Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:45:40.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elections, Political Change and Basic Law Government: The Hong Kong System in Search of a Political Form*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Suzanne Pepper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the two decades preceding its 1997 reunification with China, imaginations in Hong Kong ran the gamut from fear to euphoria. Preparations for transfer from British to Chinese rule continued accordingly and Hong Kong's political development has been shaped by the conflicting imperatives responsible for those extremes. Most simply put, the imperatives grew from Hong Kong's fear of Chinese communism and China's fear of an anti-communist Hong Kong. Anxieties were greatest in the colony during 1982 and 1983, when Chinese leaders made known their determination to resume full sovereignty after the 1997 expiration of Britain's leasehold on 90 per cent of Hong Kong's territory. Apprehensions peaked again in 1989, following the military suppression of Beijing's student protest movement in Tiananmen Square. Yet fear also alternated with expressions of great bravado, when the dangers of latterday Chinese communism seemed to pale before the prospect of China's inevitable “Hong Kong-ization.” Between these two extremes, confidence levels waxed and waned as Chinese and British leaders responded, first by negotiating safeguards and then by writing them into law.

Type
Elections and Democracy in Greater China
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 162 , June 2000 , pp. 410 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. SirJeffries, Charles, The Colonial Office (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1956), p. 87.Google Scholar

2. Swinfen, D. B., Imperial Control of Colonial Legislation, 1813–1865 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970)Google Scholar; Jeffries, Charles, The Colonial Empire and Its Civil Service (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938).Google Scholar

3. E.g. Wight, Martin, The Development of the Legislative Council, 1606–1945 (London: Faber and Faber, 1946).Google Scholar

4. Pottinger, George, Sir Henry Pottinger: First Governor of Hong Kong (New York: St Martin's Press, 1997).Google Scholar

5. Endacott, G. B., Government and People in Hong Kong, 1841–1962 (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1964), Appendix B and Appendix D.Google Scholar

6. For a survey of the electoral reform proposals in Hong Kong's past going back to the beginning, see Endacott, , Government and People, passim.Google Scholar

7. Miners, N. J., “Plans for constitutional reform in Hong Kong, 1946–52,” The China Quarterly, No. 107 (09 1986), p. 464.Google Scholar

8. On this period, see especially, Tsang, Steve Yui-Sang, Democracy Shelved: Great Britain, China, and Attempts at Constitutional Reform in Hong Kong, 1945–1952 (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar; also Miners, , “Plans for constitutional reform,” pp. 463–482.Google Scholar

9. Endacott, , Government and People, pp. 194–195Google Scholar; Tsang, , Democracy Shelved, pp. 143–150.Google Scholar

10. Hong Kong Hansard: Reports of the Meetings of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong, Session 1949, 22 06 1949, pp. 188–205.Google Scholar

11. Grantham, Alexander, Via Ports: From Hong Kong to Hong Kong (Hong Kong University Press, 1965), pp. 111–12, 195.Google Scholar Grantham was governor of Hong Kong from 1947 to 1957. His above-cited views, published in 1965, were identical to those he articulated internally in 1950 (see Tsang, , Democracy Shelved, esp. pp. 122–23).Google Scholar

12. With the most sensitive government files still closed, despite Britain's 30-year access rule, all the arguments remain tentative for want of authoritative documentation. For an updated review of relevant documents available, see Wesley-Smith, Peter, Unequal Treaty, 1898–1997: China, Great Britain, and Hong Kong's New Territories (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, rev. ed., 1998), pp. 237–270Google Scholar; Tsang, Steve, “Strategy for survival: the Cold War and Hong Kong's policy towards Kuomintang and Chinese Communist activities in the 1950s,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, Vol. 25, No. 2 (05 1997), pp. 294–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and, Clayton, David, Imperialism Revisited: Political and Economic Relations Between Britain and China, 1950–54 (New York: St Martin's Press, 1997), ch. five (pp. 96–122).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. The term “benevolent autocracy” was used by Grantham and later by Patten critic Percy Cradock, to characterize Hong Kong's form of colonial government. See Tsang, , Democracy Shelved, p. 64Google Scholar; and Cradock, Percy, Experiences of China (London: John Murray, 1994) p. 226.Google Scholar

14. A fairly extensive critical literature now exists on civic education past and present in Hong Kong. See, for example, Morris, Paul, “Preparing pupils as citizens of the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong: an analysis of curriculum change and control during the transition period,” in Postiglione, Gerard A. (ed.), Education and Society in Hong Kong (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1992), pp. 117–145Google Scholar; Tse, Thomas Kwan-choi, The Poverty of Political Education in Hong Kong Secondary Schools, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Occasional Paper no. 69 (11 1997)Google Scholar, esp. the reference list which includes both Chinese and English sources.

15. Hong Kong Annual Report, 1952 (Hong Kong Government Printer), p. 27Google Scholar; Hong Kong: Report for the Year 1961 (Hong Kong Government Press, 1962), p. 24Google Scholar; Hong Kong 1982 (Hong Kong Government Printer, 1982), pp. 227–28Google Scholar; Burns, John P., “Immigration from China and the future of Hong Kong,” Asian Survey, 06 1987, pp. 661–682.Google Scholar

16. Wenfang, Huang, Zhongguo dui Xianggang huifu xingshi zhuquan dejuece licheng yu zhixing (China's Resumption of Sovereignty Over Hong Kong: Decision-Making and Implemention) (Hong Kong: Institute for East-West Studies, Baptist University, 1997), ch. 1 (pp. 1–24).Google Scholar As a senior NCNA official in Hong Kong, Huang had considerable first-hand knowledge of the events described. Evidently, Britain's Labour government had actually been considering some such Macau-type solution, but the idea was dropped by its Conservative successor, which won the general election in early 1979. See Cottrell, Robert, The End of Hong Kong: The Secret Diplomacy of Imperial Retreat (London: John Murray, 1993), pp. 49–50.Google Scholar After the die was cast, Britain did try in 1982–83, without success, to barter sovereignty for a continuing British administrative presence.

