No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Right To Know In The Workplace*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Extract
In recent years, the right of employees to know about health hazards in the workplace has emerged as a major issue in occupational health policy. A general consensus has gradually evolved that there is a right to know, and correlatively that there is a moral obligation to disclose relevant information to workers. For example, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and several other U.S. federal agencies, informed the U.S. Senate as early as July 1977 that ‘workers have the right to know whether or not they are exposed to hazardous chemical and physical agents regulated by the Federal Government.’ In 1980, the Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration (OSHA) promulgated regulations guaranteeing workers access to medical and exposure records.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 8: New Essays in Ethics and Public Policy , 1982 , pp. 177 - 210
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Authors 1982
Footnotes
*
Copyright 1982, Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp. Work on this essay was supported by a grant from the National Library of Medicine. Earlier drafts were read at the Philosophy Department, University of Pittsburgh, at the School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, at the Hastings Center, and at the Philosophy Department, the University of Colorado. We received valuable comments that altered the substance and form of the paper from Stephen Teret and Nancy King. We are also indebted to Alasdair Macintyre, Terry Pinkard, Ron Giere, Arthur Caplan, Rachel Laudan, Kurt Baier, Nicholas Rescher, David Braybrooke, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., Gilbert Omenn, and Deborah Kohrman for helpful comments and criticism. Small excerpts taken from a much earlier draft of Sections I, Ill, V, VI and IX were previously published in Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, 2nd ed. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1982). While the bulk of references are to U.S. sources, the issues of policy surpass national boundaries.
References
Select Bibliography
Ashford, Nicholas, and Katz, Judith P., ‘Unsafe Working Conditions: Employee Rights Under the Labor Management Relations Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Act,’ Notre Dame Lawyer, 52 (1977) 802–37.Google Scholar
Bloom, Barry, ‘News About Carcinogens: What's Fit to Print?’ The Hastings Center Report, 9 (August, 1979) 5–7, with a response by Upton, Arthur C., ‘Carcinogen Testing and Public Information,’ The Hastings Center Report, 10 (February, 1980) 9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch, ‘Informed Consent for Transient Nuclear Workers,’ in Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste Management, edited by Kasperson, R. and Kates, R. (Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, and Hair, Inc. 1983).Google Scholar
Frank, Nancy K., ‘A Question of Equity: Workers’ “Right to Refuse” Under OSHA Compared to the Criminal Necessity Defense,’ Labor Law journal, 31 (1980) 617–26.Google Scholar
Johnson, Deborah, ‘Individual Consent and Toxic Substances,’ in Toxic Substances and Trade Secrecy, Technical Information Project (Washington: Technical Information Project 1977).Google Scholar
Melville, Mary, ‘Risks on the job: The Worker's Right to Know,’ Environment, 23 (1981).Google Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, ‘Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records- Final Rules,’ Federal Register, May 23, 1980, 35212-77.Google Scholar
Preston, Susan, ‘A Right Under OSHA to Refuse Unsafe Work or A Hobson's Choice of Safety or job?,’ University of Baltimore Law Review, 8 (1979) 519–50.Google Scholar
Richter, Elihu D., ‘The Worker's Right to Know: Obstacles, Ambiguities, and Loopholes,' journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 6 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogl, P. (editor), Public Information in the Prevention of Occupational Cancer: Proceedings of a Symposium, December 2–3, 1976 (Washington: National Academy of Sciences, 1977).Google Scholar