Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T20:46:56.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Partial Democratization, “Foundation Moment” and Political Parties in Hong Kong*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

Before the late 1980s, political parties were unknown phenomena in colonial Hong Kong. Since then measures of democratization initiated by the British in anticipation of their withdrawal in 1997 made available a portion of political power for public contest. The democratic reforms initiated by Chris Patten, the last colonial governor of Hong Kong, accelerated party formation and competition in the last few years of British rule.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The sample used in the questionnaire survey was drawn by means of a multi-stage design. The target population was Chinese inhabitants in Hong Kong aged 18 years old or over. Since the full list of such adults was impossible to obtain, we used the list of permanent and residential areas from the Census and Statistics Department's computerized Sub-Frame of Living Quarters. With the assistance of the Department, a replicated systematic sample of 2,500 addresses was selected which, after the exclusion of vacant, demolished and unidentifiable addresses, plus those without Chinese residents, was reduced to 2,127. The next stage of sampling involved the selection of households and eligible respondents. Interviews were required to call at each address. If there were two or more households, only one would be selected according to a random selection table. For each selected household, the interviewer listed all persons aged 18 years old or over, and the respondent was then selected by means of a random selection grid (a modified Kish grid). Face-to-face interviews with structured questionnaires were carried out by interviewers recruited from local tertiary institutions, mainly the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Fieldwork was conducted mostly during 25 May and 26 June 1998. At the end of the survey, 988 cases were successfully completed, yielding a response rate of 46.5 percent which can be considered satisfactory in the context of Hong Kong.

2. Siu-kai, Lau, “Decolonization à la Hong Kong: Britain's search for govemability and exit with glory in Hong Kong,” The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, Vol. 35, No. 2 (07 1997), pp. 2854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Siu-kai, Lau, “Hong Kong's path of democratization,” Swiss Asian Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1 (1995), pp. 7190.Google Scholar

4. Siu-kai, Lau, From the “Through Train” to “Setting Up the New Stove”: Sino-British Row Over the Election of the Hong Kong Legislature (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1998)Google Scholar, and “The making of the electoral system,” in Hsin-chi, Kuan, Siu-kai, Lau, Kin-sheun, Louie and Wong, Timothy Ka-ying (eds.), Power Transfer and Electoral Politics: The First Legislative Election in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1999), pp. 335.Google Scholar See also Cheek-Milby, Kathleen, A Legislature Comes of Age: Hong Kong's Search for Influence and Identity (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

5. Siu-kai, Lau, Public Attitude Toward Political Parties in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1992).Google Scholar

6. All the associations or correlations reported are significant at the .05 level, using either the x2 test or the Pearson correlation coefficient.

7. Siu-kai, Lau. Democratization, Poverty of Political Leaders, and Political Inefficacy in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1998).Google Scholar

8. Instead of the labels “pro-London” and “pro-Beijing,” the labels of pro-Britain and pro-China are used in common parlance in Hong Kong. However, for the sake of conceptual clarity, the former pair are used in this article.

9. See for example Shiu-hing, Lo, “Political opposition, co-optation and democratization: the case of Hong Kong,” in Pang-kwong, Li (ed.), Political Order and Power Transition in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1997), pp. 127157.Google Scholar

10. See Siu-kai, Lau and Kin-sheun, Louie (eds.), Hong Kong Tried Democracy: The 1991 Elections in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1993)Google Scholar; Kwok, Rowena, Leung, Joan and Scott, Ian (eds.), Votes Without Power: The Hong Kong Legislative Council Elections (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1992)Google Scholar; Hsin-chi, Kuan, Siu-kai, Lau, Kin-sheun, Louie and Ka-ying, Wong (eds.). The 1995 Legislative Council Elections in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1996)Google Scholar; and Kuan, et al. , Power Transfer and Electoral Politics.Google Scholar

11. See Rodan, Garry (ed.), Political Oppositions in Industrialising Asia (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

12. Hsin-chi, Kuan and Siu-kai, Lau, “The partial vision of democracy in Hong Kong: a survey of popular opinion,” The China Journal, No. 34 (07 1995), pp. 239264.Google Scholar

13. Yeung, Chris K.H., “Political parties,” in Cheng, Joseph Y. S. (ed.), The Other Hong Kong Report 1997 (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1997), pp. 4970.Google Scholar

14. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R., “Introduction: party systems in Latin America,” in Mainwaring, and Scully, (eds.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995), p. 20.Google Scholar

15. In the past “right” meant pro-Nationalist China. But this meaning has been much diluted with the dissipating political influence of Taiwan's Nationalist regime on Hong Kong.

16. Panebianco, Angelo, Political Parties: Organization & Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 50.Google Scholar

17. Siu-kai, Lau, “The fraying of the socioeconomic fabric of Hong Kong,” The Pacific Review, Vol. 10, No. 3 (1997), pp. 426441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Siu-Kai, Lau, “The eclipse of politics in the Hong Kong Special Adminstrative Region,” Asian Affairs, Vol. 25, No. 1 (Spring 1998), pp. 3846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19. Siu-kai, Lau, “The rise and decline of political support for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government,” Government and Opposition, Vol. 34, No. 3 (Summer 1999), pp. 352371.Google Scholar

20. See the bi-monthly polls conducted by the Home Affairs Department of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government since May 1998.

21. Wong, Timothy Ka-ying, “Issue voting,”Google Scholar in Kuan, et al. , Power Transfer and Electoral Politics, pp. 105129.Google Scholar

22. Siu-kai, Lau, “Livelihood issues take a back seat,” South China Morning Post, 17 05 1998, p. 11.Google Scholar

23. Based on survey data, Milan Tung-wen Sun found that party voting (defined as vote for the candidates from the party with which the voters identified) in Hong Kong was strongly associated with the strength of partisanship. This was in turn affected by the retrospective evaluation of the party's past performance rather than by the perceived expectation. See Sun, , “Party identification re-examined: retrospective or prospective voting,”Google Scholar in Kuan, et al. , Power Transfer and Electoral Politics, pp. 131153.Google Scholar

24. The telephone polls conducted by the Social Science Research Centre of the University of Hong Kong have found gradual weakening of public support for political parties. In the March 1999 poll, it was found that the pro-Beijing Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions, which focused primarily on labour and livelihood issues, enjoyed a level of public support higher than any of the political parties in Hong Kong. See Ming bao, 24 04 1999, p. A6.Google Scholar

25. The poll was conducted by the Social Science Research Centre of the University of Hong Kong. See Pinguo ribao (Apple Daily), 5 01 1999, p. A18.Google Scholar

26. See the Hong Kong Transition Project, The Matrix: What's Real and What's Not in Hong Kong Public Opinion (07 1999), mimeo., p. 28.Google Scholar

27. The most visible internal rift appears in the DP. It is in the midst of a mounting crisis in reconciling its grassroots and middle-class orientations. See Yeung, Chris, “Struggle to strike a balance,” South China Morning Post, 17 12 1998, p. 19Google Scholar; and “Call for calm at party crossroads,” South China Morning Post, 1 01 1999, p. 13.Google Scholar

28. Opinion polls show that public support for the Legislative Council had failed over the past year. In addition, party leaders trailed behind senior government officials in popularity. See for example, Pinguo ribao, 28 12 1998, p. A1Google Scholar;ibid. 5 January 1999, p. A18; and Hong Kong Standard, 1 04 1999, p. 4.Google Scholar

29. Tsui, Clarence, “Search for successors proves an uphill job,” South China Morning Post, 04 5, 1999, p. 13.Google Scholar