Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T00:47:41.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PATTERNS OF FEEDING INJURY TO POTATO BY THE POTATO FLEA BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) IN MANITOBA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

S.F. Pernal
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
D.G. Senanayake
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
N.J. Holliday*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
*
2 Author to whom reprint requests should be sent.

Abstract

The amount and distribution of foliar feeding injury by adult potato flea beetles, Epitrix cucumeris (Harris), were examined on individually caged potato plants grown in field plots in Manitoba. Plants were either maintained as uninfested controls, or were exposed throughout the growing season to different insect densities that mimicked the natural seasonal pattern of infestation. In 1984, a trial was conducted using cv. ‘Norland’ exposed to four different densities of potato flea beetles. In 1989 and 1990, cv. ‘Russet Burbank’ was exposed to potato flea beetles, and in some treatments, plants were exposed to early summer infestations of Colorado potato beetles, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). In each trial, during the late summer period of high potato flea beetle density, the amount and distribution of flea beetle feeding injury were assessed at weekly intervals. Counts of feeding punctures in single leaflets were made from leaves in the upper, middle, and lower third of each caged plant, and these data were subjected to repeated measures analysis of variance. In each of the 3 years, increasing the number of flea beetles increased the mean number of feeding punctures per leaflet in an approximately linear fashion; however, the number of punctures per beetle varied between cultivars and years. In 1984 and 1990, the number of feeding punctures per leaflet was least in the upper third of the plants, and greater in the lower, or middle and lower, third of plants. However, in 1989, the vertical distribution of feeding punctures was relatively even. Previous feeding by Colorado potato beetles increased the mean number of flea beetle feeding punctures per leaflet and changed the vertical distribution of feeding punctures. Rainfall and temperature were correlated with patterns of flea beetle injury; injury was concentrated on lower leaflets during weeks of greater rainfall, and upper leaflets were injured most during weeks with higher average temperatures. It is concluded that flea beetles exhibit preferences for feeding in specific portions of potato plants, and that these preferences change in response to previous defoliation and are influenced by meteorological conditions. Consequently, counting feeding punctures would not be a reliable method of assessing whether control measures for potato flea beetles are justified.

