Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T05:36:23.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mode of Feeding of the Larva of Ctenicera aeripennis destructor (Brown) (Coleoptera: Elateridae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. C. Eidt
Affiliation:
Canada Department of Agriculture Research Laboratory, Saskatoon, Saskatchewa

Extract

Though wireworms, the larvae of elaterid beetles, are among the most important agricultural pests, little is known about how they feed.

Langenbuch (1932) and Subklew (1934) made observations on the feeding behaviour of Agriotes lineatus (L.) and A. obscurus (L.). According to Langenbuch, Agriotes spp. cause a brush-like fraying of cereal stems, which results from the way in which the larvae squeeze the stems with their mandibles, ingest the fluids, and leave the fibres intact. Ctenicera aeripennis destructor (Brown), the most important wireworm species in Western Canada, causes similar injury to cereal crops. The stems are attacked underground and are shredded but not cut off

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnason, A. P. 1931. A morphological study of the immature stages of Cryptohypnus nocturnus Esch. and a study of some ecological factors concerning wireworms. M.Sc. thesis. University of Saskatchewan. 105 pp.Google Scholar
Burgess, E. 1883. The structure of the mouth in the larva of Dytiscus. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 21: 223228.Google Scholar
Dobrovsky, T. M. 1954. Laboratory observations on Conoderus vagus Cand. (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Florida Ent. 37: 123131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsey, C. K. 1943. The musculature of the labrum, labium, and pharyngeal region of adult and immature Coleoptera. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 103(7). 42 pp., 24 pls.Google Scholar
Eidt, D. C. 1954. A description of the larva of Agriotes mancus (Say), with a key separating the larvae of A. lineatus (L.), A. mancus, A. obscurus (L.) and A. sputator (L.) from Nova Scotia. Can. Ent. 86: 481494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidt, D. C. 1958. The anatomy and histology of the full-grown larva of Ctenicera aeripennis destructor (Brown) (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Can. J. Zool. 36: 317361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glen, R. 1950. Larvae of the elaterid beetles of the tribe Lepturoidini (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 111(11). 246 pp.Google Scholar
Hyslop, J. A., and Böving, A. G.. 1954. Larva of Tetrigus fleutiauxi Van Zwaluwenburg. Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. 9: 4961.Google Scholar
Korschelt, E. 19231924. Bearbeitung einheimischer Tiere, Erste Monographie: Der Gelbrand Dytiscus marginalis L. Bd. 1 (1923) und 2 (1924). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lanchester, H. P. 1939. The external anatomy of the Pacific Coast wireworm. United States Dept. Agr., Tech. Bull. 693.Google Scholar
Langenbuch, R. 1932. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Biologie von Agriotes lineatus L. und Agriotes obscurus L. Z. angew. Ent. 19: 278300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rungius, H. 1911. Der Darmkanal (der Imago und Larve) von Dytiscus marginalis. Z. wiss. Zool. 98: 179287.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. Principles of insect morphology. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York and London. 667 pp.Google Scholar
Subklew, W. 1934. Agriotes lineatus L. und Agriotes obscurus L. (Ein Beitrag zu ihrer Morphologie und Biologie). Z. angew. Ent. 21: 96122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swingle, H. S. 1925. Digestive enzymes of an insect. Ohio J. Sci. 25: 209218.Google Scholar
Vogel, R. 1915. Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Baues und der Lebenweise der Larva von Lampyris noctiluca. Z. wiss. Zool. 112: 291432, 3 pls.Google Scholar
Woodworth, C. E. 1938. The reactions of wireworms to arsenicals. J. Agr. Res. 57: 229238.Google Scholar