Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T02:33:49.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEASONAL PHENOLOGY OF THE WALNUT HUSK FLY, RHAGOLETIS COMPLETA CRESSON (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Abdulmajid Kasana
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA 97331-2907
M.T. AliNiazee
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA 97331-2907

Abstract

The seasonal phenology of the walnut husk fly (WHF), Rhagoletis completa Cresson, was studied in the Willamette Valley of Oregon during a 4-year period (1990–1993). Adult emergence observed in ground emergence cages varied greatly among years. Initial emergence ranged from 29 June to 17 July, and last emergence occurred as early as 17 August or as late as 11 September. The period of adult emergence was constant from year to year (mean 55, range 50–60 days) with the peak between the 3rd week of July and the 1st week of August. The period between first observed appearance of females in ground-level emergence cages and the first oviposition was consistent among the study years, ranging from 20 to 23 days. Peak oviposition occurred in the 2nd and 3rd weeks of August. Mean egg hatch and larval survival were 98 and 80%, respectively. Infestations reached over 95% in unsprayed trees by early to mid September. Mature larvae first exited from husks beginning the 4th week of August and continued through mid October. Larvae penetrated the soil and pupated at a depth of 2.5–7.6 cm with most within the top 2.5 cm of soil.

Résumé

La phénologie saisonnière a été étudiée chez la Mouche des brous du noyer, Rhagoletis completa Cresson, au cours d’une période de 4 ans (1990–1993), dans la vallée de la Willamette en Oregon. L’émergence des adultes dans des cages au sol a varié considérablement d’une année à l’autre. La première émergence a eu lieu le 29 juin une année et le 17 juillet une autre année et l’émergence s’est terminée le 17 août une année, mais s’est prolongée jusqu’au 11 septembre une autre année. La période d’émergence était constante d’année en année (55 jours en moyenne, 50–60 jours) atteignant son maximum entre la 3e semaine de juillet et la 1ère semaine d’août. L’intervalle entre l’émergence des premières femelles dans les cages et l’observation de la première ponte a été le même chaque année, soit 20–23 jours. Les pontes atteignaient leur fréquence maximale au cours des 2e et 3e semaines d’août. L’éclosion moyenne des oeufs a été évaluée à 98%, la survie des larves, à 80%. Les infestations ont atteint plus de 95% des arbres non traités entre le début et le milieu de septembre. Les larves à maturité sont apparues hors des brous au cours de la 4e semaine d’août et leur sortie des noix s’est prolongée jusqu’à la mi-octobre. Les larves s’enfouissaient alors dans le sol, entre 2,5 et 7,6 cm de profondeur, et s’y transformaient en pupes, la plupart dans les 2,5 premiers centimètres de surface.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AliNiazee, M.T. 1974. The western cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis indifferens (Diptera: Tephritidae). 1. Distribution of the diapausing pupae in the soil. The Canadian Entomologist 106: 909912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AliNiazee, M.T. 1976. Thermal unit requirements for determining adult emergence of the western cherry fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Environmental Entomology 5: 397402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AliNiazee, M.T. 1988. Diapause modalities in some Rhagoletis species. pp. 13–25 in AliNiazee, M.T. (Ed.), Ecology and Management of Economically Important Fruit Flies. Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University Special Report 830: 111 pp.Google Scholar
AliNiazee, M.T., and Westcott, R.L.. 1987. Flight period and seasonal development of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Oregon. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 80: 823827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, A.M. 1934. Bionomics of the walnut husk fly, Rhagoletis completa. Hilgardia 8: 363579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirio, U. 1972. Observazioni sul comportamento di ovidepositione della Rhagoletis completa Cresson (Diptera: Trypetidae) in laboratorio. Atti IX Congresso Nazionale Italiano di Entomologia 1972: 99117.Google Scholar
Dean, R.W. 1935. Preoviposition period of the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh), in eastern New York. Journal of Economic Entomology 28: 504.Google Scholar
Dean, R.W., and Chapman, P.J.. 1973. Bionomics of the apple maggot in eastern New York. Search Agriculture (Geneva, New York) 3: 162.Google Scholar
Frick, K.E., Simkover, H.G., and Telford, H.S.. 1954. Bionomics of the Cherry Fruit Flies in Eastern Washington. Washington Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 13: 42 pp.Google Scholar