Résumé

Le montant et la distribution de dommage au feuillage causé par les piqûres d’alimentation de l’altise de la pomme de terre, Epitrix cucumeris (Harris), furent examinés sur des plants de pommes de terre individuels en cages plantés dans des lots de terrain au Manitoba. Les plants furent maintenus soit comme contrôles non infestés, ou furent exposés, pendant la saison de croissance à différentes densités d’insectes qui imitaient le patron saisonnier d’infestations naturelles. En 1984, un essai fut mené en utilisant cv. ‘Norland’ exposé à quatre densités différentes de l’altise de la pomme de terre. En 1989 et 1990, cv. ‘Russet Burbank’ fut exposé aux altises de la pomme de terre, et dans certains traitements, au début de l’été, les plants furent exposés à des infestations de doryphores de la pomme de terre, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). A chaque essai, vers la fin de l’été, au cours de la période de haute densité de l’altise de la pomme de terre, la quantité et la distribution de blessures par nutrition de l’altise furent évaluées une fois la semaine. Des comptes furent fait des piqûres d’alimentation sur le tiers des feuilles du haut, du centre et du bas de chaque plante en cage, et ces données furent sujettes à des mesures répétées d’analyse de variance. Dans chacune des 3 années, l’augmentation du nombre d’altises de la pomme de terre augmentait le nombre moyen de piqûres d’alimentation par feuille de façon linéaire approximative, cependant, le nombre de piqûres par coléoptère variait entre les cultures et les années. En 1984 et 1990, le nombre de piqûres d’alimentation par feuille fut moindre dans le tiers haut de plants, et plus grand dans le tiers bas, ou le tiers centre et bas des plants. Cependant, en 1989, la distribution verticale des piqûres d’alimentation fut relativement égale. L’alimentation précédente par le doryphore de la pomme de terre augmenta la moyenne de piqûres par feuille et changea la distribution verticale des piqûres d’alimentation. La chute de pluie et la température furent mises en corrélation avec les modèles de dommage de l’altise de la pomme de terre; le dommage fut concentré sur les feuilles inférieures pendant les semaines de chutes de pluie plus élevées et les feuilles supérieures furent plus endommagées pendant les semaines de températures plus élevées que la normale. La conclusion est que l’altise de la pomme de terre préfère s’alimenter de parties spécifiques des plants de pommes de terre, et que ces préférences changent dépendant des défoliations précédentes et sont influencées par les conditions météorologiques. En conséquence, compter les piqûres d’alimentation ne serait pas une méthode fiable pour évaluer si les mesures de contrôle pour l’altise de la pomme de terre sont justifiées.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, L.D., and Walker, H.G.. 1936. Control of the potato beetle, Epitrix cucumeris Harris. Virginia Truck Experimental Station Bulletin 92: 13611378.Google Scholar
Cole, T.V. 1951. Potato Insects and their Control in Manitoba. M.Sc. thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.226 pp.Google Scholar
Coleman, S.E., Hampson, M.C., Huston, F., and Haliburton, T. (Eds.). 1982. Atlantic Canada Potato Guide. Advisory Committee on Potatoes, Agdex 257/13, Publication 700.Google Scholar
Cannon, F.M. 1949. The Potato Flea Beetle. Canadian Department of Agriculture Processed Publication 49: 4 pp.Google Scholar
Environment Canada. 1984. Annual Meteorological Summary, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 1984. Atmospheric Environmental Service, Environment Canada.Google Scholar
Environment Canada. 1989. Annual Meteorological Summary, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 1989. Atmospheric Environmental Service, Environment Canada.Google Scholar
Environment Canada. 1990. Monthly Record. Part 1. Western Canada. Atmospheric Environment Service, Environment Canada.Google Scholar
Kring, J.B. 1958. Feeding behavior and DDT resistance of Epitrix cucumeris (Harris). Journal of Economic Entomology 51: 823828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lactin, D.J. 1992. Thermal Biology of the Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)), with Application to Pest Management Decision Making. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.337 pp.Google Scholar
Ladd, T.L. Jr., 1963. The Effects of the Feeding of the Potato Leafhopper, Empoasca fabae (Harris), and the Potato Flea Beetle, Epitrix cucumeris (Harris), on Photosynthesis, Respiration, and Transpiration in the Potato Plant. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. 165 pp.Google Scholar
Milliken, G.A., and Johnson, D.E.. 1984. Analysis of Messy Data. Volume 1: Designed Experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY. 473 pp.Google Scholar
Ring, D.R., Benedict, J.H., Landivar, J.A., and Eddleman, B.R.. 1993. Economic injury levels and development and application of response surfaces relating insect injury, normalized yield, and plant physiological age. Environmental Entomology 22: 273282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senanayake, D.G. 1987. Seasonal Abundance and Economic Injury Levels for Defoliators of Potato in Manitoba. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.166 pp.Google Scholar
Senanayake, D.G., and Holliday, N.J.. 1988. Comparison of visual, sweep-net, and whole plant bag sampling methods for estimating insect populations on potato. Journal of Economic Entomology 81: 11131119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senanayake, D.G., and Holliday, N.J.. 1989. Seasonal abundance of foliage-dwelling insect pests in commercial fields and insecticide-free plots of potato in Manitoba. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 253265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senanayake, D.G., Pernal, S.F., and Holliday, N.J.. 1993. Yield responses of potatoes to defoliation by the potato flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Manitoba. Journal of Economic Entomology 86: 15271533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L.S. 1984. The effect of potato flea beetle damage on yields of six potato varieties. p. 68in Agriculture Canada Research Summary 1984, Research Station Charlottetown, P.E.I.Google Scholar
Thompson, L.S. 1985. The effect of potato flea beetle damage on potato yields. p. 71in Agriculture Canada Research Summary 1985, Research Station Charlottetown, P.E.I.Google Scholar
Thompson, L.S. 1988. The control of potato flea beetles, leafhoppers, wireworms and white grubs. pp. 99–111 in Boiteau, G., Singh, R.P., and Pany, R.H. (Eds.), Potato Pest Management in Canada. Proceedings of a Symposium on Improving Potato Pest Protection, January 27–29, 1987, Fredericton, N.B. Fredericton Research Station, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada and New Brunswick Agriculture, Fredericton, N.B.384 pp.Google Scholar
Tomlin, E.S., and Sears, M.K.. 1992 a. Effects of Colorado potato beetle and potato leafhopper on amino acid profile of potato foliage. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18: 481488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomlin, E.S., and Sears, M.K.. 1992 b. Indirect competition between the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and the potato leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on potato: Laboratory study. Environmental Entomology 21: 787792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, J., and Biemond, H.. 1992. Effects of nitrogen on the development and growth of the potato plant. 1. Leaf appearance, expansion growth, life spans of leaves and stem branching. Annals of Botany 70: 2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, IL. 677 pp.Google Scholar