Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T09:21:25.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children, Youth, Elders. Re-linking the Generations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Don Edgar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the Australian Institute of Family Studies was established in 1980, we have kept in mind two slogans about family links and supports: ‘Every individual has a family’; and ‘The family does not stop at the front door’. What we meant was that family policy cannot be based solely on a static image of parents and children living together under the one roof.

Most families start off as a couple, then go through a stage of parents and children living in one household. But once the children have grown and gone, does the couple no longer have a family? If the parents separate or divorce, do the children not have any family? When a partner dies or the children are grown, the family still exists, though the patterns of interaction have changed. Thus family policy has to address the nature of these interactions, across households and across time.

Type
Family and Community
Information
Children Australia , Volume 15 , Special Issue 2: The State of Australia's Children , 1990 , pp. 19 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amato, P. (1987), Children in Australian Families: The Growth of Competence, Prentice-Hall, Sydney.Google Scholar
Ben-David, J. (1963–1964). ‘Professions in the Class System of Present-Day Societies’, Current Sociology No. 12, pp.247–330.Google Scholar
Boocock, S.S. (1975). ‘The Social Context of Childhood’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. No. 119, Nov. p.428 Google Scholar
Conference Board (1988). Beyond Business/Education Partnerships: The Business Experience, Research Report No.918, New York.Google Scholar
Dunkerley, D. (1975). Occupations and Society, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Edgar, D.E. (1985). ‘Getting the Family Act Together: Children, Competence and Family Process’, VIER Bulletin, No. 54, June pp. 26–63.Google Scholar
Elder, G.H. Jr (1974). Children of the Great Depression, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Greer, G. (1984). Sex and Destiny, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Hartley, R. H. (1989). What Price Independence? Australian Institute of Family Studies - YAC Vic, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1977). ‘The Child in the Family’, Daedalus, No.43, Spring.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1972). Blackberry Winter, Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R.H. (1978). Child, Family and State, Little Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
Morgan, D.H.J. (1985). The Family, Politics and Social Theory, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Newman, S. (1989). ‘A History of Intergenerational Programs’, Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, Vol.20, No.3/4, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D.E. (1983). The Television Family, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave, Bantam, New York.Google Scholar
Vollmer, H.M. and Mills, D.L. (1966). Professionilisation, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Whiting, B. and Whiting, J.W.M. (1975), Children in Six Cultures, Harvard University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. (1985). Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Reprinted with permission from Family Matters No. 25 December 1989 - Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar