Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T13:58:58.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Personal safety curriculum in junior primary classrooms: Are teachers teaching it?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Sarah Whiteside*
Affiliation:
de Lissa Institute, University of South Australia. Email: spring65@picknowlcom.au

Abstract

Previous studies have revealed that the teaching of personal safety strategies to children is spasmodic and selective, avoiding vital information that would help children to identify and report sexual abuse. In this study a questionnaire was used to explore the views of 33 South Australian junior primary teachers regarding the teaching of personal safety to children.

Results showed that most of the participating teachers claimed to teach some personal safety skills, using a variety of materials and methods, but it would appear that they concentrated on ‘safe’ topics such as road safety and avoided topics relating to child sexual abuse and violence. It was also found that 50% had not undertaken any training within the last two years even though the overwhelming majority felt that further training was required in order to teach topics effectively. This suggested that motivation for teaching personal safety was low. These and other findings are discussed and recommendations for greater emphasis on training of teachers and further research into this area are made.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Education Council (1994) A statement on health and physical education, Curriculum Corporation, Carlton, Vic.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2000) Publications – Welfare: Child Protection Australia 1998–99, Chapter 2.Google Scholar
Bell, J (1993) Doing your research project, 7 th edn, Open University Press, Buckingham.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. (1987) ‘South Australian parents want child protection programs to be offered in schools and preschools’, Australian Journal of Early Childhood, vol. 12, no. 1, pp.2025.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. (1989) First Report: Evaluation of the Protective Behaviours Program in Eight Education Department Junior Primary Schools, Report to the Director General for Education, South Australia, November-December.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. (1997) ‘The Importance of Schools and Early Childhood Centres in Child Protection’, Journal of Child Centred Practice, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.1121.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Hawkins, R. (1997) Child Protection: A guide for teachers and childcare professionals, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, NSW.Google Scholar
Butler, S. (1986) ‘Thinking about prevention education - A critical look’, in Nelson, M. & Clark, K. (eds), The educators guide to preventing child sexual abuse, Network Publications, Santa Cruz, pp.614.Google Scholar
Calvert, O. (1993) Preventing Child Abuse, National Child Protection Council, Canberra.Google Scholar
Daugherty, L. B. (1986) ‘What happens to victims of child sexual abuse?’, in Nelson, M. & Clark, K. (eds), The educators guide to preventing child sexual abuse, Network Publications, Santa Cruz, pp. 4735.Google Scholar
Department of Education Training and Employment (2000) South Australian Curriculum Standards and Accountability Framework (SACSA) Trialling Draft.Google Scholar
Department of Education Training and Employment. (1998) Policy Statement: Child Protection.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D. (1986) ‘Implications for theory, research and practice’, in Nelson, M. & Clark, K. (eds), The educators guide to preventing child sexual abuse, Network Publications, Santa Cruz, pp. 133146.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D., Asdigian, N. & Dziuba-Leatherman, J. (1993) Victimization prevention training in action: A national survey of children’s experiences coping with actual threats and assaults, Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R.M.F. & Briggs, F. (1999) ‘Partnerships between parents and teachers in child protection’, Children Australia, vol. 24, no. 1, pp.813.Google Scholar
Herald, Sun (Author unknown) (2000) ‘Teachers in fear after abuse case’, 17th June, p.12.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1995) An evaluation of the use and impact of a school based child abuse prevention program, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1996) ‘Children’s responses to threats to their personal safety’, International Journal of Protective Behaviours, vol. 1, no. 1. pp.634.Google Scholar
Kleemeier, C., Webb, C., Hazzard, A. & Pohl, J. (1988) ‘Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Evaluation of a Teacher Training Model’, Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 12, pp. 555561.Google Scholar
Kumar, R. (1996) Research Methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners, Longman, Melbourne.Google Scholar
McGurk, H, & Hazel, V. (1998) The economic cost of child abuse and neglect in South Australia, Australian Institute of Family Studies and The Office for Families and Children, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Macintyre, D. & Carr, A. (1999) Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse in Ireland - The Development and Evaluation of the Stay Safe Programme, Edwin Mellen Press, Wales.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. H. (1990) Evaluating the implementation of the Keeping Ourselves Safe Child Sexual Abuse Prevention education Programme, unpublished Master of Education Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Wurtele, S. K. (1987) ‘School-based sexual abuse prevention programs: A review’, Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 11, pp.483495.Google Scholar