Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T00:58:50.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OBSERVATIONS ON HOST PLANT INDUCED BEHAVIOR OF SCALE INSECTS AND THEIR ENDOPARASITES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

S. E. Flanders
S. E. Flanders
Affiliation:
University of California Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Differences in the behavior of scale insects induced by their host plants has been observed, principally, in uniparental, bisexual, univoltine species. Behavior in endoparasites of such species also may be thus modified. The phenomena involved, reproductivity, sexuality, voltinism and, with the parasites, host-regulation, are related to the environmentally induced immunity of the host plant to its indigenous scale insects.This immunity, when not a regional phenomenon, is necessarily sporadic. When operative, it may he as complete as generic-immunity. Periodic host plant non-susceptibility is considered to he a physiological response to meteorological and edaphic conditions, a response usually rendering the plant temporarily unsuitable for coccid development. The interpolation of immune periods in the life of a coccid’s normal host plant necessarily disrupts the continuity of the host-regulative action of the coccid’s parasites. Host plant pheno-immunity was first clearly manifested in regions where Lecanium corni Bouché, L. tiliae (Linnaeus), and Saissetia oleae (Bernard) free of their regulative parasites, reproduced in great abundance. In regions to which these coccids are indigenous the limitation of their outbreaks to artificial monocultures attested to the obscure nature of host plant pheno-immunity. The cessation of host plant immunity to coccids, the subsequent heavy reinfestation, and then the parasitic elimination of the outbreak attested to the host-regulative power of parasitization.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 102 , Issue 8 , August 1970 , pp. 913 - 926
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Compere, H. 1931. A discussion of the parasites of Saissetia oleae (Bern.) collected in Eritrea. Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 5: 247–255.Google Scholar
Compere, H. 1935. Exploratory search for natural enemies of the red scale. Calif. Citrog. 20: 371–382.Google Scholar
Compere, H. 1940. Parasites of the black scale, Saissetia oleae, in Africa. Hi'gardia 13: 387–425.Google Scholar
Compere, H. 1961. The red scale and its natural enemies. Hilgardia 31: 173–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, W. 1938. Host-determined morphological variations in Lecanium corni. Hilgardia 2: 613–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essig, E.O. 19929. Insects of Western North America. Macmillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1934. The life histories of newly imported predators of the red scale. J. econ. Ent. 27: 723–724.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1936. Coccidophilus citricola Brèthes, a predator enemy of red and purple scales. J. econ. Ent. 29: 1023–1024.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1942 a. Propagation of black scale on potato sprouts. J. econ. Ent. 35: 687–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1942 b. Metaphycus helvolus, an encyrtid parasite of black scale. J. econ. Ent. 35: 690–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1942 c. Biological observations on the citricola scale and its parasites. J. econ. Ent. 35: 830–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1942 d. Abortive development in parasitic Hymenoptera induced by the food plant of the insect host. J. econ. Ent. 35: 834–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1944. Observations on Prospaltella perniciosi and its production. J. econ. Ent. 37: 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1945. The bisexuality of uniparental Hymenoptera, a function of the environment. Am. Nat. 79: 122–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1952. Biological observations on parasites of the black scale. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 45: 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1958. The role of the ant in the biological control of scale insects in California. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Ent., Vol. 4, pp. 579–584.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E., and Bartlett, B. R.. 1964. Observations on two species Metaphycus (Encyrtidae, Hymenoptera) parasitic on citricola scale. Mushi 38: 39–42.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E., and Gressitt, J. L.. 1958. The natural control of California red scale in China. Quart. B., Calif. Dep. Agric. 49: 23–33.Google Scholar
Glen, R. 1956. Entomology in Canada up to 1956. Can. Ent. 88: 290–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendenning, R. 1933. A successful parasite introduction to British Columbia. Can. Ent. 65(8): 169–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendenning, R. 1934. On the control of Eulecanium coryli (L.) in British Columbia by the parasite Blastothrix sericea (Dalm.). Proc. Fifth Pac. Sci. Congr. Can. (1933), Vol. 5, pp. 3543–3545.Google Scholar
Graham, K., and Prebble, M. L.. 1953. Lecanium scale (Eulecanim coryli (L.)) and its parasite B. sericea in Br. Columbia. Can. Ent. 85: 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, T. 1927. Lecanium coryli. Spec. Publ. Calif. Dep. Agric. No. 73.Google Scholar
Maple, J. D. 1947. The eggs and first instar larvae of Encyrtidae and their morphological adaptation for respiration. Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 8: 25–122.Google Scholar
Marchal, P. 1908. Le Lecanium du Robinia. C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 65: 2–5.Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1963. A catalogue of the Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Can. Ent. Suppl. 30.Google Scholar
Peterson, L. O. T. 1960. Lecanium coryli L. (Homoptera: Coccoidea) in Saskatchewan. Can. Ent. 92: 851–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, L. O. T. 1962. Insect enemies of Lecanium coryli L. (Homoptera: Coccoidea) in Saskatchewan. Can. Ent. 94: 739–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priesner, H. 1938. A brief note on the relation between the physiological condition of plants and insect attack. Bull. Soc. Fouad 1er Ent. 22: 279–283.Google Scholar
Quayle, H. J. 1938. Insects of citrus and other subtropical fruits. Comstock, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Quayle, H. J., and Rust, E. W.. 1911. The black scale. Calif. Exp. Stn (B) 223: 150–200.Google Scholar
Sanders, J. G. 1909. The identity and synonymy of some of our soft scales. J. econ. Ent. 2: 428–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. S. 1929. The utilization of entomophagous insects in the control of citrus pests. Trans. 4th Int. Congr. Ent., Vol. 2, pp. 191–198.Google Scholar
Smith, H. S. 1942. A race of Comperiella bifasciata successfully parasitizes California red scale. J. econ. Ent. 35: 809–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. S., and Compere, H.. 1928. A preliminary report on the insect parasites of the black scale, Saissetia oleae (Bernard). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 4: 231–234.Google Scholar
Summerville, W. A. T. 1934. Queensland citrus scale insects and their control. B. 10. Queensland Dep. Agric. and Stock.Google Scholar
Swaine, A. F., and Duggan, P. E.. 1928. Significance of mid-season unit counts on resistant black scale. J. econ. Ent. 21: 532–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Thiem, H. 1932. Pleiosozontie als Arterhaltungsprinzip. Jenaische Z. Nature 67: 488–492.Google Scholar
*Thiem, H. 1933. Beitrag zur parthenogenese und Phänologie der Geschlechter von Eulecanium corni Bouché (Coccidae). Z. Morph. Oekol. Tiere 27: 294–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Thiem, H. 1938. Ueber Bedingungen der Massenvermehrung von Insekten. Arb. physiol. anzew Ent. Berl. 5: 229–255.Google Scholar
*Voukassovitch, H. 1930. Sur certaines variations dans le comportement de la cochenille Lecanium corni L. C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 104: 1068–1070.Google Scholar
*Voukassovitch, H. 1931. Sur la mortalité de la cochenille, Lecanium corni L. C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 106: 691–694.Google Scholar
*Voukassovitch, H. 1933. Sur une invasion de la cochenille, Lecanium corni, dans les prunelaies Yougoslaves. Congr. Int. Ent. Paris (1932), Vol. 5, pp. 679–691.Google Scholar
*Welsch, J. 1937. Die Massenverbreitung der Pflaumenschildlaus (Eulecanium corni [Bouché] March.) and Ursachen. Landw. Jbr 84: 431–492.Google Scholar