Gibson, K.E., and Kearby, W.H.. 1978. Seasonal life history of the walnut husk fly (Rhagoletis completa) and husk maggot (Rhagoletis suavis) in Missouri. Environmental Entomology 7: 8187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girolami, V., Strappazon, A., Crnjar, R., Angioy, A.M., Pietra, P., Stoffalano, J.G. Jr., and Prokopy, R.J.. 1986. Behavior and sensory physiology of Rhagoletis pomonella in relation to oviposition stimulants and deterrents in fruit. pp. 183190in Cavalloro, R. (Ed.), Fruit Flies of Economic Importance. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Illingworth, J.F. 1912. A study of the biology of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella, together with an investigation of methods of control. New York (Cornell) Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 324: 160161.Google Scholar
Jones, S.C. 1967. The walnut husk fly and its control. Proceedings of the Nut Growers Society of Oregon and Washington 53: 5962.Google Scholar
Jones, V.P., Alston, D.G., Brunner, J.F., Davis, D.W., and Shelton, M.D.. 1991. Phenology of the western cherry fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Utah and Washington. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 84: 488492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, V.P., Davis, D.W., Smith, S.L., and Allred, D.B.. 1989. Phenology of the apple maggot associated with cherry and hawthorn in Utah. Journal of Economic Entomology 82: 788792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jubb, G.L. Jr., and Cox, J.A.. 1974. Seasonal emergence of two cherry fruit fly species in Eric County, Pennsylvania: A 25-year summary. Journal of Economic Entomology 67: 613615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasana, A., and AliNiazee, M.T.. 1994. Effect of temperature on development of the walnut husk fly, Rhagoletis completa Cresson (Diptera: Tephritidae) under controlled laboratory conditions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 73: 247254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasana, A., and AliNiazee, M.T.. 1995. Adult flight dynamics of walnut husk fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Pan-Pacific Entomology 71: 142148.Google Scholar
Lathrop, F.H., and Dirks, C.O.. 1945. Timing the seasonal cycles of insects: The emergence of Rhagoletis pomonella. Journal of Economic Entomology 38: 330334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legner, E.F., and Goeden, R.D.. 1987. Larval parasitism of Rhagoletis completa (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Juglans microcarpa (Juglandaceae) in western Texas and southeastern New Mexico. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 89: 739743.Google Scholar
Messina, F.J., Alston, D.G., and Jones, V.P.. 1991. Oviposition by the western cherry fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in relation to host development. The Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 64: 197208.Google Scholar
Messina, F.J., and Jones, V.P.. 1990. Relationship between fruit phenology and infestation by the apple maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Utah. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83: 742752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelbacher, A.E., and Ortega, J.C.. 1958. A Technical Study of Insects and Related Pests attacking Walnuts. California Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 764: 86 pp.Google Scholar
Neilson, W.T.A. 1978. Female apple maggot captures and injury to unsprayed apples. Journal of Economic Entomology 71: 755756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, W.T.A., Knowlton, A.D., and McRae, K.B.. 1981. Preoviposition and oviposition periods of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella [Diptera: Tephritidae]. The Canadian Entomologist 113: 10611067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., and Boller, E.F.. 1971. Stimuli eliciting oviposition of European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi (Diptera: Tephritidae) into inanimate objects. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata 14: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, H., and Hoying, S.A.. 1980. Seasonal patterns of emergence, flight activity, and oviposition of the walnut husk fly in northern California. Environmental Entomology 9: 567571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, D.T. 1934. Biological studies of the walnut husk fly [Rhagoletis suavis Loew]. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 20: 717723.Google Scholar
Smith, D.C. 1984. Feeding, mating, and oviposition by Rhagoletis cingulata (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies in nature. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 77: 702704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar