Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:59:40.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Did Germany Go Right?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2018

Charles S. Maier*
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Extract

To set a single agenda for German history would be a foolhardy task, but let us begin with a major generalization about the long-term development of the field. Two mega-issues have dominated the historiography and debates for a century or more, standing on the path of historical research like some huge boulders that can not be moved or even circumvented. The first concerns how the German communities of Central Europe had constructed a nation-state—Tantae molis erat Germanam condere gentem, to adapt Vergil. There was a Prussian-centered statist answer by scholars including Leopold von Ranke, Heinrich von Treitschke, and Friedrich Meinecke, and continuing through Christopher Clark's Iron Kingdom. A more decentered approach has, by contrast, stressed local experiences; liberal and participatory currents of a political or religious (often Roman Catholic in sympathy, e.g., the work of Franz Schnabel) or cultural nature; and, finally, the heritage of a federalist constitutionalism, whether instantiated in the Holy Roman Empire or in the later celebratory afterglow of Heimat. The second mega-issue that dominated the historiography for the first generation—perhaps half-century—after World War II and the collapse of Nazism was one that I was asked about at my undergraduate oral examinations in the spring of 1960: Where did Germany go wrong? The catastrophic career of National Socialist Germany, both internally and for Europe in general, compelled my generation and later ones never to lose sight of that issue. Even those who rejected claims about long-term disabling flaws in the emergence of liberal democracy—the political original sin, so to speak—had to address that fundamental issue.

Type
Part III: Reveries and Reverberations
Copyright
Copyright © Central European History Society of the American Historical Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Clark, Christopher, Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

2 Port, Andrew I., ed., “Holocaust Scholarship and Politics in the Public Sphere: Reexamining the Causes, Consequences, and Controversy of the Historikerstreit and the Goldhagen Debate: A Forum with Gerrit Dworok, Richard J. Evans, Mary Fulbrook, Wendy Lower, A. Dirk Moses, Jeffrey K. Olick, and Timothy D. Snyder,” CEH 50, no. 3 (2017): 375–403Google Scholar.

3 Blackbourn, David and Eley, Geoff, The Peculiarities of German History: Bourgeois Society and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Germany (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Anderson, Margaret Lavinia, Practicing Democracy: Elections and Political Culture in Imperial Germany (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar. See also Suval, Stanley, Electoral Politics in Imperial Germany (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1985)Google Scholar, as well as Jürgen Kocka's contribution to this commemorative issue.

4 Craig, Gordon A., Germany, 1866–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978)Google Scholar; Sheehan, James J., German History, 1770–1866 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

5 Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte, 5 vols. (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1987–2008)Google Scholar; Winkler, Heinrich August, Germany: The Long Road West, 2 vols., trans. Sager, Alexander J. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006–2007)Google Scholar.

6 Steinmetz, George G., The Devil's Handwriting: Precoloniality and the German Colonial State in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zimmerman, Andrew, Alabama in Africa: Booker T. Washington, the German Empire, and the Globalization of the New South (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Marchand, Suzanne, German Orientalism in the Age of Empire: Religions, Race, and Scholarship (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

7 See Fulbrook, Mary, Subjectivity and History: Approaches to Twentieth-Century German Society (London: German Historical Institute, 2017)Google Scholar; idem, The People's State: East German Society from Hitler to Honecker (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005)Google Scholar. Also see Betts, Paul, Within Walls: Private life in the German Democratic Republic (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Jarausch, Konrad Hugo, After Hitler: Recivilizing Germans, 1945–1995, trans. Hunzinger, Brandon (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Maier, Charles S., “The End of Longing?  (Notes toward a History of Postwar German National Longing),” in The Postwar Transformation of Germany: Democracy, Prosperity, and Nationhood, ed. Brady, John S., Crawford, Beverly, and Wiliarty, Sara Elise (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999), 271–85Google Scholar.

10 Niethammer, Lutz, von Plato, Alexander, and Wierling, Dorothee, Die volkseigene Erfahrung: Eine Archäologie des Lebens in der Industrieprovinz der DDR: 30 biografische Eröffnungen (Berlin: Rowohlt, 1991)Google Scholar; also see Niethammer, Lutz, ed., “Die Jahre weiss man nicht, wo man die heute hinsetzen soll”—Faschismuserfahrungen im Ruhrgebiet (Berlin: Dietz, 1983)Google Scholar.

11 See Bavaj, Riccardo and Steber, Martina, eds., Germany and “The West”: The History of a Modern Concept (New York: Berghahn, 2017)Google Scholar.