioliasis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 115: 291301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIver, S.B. 1985. Mechanoreception. In Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Vol. 6. Edited by G.A. Kerkut and L.I. Gilbert. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. pp. 71132.Google Scholar
Orth, R.E. 1986. Taxonomy of the Sepedon fuscipennis group (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 88: 6376.Google Scholar
Prasad, K.D., Knutson, L., Ghorpadé, K. 2010. Notes on the biology of India Sepedon species (Diptera-Sciomyzidae): larval development on snail eggs, labellar hooks of adult flies, and trophallaxis. Colemania, 22: 312.Google Scholar
Scheiner, R., Schnitt, S., Erber, J. 2005. The functions of antennal mechanoreceptors and antennal joints in tactile discrimination of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 191: 857864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoffolano, J.G. Jr., Acaron, A., Conway, M. 2008. “Bubbling” or droplet regurgitation in both sexes of adult Phormia regina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) fed various concentrations of sugar and protein solutions. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101: 964970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffolano, J.G. Jr.Haselton, A.T. 2013. The adult Dipteran crop: a unique and overlooked organ. Annual Review of Entomology, 58: 205–225.Google Scholar
Stuckenberg, B.R. 1999. Antennal evolution in the Brachycera (Diptera), with a reassessment of terminology relating to the flagellum. Studia Dipterologica, 6: 3348.Google Scholar
Tobin, E.Stoffolano, J.G. Jr. 1973. The courtship of Musca species found in North America (Diptera: Muscidae). I. The house fly, Musca domestica L. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 66: 12491257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar