Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-nxk7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-10T09:27:24.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Errors, near misses and adverse events in the emergency department: What can patients tell us?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Steven M. Friedman ,
David Provan ,
Shannon Moore  and
Kate Hanneman
Steven M. Friedman*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto and Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
David Provan
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto and Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
Shannon Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto and Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
Kate Hanneman
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto and Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
*
Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth St., Toronto ON M5G 2C4; steven.friedman@utoronto.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

We sought to determine whether patients or their families could identify adverse events in the emergency department (ED), to characterize patient reports of errors and to compare patient reports to events recorded by health care providers.

Methods:

This was a prospective cohort study in a quaternary care inner city teaching hospital with approximately 40 000 annual visits. ED patients were recruited for participation in a standardized interview within 24 hours of ED discharge and a follow-up interview 3–7 days after discharge. Responses regarding events were tabulated and compared with physician and nurse notations in the medical record and hospital event reporting system.

Results:

Of 292 eligible patients, 201 (69%) were interviewed within 24 hours of ED discharge, and 143 (71% of interviewees) underwent a follow-up interview 3–7 days after discharge. Interviewees did not differ from the base ED population in terms of age, sex or language. Analysis of patient interviews identified 10 adverse events (5% incident rate; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.41%–8.96%), 8 near misses (4% incident rate; 95% CI 1.73%–7.69%) and no medical errors. Of the 10 adverse events, 6 (60%) were characterized as preventable (2 raters; κ = 0.78, standard error [SE] 0.20; 95% CI 0.39–1.00; p = 0.01). Adverse events were primarily related to delayed or inadequate analgesia. Only 4 out of 8 (50%) near misses were intercepted by hospital personnel. The secondary interview elicited 2 out of 10 adverse events and 3 out of 8 near misses that had not been identified in the primary interview. No designation (0 out of 10) of an adverse event was recorded in the ED medical record or in the confidential hospital event reporting system.

Conclusion:

ED patients can identify adverse events affecting their care. Moreover, many of these events are not recorded in the medical record. Engaging patients and their family members in identification of errors may enhance patient safety.

Keywords

errorsnear missadverse eventsemergencypatientpatient safety
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 5 , September 2008 , pp. 421 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2008

References

1.Adams, JG, Bohan, JS. System contributions to error. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1189–93.Google Scholar
2.Weingart, SN, Pagovich, O, Sands, DZ, et al.What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:830–6.Google Scholar
3.Forster, AJ, Murff, HJ, Peterson, JF, et al.The incidence and severity of adverse events affectingpatients following discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:161–7.Google Scholar
4.Forster, AJ, Clark, HD, Menard, A, et al.Adverse events affecting medical patients following discharge from hospital. CMAJ 2004;170:345–9.Google Scholar
5.Burroughs, TE, Waterman, AD, Gallagher, TH, et al.Patient concerns about medical errors in emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:57–64.Google Scholar
6.Forster, AJ, Rose, NGW, Walraven, CV, et al.Adverse events following an emergency department visit. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:17–22.Google Scholar
7.Gandhi, TK, Weingart, SN, Peterson, J, et al.Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1556–64.Google Scholar
8.Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals: the official handbook. Joint Commission Accreditation Healthcare Organizations. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): The Organization; 2006.Google Scholar
9.Pines, JM, Hollander, JE. Emergency department crowding is associated with poor care for patients with severe pain [discussion 6-7]. Ann Emerg Med 2008;51:1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Leape, LL. Error in medicine. JAMA 1994;272:1851–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Cullen, DJ, Bates, DW, Small, SD, et al.The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. JT Comm J Qual Improv 1995;21:541–52.Google Scholar
12.Taylor, JA, Brownstein, D, Christakis, DA, et al.Use of incident reports by physicians and nursesto document medical errors in pediatric patients. Pediatrics 2004;114:729–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Fordyce, J, Blank, FSJ, Pekow, P, et al.Errors in a busy emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:324–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Vincent, C, Stanhope, N, Crowley-Murphy, M. Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study. J Eval Clin Pract 1999;5:13–21.Google Scholar
15.Lawton, R, Parker, D. Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare system. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:15–8.Google Scholar
16.Leape, LL. Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1633–8.Google Scholar
17.Khare, RK, Uren, B, Wears, RL. Capturing more emergency department errors via an anonymous web-based reporting system. Qual Manag Health Care 2005;14:91–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Morey, JC, Simon, R, Jay, GD, et al.Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res 2002;37:1553–81.Google Scholar
19.Elinson, R, Friedman, SM. Emergency Physician Time and Motion Study. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:457-b-458.Google Scholar
20.Wears, RL. A different approach to safety in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:334–46.Google Scholar
21.Lyons, M. Should patients have a rolein patient safety? A safety engineering view. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:140–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar