Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:47:31.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEX RATIO VARIABILITY OF MUSCIDIFURAX ZARAPTOR (HYMENOPTERA: PTEROMALIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. G. Wylie
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2M9

Abstract

Females of Muscidifurax zaraptor K. & L. produce a smaller percentage of female progeny as the ratio of ovipositing females to hosts (house fly pupae) increases. Delays in oviposition are apparently responsible for the sex ratio change, because they reduce the percentage of fertilized eggs, i.e. female eggs, that the parasites lay. Delays increase in frequency as the parasite:host ratio increases, and result mostly from interference among the ovipositing females; the interference is mostly or entirely physical. Solitary females of M. zaraptor produce slightly fewer though not significantly fewer female progeny when low host densities delay oviposition; more tests would be required to confirm this effect. There is no evidence for differential survival of the male and female parasite larvae on superparasitized hosts.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, J. F. 1973. Intraspecific competition in the population dynamics of Bracon hebetor Say (Hymenoptera:Braconidae). J. anim. Ecol. 42: 105124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. J. 1966. Observations on the biology of Caraphractus cinctus Walker (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), a parasitoid of the eggs of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera). III. The adult life and sex ratio. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 118: 2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, P. E. 1962. The effect of resorbing eggs upon the sex ratio of the offspring in Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). J. exp. Biol. 39: 161165.Google Scholar
Kogan, M. and Legner, E. F.. 1970. A biosystematic revision of the genus Muscidifurax (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) with descriptions of four new species. Can. Ent. 102: 15231527.Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1974. Chalcidoid (Hymenoptera) parasites of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae) in Alberta and elsewhere in Canada. Can. Ent. 106: 473477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkes, A. 1963. Environmental causes of variation in the sex ratio of an arrhenotokous insect, Dahlbominus fuliginosus (Nees) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Can. Ent. 95: 183202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1966. Some mechanisms that affect the sex ratio of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) (Hymenoptera:Pteromalidae) reared from superparasitized house fly pupae. Can. Ent. 98: 645653.Google Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1971 a. Observations on intraspecific larval competition in three hymenopterous parasites of fly puparia. Can. Ent. 103: 137142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1971 b. Oviposition restraint of Muscidifurax zaraptor (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on parasitized housefly pupae. Can. Ent. 103: 15371544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1976 a. Interference among females of Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and its effect on sex ratio of their progeny. Can. Ent. 108: 655661.Google Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1976 b. Observations on life history and sex ratio variability of Eupteromalus dubius (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a parasite of cyclorrhaphous Diptera. Can. Ent. 108: 12671274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar