Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T20:18:35.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the Environmental Factors Affecting the Dispersion of House Flies (Musca domestica L.) in a Dairy Community near Fort Whyte, Manitoba1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

William Hanec
William Hanec
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, the University of llilanitoba
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

House fly control as practiced at present requires a combination of thorough sanitation supplemented with the use of insecticides. Farms vary considerably in the standard of sanitation maintained. The question arises whether a farmer who conscientiously applies house fly control measures on his premises will find his efforts frustrated by invasions of house flies breeding on less sanitary farm-steads in the neighborhood. To answer this question it is necessary to understand the factors that affect house fly dispersal. These include wind direction, intensity of mind-borne odors and possibly variation in the tendency of flies to migrate. Some of these questions were answered in investigations during the summer of 3951, by releasing and recovering radioactive house flies in a dairy community near Fort Whyte, Manitoba.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 88 , Issue 6 , June 1956 , pp. 270 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishopp, F. C. and Laake, E. W.. 1921. Dispersion of house flies by flight. Jour. Agr. Res. 2(10): 729–66.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. A. and Lindquist, A. W.. 1951. Studies on treatment of flies with radioactive phosphorus. Jour. Econ. Ent. 44: 471–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, A. W., Yates, W. W. and Hoffman, R. A.. 1951. Studies of the flight habits of three species of flies tagged with radioactive phosphorus. Jour. Econ. Ent. 44(3): 397–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. R. 1916. Dispersion of Musca domestica L. under city conditions in Montana. Jour. Econ. Ent. 9(3): 325–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quartermann, K. D., Mathis, W., and Kilpatrick, J. W.. 1954a. Urban fly dispersal in the area of Savannah, Georgia. Jour. Econ. Ent. 48(3): 405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quartermann, K. D., Kilpatrick, J. W., and W. Mathis. 1954b. Fly dispersal in a rural area near Savannah, Georgia. Jour. Econ. Ent. 47(3): 413–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoof, H. F., Silverly, K. E., and Jensen, J. A.. 1952. House fly dispersion in metropolitan areas. Jour. Econ. Ent. 45(4): 675–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, W. W., Lindquist, A. W., and Butts, J. S.. 1952. Further studies of dispersion of flies tagged with radioactive phosphoric acid. Jour. Econ. Ent. 45(3): 547–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar