Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T20:50:33.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Family of Regular Maps of Type {6, 6}

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

F.A. Sherk*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In (4), pp. 25−27, Coxeter divided the regular maps on a surface of genus 1 into three infinite families. They are:

  1. (i) Maps of type {4, 4}.

  2. (ii) Maps of type {6, 3}.

  3. (iii) Maps of type {3, 6} (the duals of (ii)).

We consider the family (iii). By adjoining an element to the group of any map in (iii) we shall derive the group of a regular map of type {6, 6}. Thus we produce a 1−1 correspondence between the members of the family (iii) and of the new family. Corresponding members in the two families have certain properties in common, the most interesting of which is the property of reflexibility. Our results are summarized in Theorems 1 and 2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1962

References

1. Brahana, H. R., Regular Maps and their Groups, Amer. J. Math., 49 (1927), 268-84.Google Scholar
2. Coxeter, H. S. M., The Abstract Groups Gm, n, p , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 45 (1939), 73-150.Google Scholar
3. Coxeter, H. S. M., Regular Polytopes (London, 1948).Google Scholar
4. Coxeter, H. S. M., Configurations and Maps, Reports of a Math. Colloq. (2), 8 (1948), 18-38.Google Scholar
5. Coxeter, H. S. M., Introduction to Geometry (New York, 1961).Google Scholar
6. Coxeter, H. S. M. and Moser, W. O. J., Generators and Relations for Discrete Groups, Ergebn. Math., 14 (1957).Google Scholar
7. Frucht, R., A One-regular Graph of Degree Three, Can. J. Math., 4 (1952), 240-7.Google Scholar
8. Sherk, F. A., The Regular Maps on a Surface of Genus Three, Can. J. Math., 11 (1959), 452-480.Google Scholar