Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T14:02:17.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Similarities in the Histology of the Gut of Some Species of Tribolium Macleay (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) and Oryzaephilus Ganglbauer (Col., Cucujidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. N. Sinha
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, McGill University Montreal 2, Canada

Extract

The alimentary canal of stored grain beetles is relatively simple compared to those of the higher orders of insects. But there are certain specializations from the generalized alimentary canal of the insect described by Snodgrass (1935). Striking similarities of structure have been observed in course of morphological investigation of the alimentary canals of two distantly related groups of beetles living on stored cereals. The differences between the two groups are few.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auten, M. 1933. The structure of the digestive system in Bolitotherus cornutus. Ohio Journal of Science 33(4): 280286.Google Scholar
Black, E. A. and Cotton, R. T.. 1926. Biology of the saw-toothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis Linne. J. Agric. Res. 33: 435452.Google Scholar
Brues, C. T., Melander, A. L. and Carpenter, F. M.. 1954. Classification of insects. Bull. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard College, Cambridge, Mass. 108.Google Scholar
Carter, G. S. 1951. Animal Evolution. Sidgwick and Jackson Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Comstock, J. H. 1940. An introduction to Entomology. Comstock Publishing Company, Inc., Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Cotton, R. T. 1950. Insect pests of stored grain and grain products. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. and Blewett, M.. 1944. Utilization of metabolic water. Bull. Ent. Res. 35: 127139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, N. E. 1935. The Flour Beetles of the genus Tribolium. Ph.D. thesis, George Washington University, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Grouvelle, A. 1912. Synonyms and descriptions of new genera and new types. (In French). Ann. Ent. Soc, France 81: 318320.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E. 1948. A synopsis of the genus Tribolium Macleay, with some remarks on the Evolution of its Species-groups (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Bull. Ent. Res. 39: 1356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsch, G. C. 1931. The Theory of fields of restitution, with special reference to the phenomena of secretion. Biol. Rev. 6: 86131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W. 1956. The biology of the two common storage species of Oryzaephilus (Coleoptera, Cucujidae). Ann. appl. Biol. 44(2): 341355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krall, J. and Jones, D. T.. 1943. Morphology of the digestive tract of Cynaeus augustus LeC., a Tenebrionid. Journal of Science, Iowa State College, 17: 221225.Google Scholar
Lee, A. B. 1937. The Microtomist's Vade-mecum, 10th Ed., edited by Gatenby, J. B. and Painter, T. S.. P. Blakiston's Son and Co., Inc., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L., Flint, W. P. and Metcalf, R. L.. 1951. Destructive and Useful Insects. 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Michener, C. D. 1949. Parallelisms in the Evolution of the Saturnid Moths. Evolution 3(2): 129141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. C. 1931. The alimentary canal of Meracantha contracta Beauv. (Tenebrionidae). Ohio Journal of Science 31(3): 143156.Google Scholar
Mukerji, D. 1937. A note on section cutting of insects. Current Science, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India 6: 16–2.Google Scholar
Mukerji, D. and Sinha, R. N.. 1953. Effect of food on the life history of the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Jour. Kansas Ent. Soc. 26(3): 118124.Google Scholar
Noble, G. K. and Jaeckle, M. E.. 1928. The digital pads of the tree frogs. A study of the phylogenesis of an adaptive structure, J. Morph. 45: 259292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1929. Titanotheres of Ancient Wyoming, Dakota and Nebraska. U.S. Dept. Int. Geol. Surv. Monogr., No. 55.Google Scholar
Pradhan, S. 1939. The alimentary canal and pro-epithelial regeneration in Coccinella septempunctata with a comparison of carnivorous and herbivorous Coccinellids. Quart. Jour. Micr., Sc. 81: 451478.Google Scholar
Pradhan, S. 1937. Labial glands in Coleoptera. Current Science (India) 5: 590591.Google Scholar
Prosser, C. L. 1950. Comparative Animal Physiology. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Roeder, K. D. 1953. Insect Physiology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1949. The meaning of Evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Sinha, R. N. 1953. Sectioning insects with sclerotized cuticle. Stain Technology 28: 249253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinha, R. N. 1958. The alimentary canal of Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Jour. Kansas Ent. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. Principles of Insect Morphology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 1951. The autotrephon: an apparatus for rearing insects under controlled conditions with automatic time controlled withdrawal of samples. Ecology 32: 413442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1953. The Principles of Insect Physiology. Methuen and Co., Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1937. Evolution and adaptation in the digestive system of the Metazoa. Biol. Rev. 12(1): 87115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar