Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:25:36.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in the oval fossa: is the method applicable in small children?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Per G. Bjørnstad*
Affiliation:
Departments of Paediatric Cardiology, Rikshospitalet, The National Hospital, University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Henrik Holmstrøm
Affiliation:
Departments of Paediatric Cardiology, Rikshospitalet, The National Hospital, University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Bjarne Smevik
Affiliation:
Paediatric Radiology, Rikshospitalet, The National Hospital, University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Tor Inge Tønnessen
Affiliation:
Anesthesiology, Rikshospitalet, The National Hospital, University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Erik Fosse
Affiliation:
The Interventional Centre, Rikshospitalet, The National Hospital, University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
*
Dept of Paediatric Cardiology, Rikshospitalet – The National Hospital, N-0027 Oslo, Norway. Tel: +47 23074542; Fax: +47 23072330; E-mail: per.bjornstad@rikshospitalet.no

Abstract

We report our experience from 1996 through 1999, representing our initial experience with use of the Amplatzer device to close atrial septal defects. Of 46 patients taken to the catheter laboratory with the intention to close the defect, the device was permanently implanted in 40 (87%). They were aged between 1.4 and 71.8 years, with weights ranging from 7.8 to 90 kg. Both age and weight distributed into two peaks, demonstrating two different populations. The size of the devices, taking the biggest device if two were inserted, was between 9 and 30 mm. We underwent a short learning curve, but the time required for fluoroscopy, or the number of difficulties experienced, showed no connection with the size or age of the patient, nor the size of the defect itself. A suspicion that young age and small size would increase the risk and difficulties, and result in more interrupted procedures, could not be substantiated. In children no interruption was procedural. Our early experience, therefore, demonstrates that an experienced interventional team can use the Amplatzer occluder successfully to close atrial septal defects in patients of all ages and sizes, at least from 7.8 kg and up.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Berger, F, Ewert, P, Bjornstad, PG et al. , Transcatheter closure as standard treatment for most interatrial defects: experience in 200 patients treated with the Amplatzer septal occluder. Cardiol Young 1999; 9: 468473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Fischer, G, Kramer, HH, Stieh, J, Harding, P, Jung, O. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects with the new self-centering Amplatzer septal occluder. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 541549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Berger, F, Vogel, M, Alexi-Meskishvili, V, Lange, PE. Comparison of results and complications of surgical and Amplatzer device closure of atrial septal defects. J Thorac Cardiov Sur 1999; 118: 674678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Walsh, KP, Maadi, IM. The Amplatzer septal occluder. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 493501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Vogel, M, Berger, F, Dahnert, I, Ewert, P, Lange, PE. Treatment of atrial septal defects in symptomatic children aged less than 2 years of age using the Amplatzer septal occluder. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 534537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Rastegari, M, Redington, AN, Sullivan, ID. Influence of the introduction of Amplatzer device on the interventional closure of defects within the oval fossa in children. Cardiol Young 2001; 11: 521525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Bjornstad, PG.Interventional closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer device: first clinical experience. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 277283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar