Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T01:05:02.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assembling the Emotions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Get access

Extract

Endogenous depression is highly correlated with low levels of serotonin in the central nervous system. Does this imply or suggest that this sort of depression just is this neurochemical deficit? Scorning such an inference, Antonio Damasio writes:

If feeling happy or sad … corresponds in part to the cognitive modes under which your thoughts are operating, then the explanation also requires that the chemical acts on the circuits which generate and manipulate [such thoughts]. Which means that reducing depression to a statement about the availability of serotonin or norepinephrine in general- a popular statement in the days and age of Prozac- is unacceptably rude (1995, 161).

Damasio's thought is that depression is essentially a modification of how we perceive the world, reason about it, and make decisions about how to act in it - in other words, that it is essentially cognitive. A reduced level of serotonin might cause the said modification, but no adequate account of depression would identify the malady with its cause. A proper account would minimally need to say how cognitive processing is affected by a reduced level of serotonin.

Type
3. The Analogy with Perception
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergeron, V. 2007 Anatomical and functional modularity in cognitive science: Shifting the focus. Philosophical Psychology 20: 175-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, W. 1927. The James-Lange theory of emotions: A critical examination and alternative theory. American Journal of Psychology 39: 106-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castnén, E. 2005. Is mood chemistry? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 241-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M. 1999. Modularity and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 115-20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coltheart, M. 2001. Assumptions and methods in cognitive neuropsychology. In The Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology, ed. Rapp, B., 321. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. 1995. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
A. R, Damasio, Grabowski, T. J., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Ponto, L. L. B. and Haichwa, Richard D.. 2000. Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nature Neuroscience 3: 10491056.Google Scholar
de Sousa, R. 1987. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., and Gore, J. C.. 1999. Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience 2(6): 568-73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., and Anderson, A. W.. 2000. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience 3: 191-97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glover, S. 2004. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 324.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodale, M. A. 2001. Why vision is more than seeing. In Naturalism, Evolution, and Intentionality, Canadian Journal of Philosophy supplementary volume 27: 187214.Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N. 2003. The ventral visual object pathway in humans: Evidence from fMRI. In The Visual Neurosciences, ed. Chalupa, L. and Werner, J., 1179–89. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., and Chun, M. M.. 1997. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17: 43024311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleist, K. 1934. Kriegsverletzungen des Gehirns in ihrer Bedeutung fiir die Hirnlokalisation und Hirnpathologie. In Handbuch der Aerzlichen Erfahrungen im Weltkriege 1914-18. Vol. 4: Geistes-und Nervenkrankheit, ed. Bonhoefer, K., 3431360. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Latto, R. 2004. Form follows function in visual information processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 4344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, M. 2005. Seeing, Doing, and Knowing: A Philosophical Theory of SensePerception. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, B. 1964. Some effects of frontal lobectomy in Man. In The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behavior, ed. Warren, J. and Akert, K., 313-31. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
A. D, Milner, and M.A. Goodale. 1995. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University.Press.Google Scholar
Rumiati, R. I., and Humphreys, G. W.. 1997. Visual object agnosia without alexia or prosopagnosia. Visual Cognition 4: 207217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, S., and Singer, J. E.. 1962. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review 69: 379-99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
W. B, Scoville, and Milner, B.. 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 20: 1121.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. 1988. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsao, D. Y., Tootell, R. B. H., and Livingstone, M. S.. 2006. A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science 311: 670-74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F., Spelke, E. S., and Goddard, S.. 2005. Number sense in human infants. Developmental Science 8: 88101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zihl, J., Cramon, D. von, and Mai, N.. 1983. Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain 106: 313-40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed