Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T06:30:26.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Astrology in Dracontivs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Extract

Nec, si rationem siderum ignoret, poetas iniellegat said Quintilian of Γ ραμματική; and in the history of scholarship during the last two centuries there is much to confirm his sentence. The elements of astronomy were once part of a scholar's ordinary equipment, and astronomical allusions in the poets, if expounded at all and not left by the editor to the knowledge and intelligence of the reader, were usually expounded aright. The first three lines of Lucan's seventh book are briefly but correctly explained by the scholiast, and Oudendorp so late as 1728 was content to quote his explanation: then Cortius and Burmann and Bentley came forward to misinterpret them, and they have been misinterpreted ever since, because editors of the classics no longer know which way the sun moves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 193 note 1 One can hardly glance at a Greek astrological text without seeing something that wants correction: in the next line and a dozen lines above ought both to be , and in the words preceding my citation the γάρ should be deleted and the stop removed from πασ⋯ν to ςῳδíῳ.

page 195 note 1 Rigler's index is so defective that I give here the instances which I have noted, omitting all places where the noun has an epithet serving to define it, such as βρoτη, γoνíμη, βιoτσκóπoς, τεκνoσπóρoς. III 32, 90, 158, 186, 190, 194, 208, 415; VI 23, 27, 36, 38, 60, 84, 95, 103, 106, 151, 172, 173, 315, 355, 380, 480, 556, 561, 649, 666, 716, 747; IV 28, no, 165; I 267; V 27, 28, 314, 321.