Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:58:56.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Law of Sovereign Immunity and Terrorism. Par James Cooper-Hill. New York: Oceana Publications, 2006. 333 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

François Larocque
François Larocque*
Affiliation:
Faculté de droit, Section de common law, Université d’Ottawa
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews / Recensions de livres
Information
Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international , Volume 45 , 2008 , pp. 611 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Council on International Law / Conseil Canadien de Droit International, representing the Board of Editors, Canadian Yearbook of International Law / Comité de Rédaction, Annuaire Canadien de Droit International 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fox, H., The Law of State Immunity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) à la P. 3.Google Scholar

2 Lauterpacht, H., “The Problem of Jurisdictional Immunities of Foreign States” (1951) 28 Br. Y.B. Int’l L. 220.Google Scholar

3 Sinclair, I., “The Law of Sovereign Immunity: Recent Developments” (1980–II) 167 Rec. des Cours 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Badr, G., State Immunity: An Analytical and Prognostic View (La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Trooboff, P.D., “Foreign State Immunity: Emerging Consensus on Principles” (1986–V) 200 Rec. des Cours 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Pingel-Lenuzza, I., Les immunités des états en droit international (Bruxelles: Éditions Bruylant, 1998).Google Scholar

7 Amerada Hess Shipping Corp. c. Republic of Argentina, 488 U.S. 428 (1989).

8 The Schooner Exchange c. McFaddon, 7 Cranch 116 (1812).

9 Siderman de Blake c. Republic of Argentina, 965 F. 2d 699 (9th Cir. 1992).

10 Sampson c. Federal Republic of Germany, 250 F. 3d 1145 (7th Cir. 2001).

11 Voir e.g. Taylor, A., “Another Front in the War on Terrorism? Problems with Recent Changes to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act” (2003) 45 Ariz. L. Rev. 533Google Scholar; Reisman, M. & Hakimi, M., ”Illusion and Reality in the Compensation of Victims of International Terrorism” (2003) 54 Ala. L. Rev. 561Google Scholar; Sealing, K., ”‘State Sponsors of Terrorism’ Is a Question Not an Answer: The Terrorism Amendment to the FSIA Makes Less Sense Now Than It Did Before 9/11” (2003) 38 Tex. Int’l L. J. 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shook, K., “State Sponsors of Terrorism are Persons, Too: The Flatow Mistake” (2000) 61 Ohio St. L. J. 1301.Google Scholar

12 CRS Report for Congress: Suits against Terrorist States by Victims of Terrorism, 17 décembre 2007, Order Code 31258, à la p. 52, <http://fas.org/sgp/crs/terror/RL31258.pdf>.