We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2014
The life of the overseas Dominions in the past generation has been dominated by the related movements of democracy and nationalism. Here my concern is with a general and comparative treatment of the nature of Dominion nationalism and its influence on the relations of the Dominions to the outer world.
In some important and obvious respects nationality within all the Dominions has common features: it is a growth among immigrant peoples not politically severed entirely from the parent state, and not devoid of loyalty to the parent stock; it is mainly rooted in a culture derived from an older land, and draws inspiration from no wells of a past distinctive only to itself; it cannot in the nature of things nurture the sentiment of “we alone,” and it has not attempted to do so; it is expressed principally in a language common to two powerful world states, one of which has had a great literature for many centuries, and hence it has to be content only with such idioms of speech as local environment slowly brings. In all cases this Dominion nationality has a short history with the emotional shallowness of such. Its spirit is not steeped in the legendary glories of country and town. Unlike the small and intense nationalities of Europe, including the Irish, it rests its claims upon present achievements and future hopes rather than on reference to an epic past, or the tale of oppression suffered at the hands of another. In every Dominion it was both inspired by and expressed in the struggle of people for self-government and democracy, and the political institutions arid ideologies to which it is wedded have a common ancestry. It has arisen within Communities which grew big and prosperous quickly, thanks to a conjuncture of highly favourable world circumstances, notably the rapid industrialization which brought speedy benefit to frontier countries with rich natural resources and abundant land, countries linked to the heart of industrialism and world trade in the period, the British Islands. Related intimately to this circumstance was the Pax Britannica, or long era of relative peace secured by British sea power, which controlled the exits and entrances to the strategic seas and enabled the flow of people and capital, the unhampered occupation of wide territories, and the pursuit of the arts of peace to absorb these frontier communities, and thus achieve that sense of community expressed in their nationality.
1 Round Table Studies, first series, no. 11, p. 92.
2 Cappon, James, Charles G. D. Roberts (Toronto, 1923), p. 108.Google Scholar
3 Quoted by Underhill, F. H. in “Laurier and Blake, 1891-2” (Canadian Historical Review, vol. XXIV, 06, 1943, p. 149).Google Scholar
4 Quoted by Hall, H. Duncan, The British Commonwealth of Nations (London, 1920), p. 209.Google Scholar
5 Jebb, Richard, Studies in Colonial Nationalism (London, 1905), p. viii.Google Scholar
6 Quoted by Bailey, K. H. in “Australia's Membership in the British Commonwealth” (Australia and the Pacific, data paper of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, 1942).Google Scholar
7 That view is clearly enough reflected in the speech of Mr. Curtin before the triennial federal conference of the Australian Labour Party, December 14, 1943. It may be pointed out that the idea of frequent imperial conferences and a permanent secretariat had often been made in the past by Australian public men, notably by Mr. Stanley Bruce when Prime Minister of Australia.
8 Address in London to the Parliamentary Association, November 25, 1943.
