Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 10
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Burnay, Matthieu Hivonnet, Joëlle and Raube, Kolja 2016. Bridging the EU-China’s gap on the Rule of Law?. Asia Europe Journal, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 95.

    Li, Ji 2015. The Leviathan's RulebyLaw. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 12, Issue. 4, p. 815.

    Sevin, Efe and Björner, Emma 2015. A new China: Media portrayal of Chinese mega-cities. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 309.

    Yee, Wai-Hang Tang, Shui-Yan and Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung 2014. Regulatory Compliance when the Rule of Law Is Weak: Evidence from China’s Environmental Reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, p. muu025.

    Malmgren, Otto 2013. Article 37: The right to liberty of person under the Chinese constitution. China-EU Law Journal, Vol. 2, Issue. 1-2, p. 35.

    Li, Ling 2012. The “Production” of Corruption in China's Courts: Judicial Politics and Decision Making in a One-Party State. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 848.

    Chan, Chris King-Chi Ngai, Pun and Chan, Jenny 2010. Globalization and Labour in China and India.

    Solomon, Peter H. 2010. Authoritarian legality and informal practices: Judges, lawyers and the state in Russia and China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 351.

    TREVASKES, SUSAN 2010. The Shifting Sands of Punishment in China in the Era of “Harmonious Society”. Law & Policy, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 332.

    STERN, RACHEL E. 2009. On the Frontlines: Making Decisions in Chinese Civil Environmental Lawsuits. Law & Policy,

  • The China Quarterly, Volume 191
  • September 2007, pp. 620-638

China's Courts: Restricted Reform


China's courts have in recent years engaged in significant reforms designed to raise the quality of their work. Yet such top-down reforms have been largely technical and are not designed to alter courts' power. Courts have also encountered new challenges, including rising populist pressures, which may undermine their authority. The most important changes in China's courts have come from the ground up: local courts have engaged in significant innovation, and horizontal interaction among judges is facilitating the development of professional identity. Recent developments have largely avoided two central questions facing China's courts: why have courts been permitted to develop even limited new roles, and what additional roles, if any, may they play within the Chinese political system?

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The China Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0305-7410
  • EISSN: 1468-2648
  • URL: /core/journals/china-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *