Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T22:37:34.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR OF THE MEDITERRANEAN FLOUR MOTH, ANAGASTA KÜHNIELLA: SOME INFLUENCES OF AGE, PHOTOPERIOD, AND LIGHT INTENSITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. M. M. Traynier
Affiliation:
British Columbia Research Council, Vancouver

Abstract

Unmated female A. kühniella (Zell.) emitted a sex pheromone at the beginning of the light period of a 24 hour cycle of light and dark periods. There were no differences apparent in the duration of the calling posture by females in light of 1, 40, or 200 lux. A sex pheromone was extracted from the abdominal tips of unmated females of various ages with organic solvents, 3-day-old females gave the most potent extracts. Extracts of equal potence were obtained from females at different times during the diel cycles of photoperiod. The response of males to the extract was maximal at dawn, increased with age for 5 days, and was greater in light of 1 lux intensity than of 200 lux. Both sexes showed an anticipation of the beginning of the light period in their sexual behaviour, but if the timing of the cycle of photoperiod was changed the behaviour of both sexes became synchronised to the new cycle on its second or third occurrence.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barth, R. 1937. Herkunft, Wirkung und Eigenschaften des weiblichen Sexualduftstoffes einiger Pyraliden. Zool. Jb. (Allgem. Zool. Physiol.) 58: 297329.Google Scholar
Brady, U. E., and Eleanor, B. Smithwick. 1968. Production and release of sex attractant by the female Indian-meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 12601265.Google Scholar
Dickins, G. R. 1936. The scent glands of certain Phycitidae (Lepidoptera). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 85: 331361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. K. 1962. Laboratory determinations of the daily flight times of separate sexes of some moths in naturally changing light. Can. J. Zool. 40: 511530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, L. K., and Shorey, H. H.. 1964. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. IV. An apparatus for bioassaying and pheromone of six species. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 779780.Google Scholar
Hardee, D. D., Mitchell, E. B., and Huddleston, P. M.. 1967. Laboratory studies of sex attraction in the boll weevil. J. econ. Ent. 60: 12211224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, O. W., and Thomson, W. S.. 1932. A contribution to the study of the genera Ephestia Gn. (including Strymax Dyar) and Plodia Gn. (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), with notes on the parasites of the larvae. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 80: 169250.Google Scholar
Sekul, A. A., and Cox, H. C.. 1967. Response of males to the female sex pheromone of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a laboratory evaluation. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 691693.Google Scholar
Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1965. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. V. Circadian rhythm of pheromone-responsiveness in males of Autographa californica, Heliothis virescens, Spokoptera exigua, and Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 58: 597600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L. K., and Fukuto, T. R.. 1964. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. I. A quantitative bioassay for the sex pheromone of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. econ. Ent. 54: 252254.Google Scholar
Traynier, R. M. M. 1968. Sex attraction in the Mediterranean flour moth, Anagasta kühniella: Location of the female by the male. Can. Ent. 100: 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschinkel, W., Willson, C., and Bern, H. A.. 1967. Sex pheromone of the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor). J. exp. Zool. 164: 8186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed