Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T05:28:03.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of Ellescus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in North America: new species and synonyms revealed through integrative taxonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2023

Jake H. Lewis Open the ORCID record for Jake H. Lewis [Opens in a new window]  and
Robert S. Anderson
Jake H. Lewis*
Affiliation:
Environmental Science and Informatics Section, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Kunigami-gun, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan Department of Natural History, New Brunswick Museum, 277 Douglas Avenue, Saint John, New Brunswick, E2K 1E5, Canada
Robert S. Anderson
Affiliation:
Beaty Centre for Species Discovery, Canadian Museum of Nature, 1740 Chemin Pink, Gatineau, Quebec, J9J 3N7, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jake-lewis@oist.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A combination of morphological and molecular techniques were used to revise the genus Ellescus Dejean, 1821 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Ellescini) in North America. Four valid species of Ellescus are documented from the Nearctic Region. These are the widespread, hypervariable E. ephippiatus (Say, 1831), the Holarctic E. bipunctatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (of which E. borealis (Carr, 1920) new synonym is found to be a new junior synonym), the west coast endemic E. californicus (Casey, 1885) (resurrected from synonymy with E. ephippiatus (Say, 1831)), and the temperately distributed E. michaeli new species. A neotype is designated for E. bipunctatus. The European species, E. scanicus (Paykull, 1792), is determined to have been erroneously reported from North America. An illustrated identification key, distributional data, and DNA sequences (CO1, ITS2) are provided to facilitate identification of the Ellescus species in North America. Notably, CO1 failed to delineate E. ephippiatus and E. michaeli, but the faster-evolving ITS2 reliably separated these taxa, further supporting the use of multiple markers in taxonomic studies and the utility of ITS2 in weevil species delineation.

Type
Research Paper
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 155 , 2023 , e15
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Entomological Society of Canada

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Taxonomic paper: ZooBank registration #: https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1245F6E6-64FD-40AD-9268-581A251D813D

Subject Editor: Derek Sikes

References

Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A., Barrios, H., Borovec, R., Bouchard, P., Caldara, R., Colonnelli, E., et al. 2017. Cooperative catalogue of Palearctic Coleoptera Curculionoidea. Monografías electrónicas SEA 8. Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa S.E.A, Zaragoza, Spain.Google Scholar
Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A. and Lyal, C.H.C. 1999. A world catalogue of families and genera of Curculionoidea (Insecta: Coleoptera) (excepting Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Entomopraxis, S.C.P., Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215: 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R.S. 2002. Family 131, Curculionidae. In American beetles. Volume 2: Polyphaga: Scarabaeoidea through Curculionoidea. Edited by Arnett, R.H., Thomas, M.C., Skelley, P.E., and Frank, J.H.. CRC Press, Florida, United States of America. Pp. 722–815.Google Scholar
Andreev, D., Breilid, H., Kirkendall, L., Brun, L.O., and French-Constant, R.H. 1998. Lack of nucleotide variability in a beetle pest with extreme inbreeding. Insect Molecular Biology, 7: 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2583.1998.72064.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astrin, J.J., Stuben, P.E., Misof, B., Wagele, J.W., Gimnich, F., Raupach, M.J., and Ahrens, D. 2012. Exploring diversity in cryptorhynchine weevils (Coleoptera) using distance-, character- and tree-based species delineation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 63: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.11.018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, E.P. 1880. Supplement to the checklist of the Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. S.E. Cassino, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. and Leng, C.W. 1916. Rhynchophora or weevils of northeastern America. The Nature Publishing Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Y., Bouchard, P., Davies, A.E., and Sikes, D.S. 2013. Checklist of beetles (Coleoptera) of Canada and Alaska. Pensoft Series Faunistica No. 109. Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldara, R., Franz, N.M., and Oberprieler, R.G. 2014. 3.7.10 Curculioninae Latreille, 1802. Handbook of Zoology. Coleoptera, beetles (Phytophaga: Chrysomeloidea, Curculionoidea): morphology and systematics. Edited by Leschen, R.A.B. and Beutel, B.G.. De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. Pp. 589–628.Google Scholar
Ciegler, J.C. 2010. Weevils of South Carolina (Coleoptera: Nemonychidae, Attelabidae, Brentidae, Ithyceridae, and Curculionidae). Biota of South Carolina. Volume 6. Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Edgar, R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32: 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elias, M., Hill, R.I., Willmott, K.R., Dasmahapatra, K.K., Brower, A.V.Z., Mallet, J., and Jiggins, C.D. 2006. Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274: 2881–2889. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., and Vrijenhoek, R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3: 294–299.Google ScholarPubMed
Fossen, E.I.F., Ekrem, T., Nilsson, A., and Bergsten, J. 2016. Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). Zookeys, 564: 71–120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, N.M. and O’Brien, C.W. 2001. Revision and phylogeny of Perelleschus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) with notes on its association with Carludovica (Cyclanthaceae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 127: 255–287.Google Scholar
Gallego, D. and Galian, J. 2001. The internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) of the rDNA differentiates the bark beetle forest pests Tomicus destruens and T. piniperda . Insect Molecular Biology, 10: 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1075.2001.00279.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, J. 1889. Catalogue of the Coleoptera common to North America, northern Asia and Europe, with distribution and bibliography. Paul C. Stockhausen Entomological Printer, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, K. and Park, S. 2015. Additional contribution to weevil fauna of Korea (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Entomological Research Bulletin, 31: 180–185.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. 2013. Plant and animal endemism in California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1971. The beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part 5: Rhipiceroidea, Sternoxi, Phytophaga, Rhynchophora, and Lamellicornia. University of Washington Publications in Biology, Volume 16. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.Google Scholar
Hight, S.D. 1988. Available feeding niches in populations of Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in northeastern United States. In Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Rome, Italy. Edited by E.D. Delfosse. CAB Direct, Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Pp. 269–278.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A. 1954. Faune de France, No. 59: Coléoptères Curculionides (Deuxième Partie). Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Hubbard, H.G., Schwarz, E.A., and LeConte, J.L. 1878. The Coleoptera of Michigan. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 17: 593–669.Google Scholar
Ivanova, N.V., deWaard, J., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2006. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6: 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1876. The Rhynchophora of America, north of Mexico. In Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Volume 15. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America. 455 pp.Google Scholar
Lewis, J.H. and Anderson, R.S. 2022. A revision of the North American genus Proctorus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Ellescini) with descriptions of two new species. ZooKeys, 1131: 135–153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1131.90392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, E.L. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agriculture Handbook No. 541. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., United States of America.Google Scholar
Mattson, W.J., Niemela, P., Millers, I., and Inguanzo, Y. 1994. Immigrant phytophagous insects on woody plants in the United States and Canada: an annotated list. General Technical Report NC-169. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navajas, M., Legnel, J., Gutierrez, J., and Boursot, P. 1998. Species-wide homogeneity of nuclear ribosomal ITS2 sequences in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae contrasts with extensive mitochondrial COI polymorphism. Heredity, 80: 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00349.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, C.W. 1970. A taxonomic revision of the weevil genus Dorytomus in North America – (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
O’Brien, C.W. and Wibmer, G.J. 1982. Annotated checklist of the weevils (Curculionidae sensu lato) of North America, Central America, and the West Indies (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 34.Google Scholar
Paykull, G. 1792. Monographia Curculionum Sveciae [A monograph of the weevils of Sweden]. Johan Edman, Upsala, Sweden. Available from https://archive.org/details/monographiacurc00payk [accessed 10 December 2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, R.W. and Gentili, P. 1996. Nomina insecta nearctica: a check list of the insects of North America [Names of Nearctic insects]. Volume 1, Coleoptera, Strepsiptera. Entomological Information Services, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.Google Scholar
Prena, J. 2018. An annotated inventory of the weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) described by Thomas Say. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 161: 1–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambaut, A. 2009. FigTree. Version 1.4.4. Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom. Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ [accessed 4 October 2022].Google Scholar
Ruchin, A.B., Egorov, L.V., and Khapugin, A.A. 2021. Usage of fermental traps for the study of the species diversity of Coleoptera. Insects, 12: 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, D., Ribeiro, G.C., Cabral, A.D., and Speranca, M.A. 2018. A non-destructive enzymatic method to extract DNA from arthropod specimens: implications for morphological and molecular studies. PLOS One, 13: e0192200. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherf, H. 1964. Die Entwicklundsstadien der mitteleuropaischen Curculioniden (Morphologie, Bionomie, Okologie). [The stages of development of the Central European curculionids (morphology, bionomy, ecology)] Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 506: 1–335.Google Scholar
Schoenherr, C.J. 1838. Genera et species curculionidum, cum synonymia hujus familiae. Species novae aut hactenus minus cognitae, descriptionibus. Dom. Leonardo Gyllenhal, C. H. Boheman, O.J Fahraeus, et entomologis aliis. [Genera and species of weevils, with synonyms of this family. New or hitherto less known species, with descriptions. Dom. Leonardo Gyllenhal, C. H. Boheman, O.J Fahraeus, and other entomologists.] Volume 4. Roret, Paris, France. Pp. 601–1121.Google Scholar
Skevington, J.H. 2005. Revision of Nearctic Nephrocerus Zetterstedt (Diptera: Pipunculidae). Zootaxa, 977: 1–36. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.977.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slosson, A.T. 1897. Additional list of insects taken in alpine region of Mt. Washington. Entomological News, 8: 237–240.Google Scholar
Su, Z., Huang, D., Omar, Y., Ren, L., Alonso-Zarazaga, M., Majer, J., and Zhang, R. 2012. What’s under a plastic strip? Hidden urban biodiversity in the Beijing metropolitan area, China. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 66: 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, R.P., Anderson, R.S., Webster, V.L., Alderson, C.A., Hughes, C.C., and Sweeney, J.D. 2016. New Curculionoidea records from New Brunswick, Canada, with an addition to the fauna of Nova Scotia. Zookeys, 573: 367–386. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.573.7444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, T.L., Dawson, R.D., Magalon, H., and Baudry, E. 2007. DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274: 1619. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0062.Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Lewis and Anderson supplementary material

Table S1
Download Lewis and Anderson supplementary material(File)
File 13.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Lewis and Anderson supplementary material

Table S2

Download Lewis and Anderson supplementary material(File)
File 15.6 KB