17. Councillors' commentaries are from the Legislative Council debate on the 1984 green paper, in Hong Kong Hansard, 2 08 1984, pp. 1352–1412.Google Scholar

18. South China Morning Post, Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Standard, both 17 09 1984.Google Scholar For a useful collection of early popular views inspired by the 1997 question, see Cheng, Joseph Y. S. (ed.), Hong Kong in Search of a Future (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1984), passimGoogle Scholar; also, Shiu-hing, Lo, The Politics of Democratization in Hong Kong (New York: St Martin's Press, 1997), chs 2–4 (pp. 67–176).Google Scholar

19. See, for example, Martin Lee's maiden speech in the Legislative Council (Hong Kong Hansard, 27 11 1985, pp. 146–49).Google Scholar

20. Also evoking memories of the past was the Hong Kong government's manipulation of its promised reform review in 1987. This conformed to long-standing colonial precedent whereby petitions for reform were dismissed as “unrepresentative.” On the controversy surrounding the 1987 exercise, see Roberti, Mark, The Fall of Hong Kong: China's Triumph and Britain's Betrayal (New York: John Wiley, 1996, rev. ed.), ch. 17 (pp. 197–210)Google Scholar; Miners, Norman, The Government and Politics of Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1991, 5th ed.), pp. 26–27Google Scholar; and, Dimbleby, Jonathan, The Last Governor (London: Warner Books, 1998), pp. 129–130.Google Scholar

21. On Hong Kong's early 1990s political evolution, see, Kin-sheun, Louie, “Political parties,” in Yun-wing, Sung and Ming-Kwan, Lee (eds.), The Other Hong Kong Report, 1991 (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1991), pp. 55–75Google Scholar; McMillen, Donald H. and DeGolyer, Michael E. (eds.), One Culture, Many Systems: Politics in the Reunification of China (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1993), part one, passim.Google Scholar

22. Although couched in careful parliamentary prose, these reasons for London's 1992 shift are evident, in “Relations between the United Kingdom and China in the period up to and beyond 1997,” Foreign Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 23 March 1994.

23. Patten's address seems to be the only document outlining his programme in full. See, “Our next five years: the agenda for Hong Kong,” Hong Kong Hansard, 7 10 1992, pp. 14–49.Google Scholar

24. For Patten's perspective on the reforms, see, Dimbleby, , The Last GovernorGoogle Scholar, passim', for another view: Tsang, Steve, Hong Kong: Appointment with China (London: I.B. Tauris, 1997), ch. 9 (pp. 181–208).Google Scholar

25. British Foreign Office regulars generally took exception to the Pattern reform package on the grounds that China would never accept it. Hence potential risks in terms of Chinese retribution might well outweigh short-term gains. The old hands also knew more than did Patten about the effort to win China's acceptance for directly elected LegCo seats which, due to the convergence agreement, had been the subject of considerable discussion between Britain and China during the Basic Law's final drafting stage. In the acrimonious dispute that followed, China forced the release of relevant 1990 correspondence between the British and Chinese foreign ministers, which everyone on the British side allegedly “forgot” to share with Patten. The correspondence was published in Renmin ribao (haiwaiban) (People's Daily, overseas edition) and China Daily, both 29 10 1992.Google Scholar

26. See, for example, Hong Kong Hansard, 29 06 1994, pp. 4690–5049.Google Scholar

27. Calculations are my own based on the official election results (South China Morning Post, 19 09 1995Google Scholar). One pro-China source estimated 34% of the popular vote in the geographic constituencies for its candidates and 61% for the democrats (Wenhui bao, 22 09 1995Google Scholar). Patten claimed that democrats received about 60% of the popular vote both in 1991 and 1995 (South China Morning Post, 2 10 1995Google Scholar); depending on candidate categorization, some calculations placed the democratic camp's share of the vote as high as 65–66%.

28. Wenhui bao, South China Morning Post and Hong Kong Standard, all 29 12 1995.Google Scholar

29. A few Chinese-language newspapers printed the secretariat's ranked shortlists, e.g. Xianggang jingji ribao (Hong Kong Economic Daily), and Xingdao ribao (Sing Too Daily), both 2 11 1996.Google Scholar

30. Wenhui bao. South China Morning Post and Hong Kong Standard, all 3 and 4 11 1996.Google Scholar

31. Hong Kong Standard, 22 12 1996.Google Scholar

32. See Pepper, Suzanne, “Hong Kong joins the National People's Congress: a first test for one country with two political systems,” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 8, No. 21 (07 1999), pp. 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. On the 1998 elections and related developments, see Richard Baum's article in this issue.

34. See “Chouweihui guanyu Zhonghua renmin gongheguo Xianggang tebie xingzhengqu diyi jie lifahui de juti chansheng banfa” (‘The Preparatory Committee's concrete methods for producing the first Legislative Council of the Hong Kong SAR, of the People's Republic of China”), passed by the PC's ninth plenary meeting, 23 May 1997, in Qiushi, Yuan (ed.), Xianggang guodu shiqi zhongyao wenjian huibian (A Compilation of Important Documents on Hong Kong's Transition Period) (Hong Kong: Sanlian, 1997), pp. 304–307Google Scholar; and Legislative Council Ordinance, in, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Gazette, Legal Supplement, No. 1, 3 10 1997, pp. 435–621.Google Scholar

35. Official election results in, South China Morning Post, Hong Kong Standard and Wenhui bao, all 26 05 1998.Google Scholar