Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T10:14:46.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OBSERVATIONS ON THE IMMATURE STAGES OF GIMNOMERA CEREA AND G. INCISURATA (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE, SCATOPHAGINAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

S. E. Neff
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia

Abstract

G. cerea larvae feed upon the ovules and capsule of Pedicularis canadensis. Distribution of the fly coincides closely with its plant host. Adult flies are active in spring during the plant’s flowering period. Both sexes of flies are predaceous on small insects. Details of mating and oviposition behavior are elaborated. After feeding, larvae form puparia in the soil around roots of the host and undergo protracted diapause. All activities of the single generation per year are closely attuned to host plant’s cycle. Distribution of G. incisurata appears to closely follow that of its hosts. Larvae feed upon the flower parts of three species of Penstemon (hirsutus, digitalis, and calycosus). Duration of adult and larval activity periods along with behavior closely parallels G. cerea. In view of known host plant preferences in the Scatophaginae, it is suggested the way in which adaptation of Gimnomera to members of the Scrophulariaceae has been established is via the parasitic or hemiparasitic members of this plant family.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borg, A. 1959. Investigations on the biology and control of timothy grass flies, Amaurosoma armillatum Zett. and A. flavipes Fall. (Dipt. Cordyluridae). Swedish State Plant Protect. Inst. Contrib. 11:75301372.Google Scholar
Ciampolini, M. 1957. Observations on Norellia spinipes Mg. Redia 42(2): 259272.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D. W. 1908. New genera and species of Diptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 9: 144148.Google Scholar
Eberle, G. 1943. Die Mummelfliege (Hydromyza livens Fallen). Natur Volk 73: 293306.Google Scholar
Frohne, W. C. 1938. Biology of certain subaquatic flies reared from emergent water plants. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. 24: 139147.Google Scholar
Frost, S. W. 1932. Cordylura tricincta Loew, a leaf-miner on Smilacina racemosa (L.) Desf. Ent. News 43: 7577.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. 1959. The families of flowering plants. Vol. I. Dicotyledons. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Malcolm, W. M. 1964. Host damage by Castilleja coccinea (L.) Spreng., a root-parasitic flowering plant. Bull. Torrey bot. Club 91: 324326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, W. 1966. Root parasitism of Castilleja coccinea. Ecology 47: 179186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1920. Descriptions of new genera and species of Scataphagidae (Diptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 22: 3438.Google Scholar
Maybrook, A. C. 1917. On the haustoria of Pedicularis vulgaris Tournef. Ann. Bot. 31: 499512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piehl, M. A. 1963. Mode of attachment, haustorium structure, and hosts of Pedicularis canadensis. Ann. J. Bot. 50: 978985.Google Scholar
Ryden, N. 1933. Gymnomera hirti Hend., ein neuer Bluten Minierer. Ent. Tidskr. 54: 49.Google Scholar
Seguy, E., and Pauchet, H.. 1929. Etude sur le Chylizosoma paridis. Bull. Soc. linn. N. Fr. 414: 4764.Google Scholar
Stone, A., et al. 1965. A catalog of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. US. Dep. Agric., Agric. Handbk 276.Google Scholar
Volkart, A. 1899. Untersuchungen uber den Parasitismus der Pedicularisarten. Dissertation, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Welch, P. S. 1914. Observations on the life history and habits of Hydromyza confluens Loew (Diptera). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 8: 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, P. S. 1917. Further studies on Hydromyza confluens Loew (Diptera). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 10: 3546.Google Scholar