Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Canada’s Strategy of Dispossession: Aboriginal Land and Rights Cessions in Comprehensive Land Claims

  • Colin Samson (a1)

This paper offers a sociological interpretation of the Canadian Comprehensive Land Claims (CLC) process, arguing that CLC is a strategy used by the state to dispossess Aboriginal peoples. CLC does this through leveraging the cession of Aboriginal rights and the relinquishing of indigenous lands. Drawing upon the ongoing Innu Nation Tshash Petapen (‘New Dawn’) agreement, I examine four related aspects of the process and the agreement which operate to dispossess the Innu: (1) the undemocratic social and political contexts in which agreement is elicited, (2) the depletion of Aboriginal rights of the indigenous party, (3) the depletion of indigenous lands, and (4) the creation of wealth and debt. Finally, I will interpret these processes as building on social changes inflicted on the Innu. These are characterized by imposed law and the state of exception.


Cet article présente une interprétation sociologique du processus canadien de revendications territoriales globales (Comprehensive Land Claims, CLC). L’auteur avance que le CLC est une stratégie employée par l’État pour dépouiller les peuples autochtones, en exploitant les cessions des droits et des territoires autochtones ancestraux. En se fondant sur le processus d’accord « New Dawn » avec la Nation innu Tshash Petapen, l’auteur examine quatre aspects interreliés du processus de négociation et de l’accord qui se conjuguent pour dépouiller les Innus: (1) les contextes social et politique antidémocratiques dans lesquels cet accord est arraché aux Innus, (2) l’extinction des droits ancestraux de la partie autochtone, (3) l’épuisement des territoires ancestraux autochtones et (4) la création de richesse et de dette. Enfin, l’auteur offre une interprétation sociologique de ces processus, selon laquelle ceux-ci se fondent sur des changements imposés aux Innus, sur un système de droit étranger également imposé et sur l’état d’exception.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Christopher Alcantara . 2008. To treaty or not to treaty? Aboriginal peoples and comprehensive land claims negotiations in Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (2): 343–69.

Christopher Alcantara . 2009. Old Wine in New Bottles?: Instrumental Policy Learning and the Evolution of the Certainty Provision in Comprehensive Land Claims. Canadian Public Policy 35 (3): 325–41.

Fernando Aragón . 2015. Do better property rights improve local income?: Evidence from First Nations’ treaties. Journal of Development Economics (0304-3878) 116:4356.

Michael Asch . 2013. On the land cession provisions in Treaty 11. Ethnohistory 60 (3): 451–67.

Carole Blackburn . 2005. Searching for guarantees in the midst of uncertainty: negotiating aboriginal rights and title in British Columbia. American Anthropologist 107 (4): 586–96.

Elizabeth Cassell . 2013. Some reflections on hydroelectric development and the land rights of the Innu who live in Quebec and those who live in Labrador. Journal of Human Rights in the Commonwealth 1 (1): 317.

Glen Coulthard . 2007. Subjects of empire: indigenous peoples and the ‘politics of recognition’ in Canada. Contemporary Political Theory 6 (4): 437–60.

Glen Coulthard . 2014. Red Skins, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Brian Egan , and Jessica Place . 2013. Minding the gaps: property, geography, and Indigenous peoples in Canada. Geoforum 44: 129–38.

S. M. Goldenberg , J. A. Shoveller , M. Koehoorn , and A. S. Ostry . 2010. And they call this progress? Consequences for young people of living and working in resource-extraction communities. Critical Public Health. 20 (2): 157–68.

Cole Harris . 2004. How did colonialism dispossess? Comments from an edge of empire. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (1): 165–82.

André Légaré . 2008. Canada’s experiment with Aboriginal self-determination in Nunavut: from vision to illusion. International Journal on Minority & Group Rights 15: 335–68.

Mahmood Mamdani . 2012. Define and Rule: The W.E.B. DuBois Lectures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sidi M Omar . 2008. The right to self-determination and the indigenous people of Western Sahara. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 (1): 4157.

Jen Preston . 2013. Neoliberal settler colonialism, Canada and the tar sands. Race & Class 55 (2): 4259.

Colin Samson , and Elizabeth Cassell . 2013. The long reach of frontier justice: Canadian land claims “negotiation” strategies as human rights violations. International Journal of Human Rights 17 (1): 3555.

Gerald Sider . 2014. Skin for Skin: Death and Life for Inuit and Innu. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Michael Taussig . 1987. Shamanism, Colonialism and the Wild Man: A Study in Terror and Healing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

James Tully . 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in the Age of Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société
  • ISSN: 0829-3201
  • EISSN: 1911-0227
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-law-and-society-la-revue-canadienne-droit-et-societe
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 56
Total number of PDF views: 172 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 676 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.