Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T22:39:56.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Pedagogy: Differences and Links to Existing Child Care Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2015

Robyn Kemp*
Affiliation:
ThemPra Social Pedagogy C.I.C., United Kingdom. robyn@thempra.org.uk
*
*address for correspondence: Robyn Kemp, Associate Project Manager, ThemPra Social Pedagogy C.I.C., 95 Thorpe Road, Forest Gate, London E7 9EA, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Some commentators have pointed to the United Kingdom (UK) having a tendency towards reducing ‘new’ concepts or practices so much that they bear little resemblance to the original form. This is why I wish to highlight in this article some of the sometimes subtle, yet profound, differences in a social pedagogical approach to child care in order to better understand the potential of social pedagogy for developing practice. There are five main sections to this article: first, I describe social pedagogy and a conceptualisation of a social pedagogical approach; second, the UK context is examined so as to set the scene for the third, fourth and fifth sections, which examine reflection, relationships and the concept of lifespace through a social pedagogic lens, drawing links to existing good practice in the UK. Although this commentary does not discuss Australian practice, I believe there are some important aspects in the way in which the UK has tried to familiarise itself with social pedagogy that can help Australian readers to better understand some of the subtleties and nuances of the paradigm and inspire their own reflections.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)