Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T16:00:28.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacterial contamination and cleanliness of emergency department ultrasound probes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2015

Geoffrey E. Sanz
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO
Jonathan Theoret
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
Michael M. Liao
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO
Catherine Erickson
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO
John L. Kendall*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, 777 Bannock Street, Mail Code 0108, Denver, CO 80204; john.kendall@dhha.org

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

As ultrasonography is increasingly used in the emergency department (ED), ultrasound equipment has become a potential threat to infection control. Improperly cleaned ultrasound probes may serve as a vector for pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of MRSA colonization on ultrasound probes used in a busy, urban ED. It was hypothesized that cultures of our ED ultrasound probes would yield a significant number of positive results for MRSA.

Methods:

In this observational study, 11 ED ultrasound probes were randomly sampled on 10 different occasions. Samples were taken using a RODAC plate method and were cultured for MRSA and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). On half of the randomly assigned sampling occasions, a visual inspection of each ultrasound probe for general cleanliness was conducted and recorded. Data were stratified by ultrasound location in the ED and analyzed using the Fisher exact test, with p < 0.05 deemed to be statistically significant.

Results:

Of 110 samples, no isolates of MRSA were cultured. One probe yielded a positive culture for MSSA. Probes in the medicine, trauma, and pediatrics areas were found to be clean 65%, 33%, and 70% of the time, respectively. This variability in probe cleanliness by ED location was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusions:

Contrary to our hypothesis, MRSA contamination of ultrasound probes was not found. This finding suggests that the spread of MRSA by ED ultrasound machines in a high-volume urban ED is unlikely. Further research at different centres with larger sample sizes is required before these results can be generalized.

Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2011

References

REFERENCES

1.Karadeniz, YM, Kilic, D, Altan, SK, et al. Evaluation of the role of ultrasound machines as a source of nosocomial and cross-infection. Invest Radiol 2001;36:554–8, doi:10.1097/00004424-200109000-00009.Google Scholar
2.Spencer, P, Spencer, RC. Ultrasound scanning of postoperative wounds-the risks of cross-infection. Clin Radiol 1988;39:245–6.Google Scholar
3.Whitehead, EJ, Thompson, JF, Lewis, DR. Contamination and decontamination of Doppler probes. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:479–81, doi:10.1308/003588406X114866.Google Scholar
4.Kei, J, Richards, JR. The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on inanimate objects in an urban emergency department. J Emerg Med 2008, doi:10.1016/ j.jemermed.2008.08.002.Google Scholar
5.Fowler, C, McCracken, D. US probes: risk of cross infection and ways to reduce it-comparison of cleaning methods. Radiology 1999;213:299300.Google Scholar