Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:25:11.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variability of antithrombotics use in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and its variants following first- and second-stage palliation surgery: a national report using the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative registry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Preeti Ramachandran*
Affiliation:
The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
Eileen King
Affiliation:
Division of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
Ashley Nebbia
Affiliation:
Division of Pharmacy, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
Robert H. Beekman 3rd
Affiliation:
The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
Jeffrey B. Anderson
Affiliation:
The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: P. Ramachandran, MD, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 2003, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, United States of America. Tel: +248 760 1768; E-mail: preeti.ramachandran@cchmc.org

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and its variants following palliation surgery are at risk for thrombosis. This study examines variability of antithrombotic practice, the incidence of interstage shunt thrombosis, and other adverse events following Stage I and Stage II palliation within the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative registry.

Methods

We carried out a multicentre, retrospective review using the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative registry including patients from 2008 to 2013 across 52 surgical sites. Antithrombotic medications used at Stage I and Stage II discharge were evaluated. Variability of antithrombotics use at the individual patient level and intersite variability, incidence of shunt thrombosis, and other adverse events such as cardiac arrest, seizure, stroke, and need for cardiac catheterisation intervention in the interstage period were identified. Antithrombotic strategies for hybrid Stage I patients were evaluated but they were excluded from the variability and outcomes analysis.

Results

A total of 932 Stage I and 923 Stage II patients were included in the study: 93.8% of Stage I patients were discharged on aspirin and 4% were discharged on no antithrombotics, and 77% of Stage II patients were discharged on aspirin and 17.5% were discharged on no antithrombotics. Only three patients (0.2%) presented with interstage shunt thrombosis. The majority of patients who died during interstage or required shunt dilation and/or stenting were discharged home on aspirin.

Conclusion

Aspirin is the most commonly used antithrombotic following Stage I and Stage II palliation. There is more variability in the choice of antithrombotics following Stage II compared with Stage I. The incidence of interstage shunt thrombosis and associated adverse events was rare.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Norwood, WI, Lang, P, Hansen, DD. Physiologic repair of aortic atresia-hypoplastic left heart syndrome. N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 2326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Galantowicz, M, Cheatham, JP. Lessons learned from the development of a new hybrid strategy for the management of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 2005; 26: 190199.Google Scholar
3. Cross, RR, Harahsheh, AS, McCarter, R, et al. Identified mortality risk factors associated with presentation, initial hospitalisation, and interstage period for the Norwood operation in a multi-centre registry: a report from the national pediatric cardiology-quality improvement collaborative. Cardiol Young 2014; 24: 253262.Google Scholar
4. Ghanayem, NS, Allen, KR, Tabbutt, S, et al. Interstage mortality after the Norwood procedure: results of the multicenter Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 896906.Google Scholar
5. Pasquali, SK, Ohye, RG, Lu, M, et al. Variation in perioperative care across centers for infants undergoing the Norwood procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 915921.Google Scholar
6. Tabbutt, S, Ghanayem, N, Ravishankar, C, et al. Risk factors for hospital morbidity and mortality after the Norwood procedure: a report from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 882895.Google Scholar
7. Hornik, CP, He, X, Jacobs, JP, et al. Relative impact of surgeon and center volume on early mortality after the Norwood operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 19921997.Google Scholar
8. Jonas, RA, Jacobs, JP, Jacobs, ML, et al. Reporting of mortality associated with pediatric and congenital cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: 726727; author reply 26–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Karamichalis, JM, del Nido, PJ, Thiagarajan, RR, et al. Early postoperative severity of illness predicts outcomes after the stage I Norwood procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 660665.Google Scholar
10. Jacobs, JP, O’Brien, SM, Pasquali, SK, et al. Variation in outcomes for risk-stratified pediatric cardiac surgical operations: an analysis of the STS congenital heart surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94: 564571; discussion 71–72.Google Scholar
11. Fenton, KN, Siewers, RD, Rebovich, B, et al. Interim mortality in infants with systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunts. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 152156; discussion 56–57.Google Scholar
12. Azakie, T, Merklinger, SL, McCrindle, BW, et al. Evolving strategies and improving outcomes of the modified Norwood procedure: a 10-year single-institution experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 13491353.Google Scholar
13. Li, JS, Yow, E, Berezny, KY, et al. Clinical outcomes of palliative surgery including a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt in infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease: does aspirin make a difference? Circulation 2007; 116: 293297.Google Scholar
14. Monagle, P, Chan, AK, Goldenberg, NA, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (Suppl 2): e737Se7801.Google Scholar
15. Manlhiot, C, Brandao, LR, Kwok, J, et al. Thrombotic complications and thromboprophylaxis across all three stages of single ventricle heart palliation. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 51319 e3.Google Scholar
16. Manlhiot, C, Menjak, IB, Brandao, LR, et al. Risk, clinical features, and outcomes of thrombosis associated with pediatric cardiac surgery. Circulation 2011; 124: 15111519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Cholette, JM, Rubenstein, JS, Alfieris, GM, et al. Elevated risk of thrombosis in neonates undergoing initial palliative cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 13201325.Google Scholar
18. Levy, JH, Tanaka, KA. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: S715S720.Google Scholar
19. Jahangiri, M, Kreutzer, J, Zurakowski, D, et al. Evaluation of hemostatic and coagulation factor abnormalities in patients undergoing the Fontan operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120: 778782.Google Scholar
20. Wells, WJ, Yu, RJ, Batra, AS, et al. Obstruction in modified Blalock shunts: a quantitative analysis with clinical correlation. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 20722076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Al Jubair, KA, Al Fagih, MR, Al Jarallah, AS, et al. Results of 546 Blalock-Taussig shunts performed in 478 patients. Cardiol Young 1998; 8: 486490.Google Scholar
22. Giglia, TM, Massicotte, MP, Tweddell, JS, et al. Prevention and treatment of thrombosis in pediatric and congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 128: 26222703.Google Scholar
23. Wessel, DL, Berger, F, Li, JS, et al. Clopidogrel in infants with systemic-to-pulmonary-artery shunts. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 23772384.Google Scholar
24. Kugler, JD, Beekman Iii, RH, Rosenthal, GL, et al. Development of a pediatric cardiology quality improvement collaborative: from inception to implementation. From the Joint Council on Congenital Heart Disease Quality Improvement Task Force. Congenit Heart Dis 2009; 4: 318328.Google Scholar
25. Alkhulaifi, AM, Lacour-Gayet, F, Serraf, A, et al. Systemic pulmonary shunts in neonates: early clinical outcome and choice of surgical approach. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 14991504.Google Scholar
26. Galantowicz, M, Yates, AR. Improved outcomes with the comprehensive stage 2 procedure after an initial hybrid stage 1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151: 424429.Google Scholar
27. Mir, A, Frank, S, Journeycake, J, et al. Aspirin resistance in single-ventricle physiology: aspirin prophylaxis is not adequate to inhibit platelets in the immediate postoperative period. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99: 21582164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Heistein, LC, Scott, WA, Zellers, TM, et al. Aspirin resistance in children with heart disease at risk for thromboembolism: prevalence and possible mechanisms. Pediatr Cardiol 2008; 29: 285291.Google Scholar
29. Romlin, BS, Wahlander, H, Stromvall-Larsson, E, et al. Monitoring of acetyl salicylic acid-induced platelet inhibition with impedance aggregometry in children with systemic-to-pulmonary shunts. Cardiol Young 2013; 23: 225232.Google Scholar